Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Makarios | 30605 | ||
Greetings Servant7! So in other words, you possess knowledge that far exceeds the sum of all the English Bible translators' knowledge put together and that you can lecture those translators fully until they "get it right"? :-) So all of the translators in the history of the translation of the English Bible (even the translators of the KJV) are in clear and absolute error when rendering Genesis 6:4 as "sons of God" rather than as 'angels', as you hold? Wow! From what background do YOU come from, and how long have YOU studied the Bible? You must have many, many degrees and certifications, no doubt! And you must know Greek and Hebrew better than those who wrote the Old and New testaments themselves!! You must be someone in GREAT demand, since I am sure that you are consulted at each and every turn during the translation processes of every new Bible that is rendered in English. Do you not see anything "amiss" here? :-) Blessings to you, Nolan |
||||||
2 | Are the "sons of God" pre-Fall children? | Gen 6:2 | Servant7 | 30759 | ||
I can see how an individual might take me that way, if they feel threatened or have an agenda. I feel neither about you, so I cannot figure out why your postings come off so harsh. Now you are right in the fact that you do not know my background, nor I yours. I will say i have spent some time studying this specific topic...it's quite interesting though, you must certainly agree:) Now in regards to your "dig". Any begining student can pick up a Hebrew concordance and see somethig is not right here. And this is not just my interpretation(I hate to do this), I know theologians and PhD's who infer to this belief( also born again believers like myself and you). And yes Hebrew is one of the studies i am persuing. I would encourage you to research the early church, you will find that the "lines of Seth" theory did not take root until then(4th century B.C). You and I (from reading your post's I get this) are after the same thing...Truth. This is the only reason I have fenced with you this far. I encourage much study on this topic, for both of us. This journey does not end until we are perfected in Christ. What does all of this mean...nothing, for all of this account's for naught next to The simplicity of the Gospel. My degrees do not, and will not matter. Let's be real... The Lord's foolishness is far above our greatest wisdom. In Christ, Servant7 |
||||||