Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Verification on Charles Taze Russell | Col 2:9 | RR144 | 82639 | ||
Let's stick with Russell, the Watchtower of today have made many claims of Russell that were simply not true, they have simply rewritten their history to make it seem that Russell was a Jehovah's Witness in harmony with their theology of today, this is simply not true, the two are separate and distinct. Because many in his day believed he was "That Servant" does not in itself mean he taught he was "that servant." I'll save you the time, Russell in all his years, NEVER, I repeat, NEVER taught that he was "that Servant" of Matthew 24:45-48. You will never find such a statement from him, believe me. |
||||||
2 | Verification on Charles Taze Russell | Col 2:9 | Reformer Joe | 82749 | ||
"Let's stick with Russell, the Watchtower of today have made many claims of Russell that were simply not true, they have simply rewritten their history to make it seem that Russell was a Jehovah's Witness in harmony with their theology of today, this is simply not true, the two are separate and distinct." Well, we aren't talking about the Watchtower of today, but rather the Watchtower of 1916. The Watchtower today agrees with you that Russell is not that servant. 'I'll save you the time, Russell in all his years, NEVER, I repeat, NEVER taught that he was "that Servant" of Matthew 24:45-48.' Whom did he teach was/is that servant, then? By the way, there is at least one group identifying themselves as "Bible students" who attest that Russell was indeed that servant: http://www.biblestudents.org/presence/signs_servant.htm --Joe! |
||||||