Results 101 - 120 of 1275
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: srbaegon Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
101 | Hank - Diet ??? | Bible general Archive 2 | srbaegon | 147622 | ||
Hello Merv, One more time...neither the 10 commandments nor the remaining law of Moses had been given yet. Because of your stubborn refusal to listen to sound doctrine, I am drawing this debate to a close. Steve |
||||||
102 | Hank - Diet ??? | Bible general Archive 2 | srbaegon | 147624 | ||
Hello Merv, "Problem again is the Sabbath was used as a test to the people prior to it being 'given' at Sinai." Once again a statement without scriptural support. Your stubborn refusal to listen to sound doctrine (or give it) forces me to end this. Steve |
||||||
103 | Hank - Diet ??? | Bible general Archive 2 | srbaegon | 147625 | ||
Hello Merv, You refuse to listen to sound doctrine. You refuse to stay on topic. I am closing this debate. Steve |
||||||
104 | Hank - Diet ??? | Bible general Archive 2 | srbaegon | 147626 | ||
Hello Merv, "Steve, I know we enjoy this lively debate or we would not have continued it !!" Yes, I enjoy lively debate. But since you stubbornly refuse sound teaching, I'm ending this. Steve |
||||||
105 | Hank - Doctrine from God or Man ? | Bible general Archive 2 | srbaegon | 147630 | ||
Hello Merv, "Please take my points in love," Perhaps if they were given in love I could. You stubbornly refuse sound doctrine. This is closed. Steve |
||||||
106 | The Interpreation of #'s | Bible general Archive 2 | srbaegon | 153688 | ||
Hello ominous, This is a Bible study forum, not a Kabalah forum. Keep your answers confined to the Bible as per the forum rules. Steve |
||||||
107 | Persicution | Bible general Archive 2 | srbaegon | 155269 | ||
Hi Tim, I had not heard that the Book of Mormon was a plagerized novel. Do you have any more info? Steve |
||||||
108 | Mat. 24:36 | Bible general Archive 2 | srbaegon | 155444 | ||
Hi Doc, I was unaware of any modifications in the Nicene creed. Were these subtle changes over time? Thomas Owen? I don't know that name. Steve |
||||||
109 | Only seal and horse in same verse Rev6:5 | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 18712 | ||
Tim, Casiv has a valid observation in that certain numbers turn up again and again in particular areas and ways. However, you make a valid point that men too often take this to extremes as the bible code people did with their work. Steve |
||||||
110 | how many books in bible? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 18788 | ||
What do you mean by "everything that exists is the Father"? Are you pantheistic? Steve |
||||||
111 | Only seal and horse in same verse Rev6:5 | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 18913 | ||
The "governmental perfection" in the number 12 comes from two sources: 1) Israel as God's earthly people is based on 12 tribes; and 2) The church as God's heavenly people is based on 12 apostles whose names are written on the 12 foundation stones of New Jerusalem (Rev 21:14). Before you ask, "Is Judas Iscariot one that is written, and if not, who is instead?" Let me tell you Scripture does not say. I think Judas was replaced by Paul, but I could be wrong. He might have been replaced by Matthias. Steve |
||||||
112 | how many books in bible? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 18918 | ||
OK, you are not a pantheist, but now you sound like a modalist (one who believes there is one God who works in three modes--Father, Son, Spirit). Jesus did not say He was the Father. Jesus said He was God. There is a difference which the Lord Jesus made time and again, even in the verse you quoted (John 14:9). And why do you say God's name is unpronounceable? Ignorance does not equal inability. Because one does not know how, does not mean one cannot do it. Steve |
||||||
113 | how many books in bible? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 19179 | ||
You still have not proved YHWH is unpronounceable. All you have proven is that the pronunciation appears to be unknown currently. I already knew that. Did I misunderstand you? Did you mean to say that YHWH is currently unpronounceable, or that it has always been unpronounceable? Steve |
||||||
114 | Only seal and horse in same verse Rev6:5 | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 19418 | ||
You need to get your facts straight. Textus Receptus was completed by Erasmus in the early 1500's. Mr. Nestle was not born until 1851. They are not connected. Textus Receptus is not the oldest copy of New Testament. There are manuscripts 1000 years older. There is no consiracy to cover up the use of stigma. That was for numeric use while uncials were common. It was dropped later because it was too close to the lower-case final sigma. Someone has already mentioned this or provided a web site that mentions it. Strong's concordance is excellent, but it's not the only excellent lexical aid available. Lastly, if the explanation takes so much effort, it probably is not correct. Seek the plain sense. Steve |
||||||
115 | Only seal and horse in same verse Rev6:5 | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 19426 | ||
Itroverb and introbrae are not on the web nor in the dictionary. It seems you are the only person with this knowledge. The reason most people don't unterstand the Bible is because it is spiritually appraised (1 Cor 2:14). It has nothing to do with numerics. Steve |
||||||
116 | Only seal and horse in same verse Rev6:5 | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 19642 | ||
So, you are saying that what was written by the different Scripture writers are God's words and not the words of the writer. Am I correct? Steve |
||||||
117 | Only seal and horse in same verse Rev6:5 | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 19645 | ||
I am quite well, thank you. Thank you for quoting the verse I had in mind when I asked the question. As for alternation and introversion, I looked up the words. To restate this now, I believe you to be saying that Scripture is internally consistent, because we see many writers giving the same basic message. Am I correct again? Or was there something I may have missed? Steve |
||||||
118 | Only seal and horse in same verse Rev6:5 | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 19824 | ||
I know of the Companion Bible but have never seen one. Does Bullinger's notes and appendices reflect some of the same material you have shared here? Now that I better understand what you are saying, we have agreement on several things. I still cannot agree with your contention that the stigma in 666 is the cross. In both my Newberry reference Bible and my copy of the Textus Receptus, the final character is shaped like a final sigma (upside-down 5 or "s" with a large head). I think Strong's intent of referencing 4742 was to demontrate the that there were different "stigmas" or marks--the cross being an example of one. It's not the only example. In the English language we have had the same type of thing. We "make a mark" as a signature if we don't know how to write. We "make a mark" to cut a straight line in a piece of timber. We "make a mark" to identify something as our own. Steve |
||||||
119 | Only seal and horse in same verse Rev6:5 | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 19954 | ||
Good morning. The material I was referring to was the biblical numerics that you mentioned. I think the information you have shared concerning the numbers is correct, but I wish to caution you in the way they are used. For instance, when reading books on how the Old Testament tabernacle and priesthood were pictures of Christ and His work, I would share with others what I found and tell them this was the truth. When they asked for clarification, I couldn't do it, because I did not yet understand the reasoning behind the pictures or types. You presented many numbers as fact without giving explanation, so people questioned if you knew what you were talking about. Both of our situations made us appear foolish. (I'm not saying you don't understand the numbers, just that you didn't explain them.) I do understand the parable of the sower. I just don't understand how you can dogmatically state that stigma was changed from the shape of a cross to something else. Steve |
||||||
120 | Genesis Creation, a practical example? | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 19975 | ||
I very much agree with Ed's comments, and not just because they agree with what I was taught when studying hermeneutics. I think part of the problem stems from our literary genres being broken up into distinct areas, while the "storytelling" communication of earlier cultures commonly had these genres intermixed. Steve |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ] Next > Last [64] >> |