Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Are we back to the absurd view...? | 2 Timothy | Reformer Joe | 80999 | ||
Know what else is an interesting read? http://www.studybibleforum.com/termsreview.php Does your harassing violation of the Terms of Use and false witness bring glory to the God you claim to be representing? Just go away. This is the kind of thing people lose their Internet accounts over, for starters... --Joe! |
||||||
2 | Are we back to the absurd view...? | 2 Timothy | disciplermeam | 81009 | ||
Joe! Maybe you can explain to me why a you may post your opinions all day long, even though your 'unabashed' Calvinism is a divisive as any doctrine? Day in and day out you press your ridiculous doctrine onto any and all. It is an odious doctrine and I've let you know that. But have you gotten any warnings to stop? I doubt it. My opinions are mine. I quote scripture and you quote Calvin. Who is right? I always act in a way that brings glory to God. Matthew 28:18-20 is the same baptism as Mark 16:16 is the same baptism as Acts 2:38 is the same baptism as Acts 8:12 is the same baptism as Acts 22:16 is the same baptism as Romans 6:3-5 is the same baptism as Galatians 3:266,27 is the same baptism as Colossians 2:12 is the same baptism as 1 Peter 3:21. Good day. As far as the names go, it's all anonymous. So you've given yourself away as being on the inside. I assume by your other question that you also represent the legal arm of the Lockman foundation? This must be the reason you may post without impunity the divisive stuff you do. |
||||||
3 | Are we back to the absurd view...? | 2 Timothy | Reformer Joe | 81013 | ||
" Maybe you can explain to me why a you may post your opinions all day long, even though your 'unabashed' Calvinism is a divisive as any doctrine?" Because while it is certainly a doctrine which not everyone agrees with (like yours), I do actually post about other things. Click on my name below and look at my posts. You will see that I can actually post without mentioning Reformed doctrine at all. Is the same true for you and baptism? You have made your point regarding baptism, and now you have taken it upon yourself to commandeer every thread, whether it has anything to do with baptism or not, and flood the Forum with your view. "I quote scripture and you quote Calvin." I don't quote Scripture? ;) "Matthew 28:18-20 is the same baptism..." You have made your point, and I agree with you, as a matter of fact. Why do you think repeating this statement in every single one of your posts is going to make it more convincing? "As far as the names go, it's all anonymous. So you've given yourself away as being on the inside. I assume by your other question that you also represent the legal arm of the Lockman foundation?" No, that was just a courteous notice in case you were not aware. While I am in no way affiliated with the Lockman Foundation, I do have to read through your spamming to get to something worthy of a reply. It is simply dishonoring to God to carry on the way you are, even if you are theologically correct. --Joe! |
||||||