Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Doesn't it say that God would cause evil | 2 Sam 12:11 | RWC | 16455 | ||
Good day, I am not sure how this passage could reasonably be understood as an anthropormorphism. It is, seemingly at least, a direct statement of what God was going to do. When God is said to repent or change His mind, it is, I think, always in response to a change in the way that humans are responding to Him. And I'm not sure that I would call that an anthropormorphism either. Anthropormorphism is, I believe, a figure of speech (ie. not to be taken litterally) where a human characteristic is figuratively applied to God in order to make a particular point. I don't see how that could be true of these two verses. If I am missing something here, please show me what it is. Have a good day. Bob |
||||||
2 | Doesn't it say that God would cause evil | 2 Sam 12:11 | userdoe220 | 16461 | ||
I would agree with you. I was just being a little Facetious. It seems like when we come across a passage that doesn't fit our Theology we make up a new term in order to explain away the passage. It seems like many, not all, never stop to ask the question, "why is this passage considered....? You fill in the blank with a "theological" term. Got to run. |
||||||