Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | What constitutes 'abuse' on the forum? | Acts 17:11 | gracefull | 94499 | ||
It has come to my attention that threads are restricted when a forum member 'reports abuse'. I would like all forum members to clarify the term abuse. In the thread 93133 several MEMBER CONDUCT rules were violated BEFORE my post. Then after much proding, I posted a portion of an apologetic that offered scriptural interpretation and commentaries from men of different affiliations, for discussion and someone THEN decided to declare 'abuse'.Please remember that disagreement does not constitute divisive... Did my posts constitute abuse? Posting a paper for discussion that is scripturally based though in disagreement with the commonly accepted theology? Isn't this forum a Bible Study forum? This thread was suddenly considered 'abuse' because... 1. You were affraid of the challenge. 2. You feel that if you do not agree you have the right to 'pass judgement'. I wonder what would happen to the forum if everytime someone posted something someone else did not agree with, abuse was reported? The forum would become a 'dead sea' and die. Is that what the rest of the forum members want? I would like very much for other forum members to respond to this post and voice their opinion..should a forum member be allowed to 'report abuse' simply because their beliefs differ or because they do not like the discussion? God bless Ps the thread # was 93133 and my posts were # 94397, 94403, and 94404 for any who may not have been involved in the discussion. If you check out my post and find that it does not have adequate scripture for a forum discussion or is written in a divisive manner, let me know. Remember, disagreement does not constitute divisive. If it did, the forum should shut it's doors now. God bless |
||||||
2 | What constitutes 'abuse' on the forum? | Acts 17:11 | Makarios | 94566 | ||
Greetings Gracefull, Although I do not know who it was who took this action, I do support it. Any post on this form that puts our Lord's name in the same sentence with "emanicipated wormy spirit" is not a worthy post to be added to this Forum's literature, and it has justly been dealt with. Beyond anything, this Forum is to reflect respect for the Bible and for the Lord who spoke our world into existence. This Forum has long existed before you happened on to it, and it will go on after you leave it. Therefore, the challenge for you and I is to leave a legacy on this Forum that is worth reading by both our contemporaries and those who follow us. Makarios |
||||||
3 | What constitutes 'abuse' on the forum? | Acts 17:11 | gracefull | 94587 | ||
Makarios, Thank you for your response. "Any post on this form that puts our Lord's name in the same sentence with "emanicipated wormy spirit" is not a worthy post to be added to this Forum's literature, and it has justly been dealt with." I only have one problem with your statement.... This was not my post. This was not the topic of the thread. The actual post that posted this quote was NOT banned. If you look at my post that seemingly prompted the 'abuse' charge..The post was an apologetic DISCUSSING the topic of Jesus descending to Hell, and not the post radioman2 posted regarding statements made by Kenneth Copeland. Ed asked me to address the question of whether Jesus 'suffered in Hell' or not. I did not post the quotes by specific WOF teachers. But rather continually requested a scriptural discussion of the topic at hand. Did you read MY post that prompted the 'abuse' charge? Was the offending statement in any of my posts? No. "Any post on this form that puts our Lord's name in the same sentence with "emanicipated wormy spirit" is not a worthy post to be added to this Forum's literature, and it has justly been dealt with." Then MY posts should not have been the one banned... God bless |
||||||