Results 1 - 5 of 5
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Are we back to the absurd view...? | 2 Timothy | Radioman2 | 80908 | ||
Are we back to the absurd view that the KJV is the Bible of Paul and the apostles? Many people, such as the KJV-Only advocates, are scared to death that someone might get hold of a so-called corrupt Bible translation that will somehow deceive them into committing apostasy or heresy. The inspiration of the Bible, the deity of Christ, the incarnation, the atonement, God's plan of salvation, the Second Coming of Christ, etc. can be proven using the KJV, NKJV, NIV, ASV, RSV, NASB, or any number of other translations. The idea that the same passage in one version will be translated to have an opposite meaning in another verison is pure nonsense. I see no need for people to become hysterical in their fierce opposition to this translation or their fanatical defense of that translation. Moreover, the differences in the wording of various translations is due more to the aim of the translators (to produce a word-for-word or thought-for thought translation) than to differences in the underlying Greek texts, which are minor. |
||||||
2 | Are we back to the absurd view...? | 2 Timothy | disciplermeam | 80998 | ||
I've found that the Gospel can be taught even with the Good News Bible. It does an amazing job on Baptism verses: Ac 2:38 - Peter said to them, "Each one of you must turn away from your sins and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, so that your sins will be forgiven; and you will receive God's gift, the Holy Spirit. Ro 6:4 - By our baptism, then, we were buried with him and shared his death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from death by the glorious power of the Father, so also we might live a new life. 1Pe 3:21 - which was a symbol pointing to baptism, which now saves you. It is not the washing off of bodily dirt, but the promise made to God from a good conscience. It saves you through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, Col 2:12 - For when you were baptized, you were buried with Christ, and in baptism you were also raised with Christ through your faith in the active power of God, who raised him from death. |
||||||
3 | Are we back to the absurd view...? | 2 Timothy | Reformer Joe | 80999 | ||
Know what else is an interesting read? http://www.studybibleforum.com/termsreview.php Does your harassing violation of the Terms of Use and false witness bring glory to the God you claim to be representing? Just go away. This is the kind of thing people lose their Internet accounts over, for starters... --Joe! |
||||||
4 | Are we back to the absurd view...? | 2 Timothy | disciplermeam | 81009 | ||
Joe! Maybe you can explain to me why a you may post your opinions all day long, even though your 'unabashed' Calvinism is a divisive as any doctrine? Day in and day out you press your ridiculous doctrine onto any and all. It is an odious doctrine and I've let you know that. But have you gotten any warnings to stop? I doubt it. My opinions are mine. I quote scripture and you quote Calvin. Who is right? I always act in a way that brings glory to God. Matthew 28:18-20 is the same baptism as Mark 16:16 is the same baptism as Acts 2:38 is the same baptism as Acts 8:12 is the same baptism as Acts 22:16 is the same baptism as Romans 6:3-5 is the same baptism as Galatians 3:266,27 is the same baptism as Colossians 2:12 is the same baptism as 1 Peter 3:21. Good day. As far as the names go, it's all anonymous. So you've given yourself away as being on the inside. I assume by your other question that you also represent the legal arm of the Lockman foundation? This must be the reason you may post without impunity the divisive stuff you do. |
||||||
5 | Are we back to the absurd view...? | 2 Timothy | Reformer Joe | 81013 | ||
" Maybe you can explain to me why a you may post your opinions all day long, even though your 'unabashed' Calvinism is a divisive as any doctrine?" Because while it is certainly a doctrine which not everyone agrees with (like yours), I do actually post about other things. Click on my name below and look at my posts. You will see that I can actually post without mentioning Reformed doctrine at all. Is the same true for you and baptism? You have made your point regarding baptism, and now you have taken it upon yourself to commandeer every thread, whether it has anything to do with baptism or not, and flood the Forum with your view. "I quote scripture and you quote Calvin." I don't quote Scripture? ;) "Matthew 28:18-20 is the same baptism..." You have made your point, and I agree with you, as a matter of fact. Why do you think repeating this statement in every single one of your posts is going to make it more convincing? "As far as the names go, it's all anonymous. So you've given yourself away as being on the inside. I assume by your other question that you also represent the legal arm of the Lockman foundation?" No, that was just a courteous notice in case you were not aware. While I am in no way affiliated with the Lockman Foundation, I do have to read through your spamming to get to something worthy of a reply. It is simply dishonoring to God to carry on the way you are, even if you are theologically correct. --Joe! |
||||||