Results 1 - 4 of 4
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | How many generations betw Exodus-Solomon | Matt 1:17 | Jim Estes | 207208 | ||
Hi stjohn, Was Jesus an Israelite or a Nazarene? It doesn't appear you read the thread. Of course Ruth was a Moabitess, from the Land of Moab. As for Rahab the Harlot, this all started with a timeline which shows she would have been about 96 years old at the time of the birth of Boaz. That timeline remains unchallenged. If it is true, then all the rest is academic. If I am wrong, show me HOW I'm wrong. It certainly wouldn't be the first time. Jim |
||||||
2 | How many generations betw Exodus-Solomon | Matt 1:17 | Val | 207215 | ||
Which bible passages are you using to show the age of Rahab? | ||||||
3 | How many generations betw Exodus-Solomon | Matt 1:17 | DocTrinsograce | 207220 | ||
Dear Val, I was serious when I asked if you would explain to bowler how one uses the inductive study method for the passage he asks about in post #207078. I am trying to persuade him of the importance of context. The observation and interpretation methods would surface an answer for him that would accomplish more than all my pontificating. In Him, Doc |
||||||
4 | How many generations betw Exodus-Solomon | Matt 1:17 | bowler | 207231 | ||
Doc I went back to see what we were discussing. I would be happy to hear from you or Val, whoever that saint is, or anyone else on inductive study methods for post #207078.:-) I don't believe I heard you correctly! Ponificate, Pontificate? Oh, no, no, no! That is not how I view people who carefully state what they beleive in graceful terms! No matter how many times, as long as they do not apply gracefulness to the art of "graceful" insult! Let the Liberty of Christ prevail here, I am open to discussion! Now, about what you are saying in this last post Doc you made further up the branch - That there are things you do not agree with from some of the great theologians. In the instance of John Calvin for instance I happen to agree with you. In a totaly irrelevant post to this one I tried nicely as I could to differentiate between quoting the direct source theologians and quoting those who have derived creeds. That those who have made creeds whose work has partialy depended on the original source, I usually have no problem with depending on the creed. It is the source theologian's original unchanged, uninterpreted work that I often find some trouble with. Like elements of Luther's Small and Great Catechism, like the parts of the content of John Calvin's Institutes in addressing the heretics. Each has elements that show certain beliefs I cannot hold. I agree with you in this branch that the whole line of "Great Divines" have gotten this one right. If Mathew and Hebrews and James are all talking about the only Rahab that exists in the OT, then it can be none other than the Harlot. I will post you about inductive study and such in the appropriate post. I look forward to hearing from you about it. Just a worthless son. blessings abound, bowler |
||||||