Results 1 - 7 of 7
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Verification on Charles Taze Russell | Col 2:9 | RR144 | 82696 | ||
And as I said, "Let's stick with Russell, the Watchtower of today have made many claims of Russell that were simply not true, they have simply rewritten their history..." The Watchtower of 12/1/1916 is one of these rewritten statements. As I stated before, you will not find in any of Russell's writings, where he personally made such a claim in print. the article you quote from was not written by Russell, as he was dead by this time, it was written by "Judge" Rutherford, and it is hearsay, and "hearsay' never holds up in a court of law. Try again! :) |
||||||
2 | Verification on Charles Taze Russell | Col 2:9 | Hank | 82702 | ||
Speaking of a court of law, what do you say to the creedence of the divorce suit that Russell's wife brought against her husband on the grounds of marital infidelity? A copy of the transcript of this court testimony which was given on Thursday, April 26, 1906 in the Allegheny County, Pennsylvania courthouse can be accessed by going to http://www.paulblizard.com/russ1.html .... Is his obsession with the occult and Egyptology also a smear campaign perpetrated by Rutherford and other successors who aspired to discredit him when they usurped his post as keeper of the Watchtower? Or is it not a fact that both Russell and his band of successors down to the present day are all of them religious heretics, wild-eyed fanatics, and false teachers of the first rank? --Hank | ||||||
3 | Verification on Charles Taze Russell | Col 2:9 | RR144 | 82709 | ||
Sorry, what you have is an article from the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, the equivalent of todays National Enquirer. They spent most of thei time sensationalizing the news to sell papers. It was a relatinship like that of J. Jonah jameson and his Daily Bugle and Spiderman. I have the actual court transcripts and nothing is further from the truth. Maria Russell never charged Charles Russell with marital infidelity, I guess that's something the Watch the Tower site ommitted. Russell was never obsessed with the occult or egyptology. Did he believe that the Great Pyramid was divinely inspired by God? He sure did, as well as many other prominent ministers of his day and many today. |
||||||
4 | Verification on Charles Taze Russell | Col 2:9 | Hank | 82713 | ||
So, I presume you are prepared to state that Russell's divorce is fiction, and that he never called the doctrine of the Trinity a lie inspired by Satan. Why are you going to such lengths to defend Charles Taze Russell on this forum? The only reason I can deduce is that you either associate yourself with, or are sympathetic to, the splinter group calling themselves International Bible Students who are Russell loyalists. Am I much off the mark in my deduction? --Hank | ||||||
5 | Verification on Charles Taze Russell | Col 2:9 | RR144 | 82715 | ||
The issue you brought up was not about Russell's divorce but the reason for the divorce, I was refuting that faulty reasoning. Did Charles and Maria separate in 1897 and make it legal in 1907? Yes, they certainly did. Do I agree with Russell that the doctrine of the trinity is a lie inspired by atan? I certainly do. Am I sympathetic to Russell? I certainly am. |
||||||
6 | Verification on Charles Taze Russell | Col 2:9 | Hank | 82718 | ||
Then do you also deny the deity of Christ? --Hank | ||||||
7 | Verification on Charles Taze Russell | Col 2:9 | RR144 | 82743 | ||
No, I deny that Jesus is God Almighty! | ||||||