Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | A thought about the Flood | Bible general Archive 2 | greentwiga | 141199 | ||
"It is said that no valid evolutionary scientist believes man evolved from a non-human life form. Yet evolution of man from an ooze of muck and mire is still in our textbooks, is still taught in our schools and colleges, still presented to the public as a viable answer to creation of man." Where do you get this???? Have you suddenly declared 99.99 percent of evolutionary scientists invalid? I know many and do not know any that disagree with the idea man evolved from a non-human life form. I do not say they are right, just that they all believe it with a very few exceptions. Your first paragraph is an interesting statement. I have no problems with it. The second and thord paragraphs are also very valid. The first sentance of the last paragraph has repetition of doubtful information. It is statements like that that I object to. Greentwiga |
||||||
2 | A thought about the Flood | Bible general Archive 2 | EdB | 141207 | ||
Greentwiga I said, “it is said,” not that I say or declare anything. I have been reading a series of articles on evolution in the past 4 to 5 years where leading evolutionary scientist are beginning to doubt the theory of evolution for various valid reasons. In one article and I can’t give the quote or the author, it was reported that the leading evolutionary scientist have quietly admitted that evolution theory had serious flaws. A rather recent article in Time or US News and World Report quoted what they described a leading scientist in evolution as saying He and many of his colleagues have reached the conclusion that evolution does not explain the formation of man but out of a desire not to jeopardize research grants have not be forthcoming with their conclusions. I personally know of one man I would consider an expert that was involved in the study that has since proven to himself and his research group that evolution does not explain man’s creation and they have since abandoned the project and moved on. Two of the biggest flaws in evolution are recent discoveries in DNA and ever nagging question why haven’t we seen continued micro-evolution (vertical or interspecies evolution) but only examples of macro-evolution (horizontal or intraspecies evolution)? EdB |
||||||
3 | A thought about the Flood | Bible general Archive 2 | greentwiga | 141244 | ||
Thanks for the clarification. | ||||||