Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | can you lose your salvation | Bible general Archive 1 | zach† | 38348 | ||
Joe; No need to take offense. My reply was to kalos, but I welcome your response as well. Your accucastions of saying I am mis-representing McArthur for merely quoting him are uncalled for, since what i quoted was from him out of his book. John McArthur Jr. Is a great preacher, and I regard him highly, yet I don't think EVERYTHING he says is totally Bibical. I compare what McArthur says by what scripture says, not vice versa. Also John McArthur played a part in my receiving Christ Jesus as Savior and Lord, but as I continued to grow in the faith and as i continued to read and listen to McArthur some obvious Scriptural errors in his teaching became increasingly apparent. I believe that some of his teaching is denominational rather than scriptural as do many others besides myself. Nevertheless, the Bible is my final authority for all faith and practice. And if that means I must reject some teachings of men, then so be it. |
||||||
2 | can you lose your salvation | Bible general Archive 1 | kalos | 38369 | ||
Zacht: In one of your recent posts you write: "No need to take offense. My reply was to kalos, but I welcome your response as well." I originally wrote: " The believer's assurance/security "should hold no interest to you" and "the answer is not of any importance." ??? I couldn't disagree more. ... As for the Eternal Security vs. Eternal Insecurity debate, I don't care to get into that." I stated in plain English that the point of my posting was to disagree with the statements "The believer's assurance/security "should hold no interest to you" and "the answer is not of any importance." In your reply to me you go on to argue against the doctrine of Eternal Security, even though in my post to which you replied I was NOT arguing for or against Eternal Security. Now you allege to Joe, "No need to take offense. My reply was to kalos, but I welcome your response as well." How was your note a reply to me, when your note had virtually nothing to do with the point of my note? |
||||||
3 | can you lose your salvation | Bible general Archive 1 | zach† | 38377 | ||
kalo's The reason for my reply to your post was in response to a Charles Stanley quote that you posted. I took the liberty for not only you, but for other individuals who might come here and then be able to see what else Stanley says concerning "Eternal Security" Grace and peace be multiplied unto thee zach† |
||||||