Results 1 - 4 of 4
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | John Reformed | 99933 | ||
Dear EdB, The fault in your arguement can be illustrated by the doctrine of the Trinity. This doctrine was written by fallible men. According to your line of reason, The doctrine of the Trinity must be unscriptural and banned from discussion on the forum. John |
||||||
2 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | EdB | 99988 | ||
John I believe there is a great difference between the doctrine of the Trinity and election of infants. The Trinity is clearly demonstrated in scripture while the doctrine of election of infants is so obscure only a few (by few I mean a minority of Christianity) have ever claimed to see it. So I think your comparison is without foundation. I further believe my assessment of the WCF was fair and does not contain denominational bias as you accuse. EdB |
||||||
3 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | John Reformed | 100016 | ||
The mere fact that you believe believe that the WCF is unsound in it's theology does not mean that it is indeed unsound. I've read The WCF and I've read the posts of EdB. Meaning you no disrespect Ed, but believe me, it's not even a contest as to whose theology I'm inclined to believe. :-) By the way, what they wrote caused many of them their lives. The threat we face pales in comparison. John |
||||||
4 | IS there any answers out there? | NT general Archive 1 | EdB | 100029 | ||
John I never said the WCF was unsound. I said, "what was said, "was that the WCF was not Scripture nor Biblical."" It was written by man from man's interpretation of scripture so it is nothing more or less than man's opinion. I prefer to discuss the Bible not man's perception of the Bible. A point you seem to keep missing. As for you not liking my theology is exactly why there is vanilla and chocolate ice cream. However the point you miss is, people get tired of someone telling them they are wrong eating vanilla and starting endless circular debates over the issue. I will say one thing by the fact you said, "I've read The WCF and I've read the posts of EdB. Meaning you no disrespect Ed, but believe me, it's not even a contest as to whose theology I'm inclined to believe" shows one thing you do take every opportunity you can to drag any discussion to a personal level. Why attack my personal theology just because I don't agree with you? You most certainly did mean disrespect here. EdB |
||||||