Subject: The APOCALYPSE CODE. |
Bible Note: Rick: Have you ever personally read any of Hanegraaff's books? I do not agree with everything he says, but I have not codemmed his writing as less valuable than "toilet paper" for which I think is the ultimate slure one could make. In amy of the Bibles or Greek I have studied no where have I found that one must believe in Dispensationalisn. I would call Hagee's qualification for salvation as a lie from the pit. Can you please explain to me how he comes to this conclusion? I know for a fact that salvation is not dependant on beliefe in despensationalism, by the Bibles I read anyway. I know that Hanegraaff has confronted those he feels were or have been in error. Benny Hinn actually repented on the air, but he went back to the errors again. I welcomed your response to my question, but I did ask for anyone who had read the book. Or maybe I was not clear on that I am not sure. While stating an opinion I try to quote from some knowledgable source, there by having some backup for my opinion. I attempted to point out that to destroy a mans work especially degrading it the value of less than worth cleaning up human waste. Rick if anyone said that about the book you are soon to publish, I would say the very samething to them as well. Too often Christians shoot their wounded, and protect those who are false teachers. Perhaps my understanding of some of these false teachers might help. Jesus said those who are not against me are for me. (that's my words) These teachers that Hank Hanegraaff mentions may well be saved, but have a serious flaw, and are misleading some very trustion souls who have not learned to read the Word for themselves. The Holy father knows that, and our duty is to attempt to correct thes flawed teachers. If these flawed teachers refuse to repent then they will face the Father and He will take care of it. I would have no objectio to you making spechic statements about Hanegraaff if you gave me a specfic case in point, not a general statement. I see using illistrations to discribe your opinion as a word picture. The word picture you used about the toilet paper is so crude and I think you have a better vocabulary that you could have made a better word picture than that. Am I wrong? How do we as Christians deal with John 13:34 and 35. Is this not a a core theology or doctrine for us as believers? I used two pages of space to awaken your heart without showing disrespect, and brotherly love. I maybe long winded, but I only can think of a very few notes I've posted that I have cared enough about someone to make such a huge effort. I honestly believe you are a brother who is worth the exortation and time it took to write you. I am not a dispensationalist. I have studied this theory, and I feel it is worthy to dialogue about, but not to draw such conclusions that if one see's the end of times different that one is not saved. That a false theology. If someone would critise say Honk on the forum unfairly I would defend him. Just to mention there have been times that that very thing did happem Others have also defended others on the forum to help resolve a misunderstanding. So please see that I defend at times when there is less than proof positive about a statement. The Bible school and the Seminary I went to have both drifted into liberalism, and I cannot defend their directions. I am open to correction myself, and I have been corrected on this forum as well. Criticism is accepted by me and I have grown thanks to those who took the time to care enough to bring it to my attention. I wish you would at least read the APOCALYPSE CODE. I think you would be amazed at what Hanegraaff has to say. I believe this book to be a work that will be used for many years into the furture. Blessings to you Rick. I hope this helps you see I care enough to spend the time to write you. justme |