Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | A thought about the Flood | Bible general Archive 2 | greentwiga | 141200 | ||
There is a huge difference between unproven and unsupported. You make the theory sound unsupported. Notice also that the Bible only indicates it was about 6,000 years since Adam. What if the man in Genesis 1 was different from the man in Genesis two. If so, we can't say how old the earth was. This is just an example of how we might be relying too heavily on one interpretation. Do we also suppress other interpretations, just like we accuse the scientists of doing? Greentwiga |
||||||
2 | A thought about the Flood | Bible general Archive 2 | Pastor Glenn | 141203 | ||
"... What if the man in Genesis 1 was different from the man in Genesis two. If so, we can't say how old the earth was. This is just an example of how we might be relying too heavily on one interpretation. " Gen 1 26Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all[b] the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth." 27So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. 28Then God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth." Wouldn't that make Jesus the "third" Adam? And who was that man and woman that recieved all of that dominion? And why would Jesus quote Gen chapter 1? Pastor Glenn |
||||||