Subject: The second coming of Jesus |
Bible Note: Darcy! Good point! And once someone says that the historical, grammatical meaning of the Scripture is not the true meaning, then he makes it impossible to ascertain what the meaning is. Because if we cannot understand the text by the normal use of English words and grammar, how would we ever know what it meant? Which is not to say that the Bible doesn't use figurative language. It does. And it's usually plain and clear in the context when figurative language is being used. It's like the old saying regarding Bible interpretation: When the plain (or literal) sense makes good sense seek no other sense lest it be nonsense. Grace to you, Radioman2 |