Results 1 - 6 of 6
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Who is going into the millenium? | Bible general Archive 1 | EdB | 4343 | ||
Who is going into the millennium? The saints are raptured so they are in heaven. Tribulation saints will be martyred so they too are in heaven. Everyone else took the mark of the beast so they could eat. Who is left? |
||||||
2 | Who is going into the millenium? | Bible general Archive 1 | EdB | 5983 | ||
If you want to see an ignorant and a closed mind in action take a look at this exchange of information. Who ever went through this string and red flagged Orthodoxy's updates is in just such a state. As a Pre-Millennial dispensationist I do not agree with Orthodoxy’s position. However his position is a valid and was a traditional view that was held by most Christians until less than 150 years ago and since Hal Lindsey and a few others made popular the Pre Millennium dispensational view. To Red flag comments because they disagree with your thinking, provided they are based on a valid Biblical interpretation, is absurd and displays great ignorance. I think whoever did this is direct opposition to the idea of this forum and the red flags. To me the red flags were put in place to warn others of a totally non-biblical point of view not one that merely disagrees with the rater. I’m not defending Orthodoxy in any way. I’m defending the exchange of information in this forum from someone that has no understanding of the Preterist’s point of view and has allowed that ignorance to close their mind to another possible view of something that open to interpretation. |
||||||
3 | Would you explain your action? | Bible general Archive 1 | EdB | 5998 | ||
Would whoever has red flagged Orthodoxy's updates in this subject string please explain to me why you consider them inappropriate to the discussion? Or why they are unbiblical? Or even why you consider them not good? As far as being controversial or biased I feel safe in saying probably all of this forum would meet that criteria to some degree. Unless we are patting each other on the back, most updates are controversial and I think everyone carries some demoninational bias. I would really like to hear an explaination for red flagging the first three categories. Does that person have the courage to step up and explain themselves? |
||||||
4 | Would you explain your action? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 6006 | ||
Dear EdB, I did not vote on this thread, but the idea behind voting was to have a way to point out a *remarkably* biased or controversial opinion. The leadership at Lockman can use this as a way to 'feel the pulse' of the participants. I think that many times it is not the content so much as the attitude that would bring one to *remark* on a posting. In Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
5 | What is the point of the flags? | Bible general Archive 1 | EdB | 6020 | ||
I can agree with the intent I just disagree with the use. In this case a valid point was being made and since it was in response to my question and since I felt no attitude how did someone else decide it was Inappropriate, Unbiblical, Bad, Controversial and Biased. I will yield to Biased for it definely came from a person of the pretrist presuasion however I imagine the person that red flagged it was biased to dispensationalism. So what is the point of those flags? | ||||||
6 | What is the point of the flags? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 6047 | ||
Dear EdB, I guess the point is that Lockman has made available a means of expressing our feelings toward a thread of postings or an individual's opinions. After all, only one vote (per posting) was cast, and look at how easy it was to change the color with another vote :-) Some people are impervious to confrontation, some dread it. You and orthodoxy are still free to continue your thread, nobody is stopping you. We have been given the choice of replying or not, reading or not, and voting or not, none of which take away the privilege of others. Peace and blessings in Jesus' name, charis |
||||||