Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Sunday Sabbath or not? | Ex 20:8 | EdB | 232905 | ||
Slander him? How by asking his motive for trying to make the connection between a heretical teaching and theology held by the majority of Protestant believers? A theology he openly opposes. You can’t be serious do a google search where everyone is an expert and all facts are presented in a fair and impartial manner after receiving careful and exhaustive research. Both you and Doc claim there is clear and integral connection between Dispensationalism and Antinomianism and all I ask is a book, paper or article where the author a known respected Dispensationalist makes such a connection. To satisfy you I did a search on Google and I haven't found a site that supports a connection between Dispensationalism and Antinomianism. Although I did find a high number of sites that are sure their Mayan calendar proves the world ends in 2012. |
||||||
2 | Sunday Sabbath or not? | Ex 20:8 | Beja | 232909 | ||
Ed, This is from Scofield it seems. "It is instructive, in this connection, to remember that God's appointed place for the tables of the law was within the ark of the testimony. With them were "the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron's rod that budded" (types: the one of Christ our wilderness bread, the other of resurrection, and both speaking of grace), while they were covered from sight by the golden mercy seat upon which was sprinkled the blood of atonement. The eye of God could see His broken law only through the blood that completely vindicated His justice and propitiated His wrath (Heb. 9:4-5). It was reserved to modernists to wrench these holy and just but deathful tables from underneath the mercy seat and the atoning blood and erect them in Christian churches as the rule of Christian life." Now to be fair in the very same sermon he rejects "antinomianism." What he refers to as antinomianism is the suggestion that there is no rule of behavior in the believer's life. He simply denies that it is the ten commandmants or the Old Testament law. So here, we see the main popularizer of dispensationalism affirm that while there is infact a rule of behavior for Christians, it is most certainly not the OT law. Second, here is the webster's dictionary definition for antinomian. one who holds that under the gospel dispensation of grace the moral law is of no use or obligation because faith alone is necessary to salvation. Here is the definition from the catholic encyclopedia. "The heretical doctrine that Christians are exempt from the obligations of moral law." Now...I accept that dispensationalist C Scofield did not teach antinomianism as he himself defines antinomianism. But he taught exactly what the websters dictionary and catholic encyclopedia taught is antinomianism. Is this sufficient documentation? In Christ, Beja |
||||||
3 | Sunday Sabbath or not? | Ex 20:8 | EdB | 232912 | ||
Matthew 5:18 (NKJV) 18 For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled. I find it hard to believe anyone is seriously suggesting that Scofield is promoting antinomianism from the text you quoted. No where does he say “because of the gospel dispensation of grace the moral law is of no use or obligation because faith alone is necessary to salvation.” Nor did he say, “that Christians are exempt from the obligations of moral law." The two tests you provided as proof of antinomianism. Is he really saying cast off the restraints of God or is he saying Christians have an even more demanding set of guidelines? Jesus gave us two great commandments that encompassed all of 10 of the 10 commandments. And if we kept only the 10 we would fall short of what Jesus commanded us to keep in the two great commandments. |
||||||