Results 1 - 11 of 11
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | How can the Son at the end be subject be | 1 Cor 15:28 | oldone | 228490 | ||
Anyone who studies God word has heard of the doctrine of the trinity which I do not accept. The bible is very plain in the FACT that God is a spirit not a man (person means-an individual or a human being). Col 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. Jesus the only person in the Godhead. When anyone questions my limited intellegence then I stop my diccussions with them Lord bless you Beja |
||||||
2 | How can the Son at the end be subject be | 1 Cor 15:28 | biblicalman | 228491 | ||
The problem here is that you are giving your own definition to the word 'person' Person does not necessarily mean 'individual' or 'human being'. Our problem is always in finding human language which can be used to describe God. Certainly God is not three individuals, nor is He three human beings. In fact strictly the word used throughout history has been 'persona' which is not as strong as person. True the Father is Spirit, the Son is Spirit, and the Holy Spirit is Spirit. And the Spirit of the Son became man. This latter fact empohasises the distinctions within the Godhead. God is One and yet within Him is a threeness, and this threeness is intercomunicating and inter-personal. Thus Father communicates with Son, and Son with Father, and both communicate with the Spirit. Their relationship is inter-personal. For convenience we speak of three persons. We have no other word to use. But we must put the in proviso that God is not three separate individuals. Jesus clearly revealed this when He said, 'He who has seen Me has seen the Father'. In other words so close is the relationship between Father and Son that to see One is to see the other. Nevertheless the fact is that the Son became man and the Father did not. Thus they are not simply modes of the same Being. There is a separateness between them. |
||||||
3 | How can the Son at the end be subject be | 1 Cor 15:28 | SeekTruth | 228554 | ||
Hello! God is absolutely one. Persons, persona, individuals, or any other non-biblical word is unnecessary. God is not a "committee" or a "council" who intercommunicates. In all actuality, the Father was manifest to take way our sins. 1 John 3:1-5 shows this, where verse one establishes the Father as the subject of the passage and verse 5 tells us this very truth. Please show me otherwise where it says in the scriptures that the (unbiblical) "second person", the Son, became a man. God bless. |
||||||
4 | How can the Son at the end be subject be | 1 Cor 15:28 | srbaegon | 228555 | ||
Hello SeekTruth, You do a good job of using a portion of the biblical text to make your point. Perhaps using the whole thing will shed light on the truth. The discussion into which you break concerns being children of God. This actually begins at 1 John 2:28 where the referent of the pronouns (abide in him, so that when he appears...) is the Son, whose real coming to earth as messiah and taking on a human nature is the thesis of the epistle. Pick all the cherries you like. The epistle is clear in reference to three co-equal, eternal persons. Steve |
||||||
5 | How can the Son at the end be subject be | 1 Cor 15:28 | SeekTruth | 228557 | ||
Scriptures never show three persons. The epistles never speak of this either. That's trinitarian doctrine spoken into the text. Why do you find it so hard to see the one God taking up different manifestations? Show me some scriptures and I'm sure I can show you otherwise, and correctly. God bless. |
||||||
6 | How can the Son at the end be subject be | 1 Cor 15:28 | DocTrinsograce | 228558 | ||
Hi SeekTruth... Are you a Jehovah's Witness? In Him, Doc |
||||||
7 | How can the Son at the end be subject be | 1 Cor 15:28 | SeekTruth | 228559 | ||
Nope, I am not. I believe in the full deity of Christ! Amen. God bless. |
||||||
8 | How can the Son at the end be subject be | 1 Cor 15:28 | DocTrinsograce | 228560 | ||
Pentecostal Oneness? | ||||||
9 | How can the Son at the end be subject be | 1 Cor 15:28 | SeekTruth | 228561 | ||
Yes, but otherwise known to many trinitarians as a "herectic" lol. Which I am certainly not. | ||||||
10 | How can the Son at the end be subject be | 1 Cor 15:28 | biblicalman | 228566 | ||
seektruth you say you are not a heretic. the whole church says that you are heretic. i wonder who is right? | ||||||
11 | How can the Son at the end be subject be | 1 Cor 15:28 | SeekTruth | 228571 | ||
Is the church God? No. Does the church honestly understand Oneness? No. I'm not worried. God bless. |
||||||