Prior Chapter | Prior Verse | Next Verse | Next Chapter | Next Book | Viewing NASB and Amplified 2015 | |
NASB | Genesis 6:2 that the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose. |
AMPLIFIED 2015 | Genesis 6:2 that the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful and desirable; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose and desired. |
Subject: Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? |
Bible Note: Greetings in the Lord, If the lines of seth, at the time of Gen 6, were so holy, why 120 years after this fact was the world destroyed in a flood??? only 8 people out of the "noble" lines of seth remained faithful after 120 years??I would suggest all people who truly are seeking after truth test their "traditions" vs. the word. This sad stretch of I Tim 5:21 is exactly why a topic much be researched, and diligently prayed over before it is introduced as doctrine. This section of scripture is the form of an oath about not prefering one brother before another(elders/witnesses, not that angles cannot fall from grace. Jesus did not come in the form of an angle and die, He came as a man. Therefore, angles do not have grace. Consequently, elect here better translates as chosen. Chosen or elected for what? A statement or oath being made before them as a witness? perhaps angles that did keep their first estate. The Bible shows that angles have physical bodies, look at the angles at Sodom and Gahmora, they were physical. An angle one night had dinner with 185,000 samaratins before decimateing them. Oh heck, we have entertained angles unawares. Demons seek embodyment, angles have bodies. Fallen angles, were still angles...therefore, they are as physical. Here is something else to chew on, through scripture prove Angles and Demons are the same. one has a body...one seeks embodyment. There's that tradition again. Further more, why would the lines of seth, lay with the daughter's of men be big news? That's been going on since the garden. By the way... the daughter's of men, I hate to break this to you, is translated a little to loosely. The Hebrew word used here is "Benoth Adam". Better translated, "Daughter's of Adam".Seth is from Adam also. Why would this need be stated here? In closeing, I never stated Moses wrote Job...I do believe he wrote Genesis however. I actually believe there is a possibility that Job is a pre-flood book. This is due to alot of conditions, and animals that are spoken of in this book. One thing we do know though, is Job was actually pened before Gen. Even though Gen is an earlier progression, but The Lord is quite mysterious like that. Brother, I took on the same Joking tone with you, but please realize, as a brother, I hold you in the highest respect. Jesus is the Blood that flows between you and me, and we are the same body. Something i wasn't going to share at this point, but I feel called to.Gen 4:26 is mis- translated, the scripture does not read "Then began Men to call upon the name of the Lord", it actually infers profaneing the name of the Lord. If you think I am Mistaken, please seek this on your own. There was a time I held the same view as you. In Christ Always, Servant7 |