Subject: How can moses say about his burrial? |
Bible Note: ischus I know all the arguments about Mark 16:9-20 but the fact remains no new theology is introduced there nor is there any error per say. I know a lot of people have taken liberty with this passage and made all kinds of claims but the fact remains most of what is there was played out by the apostles as seen in the Book of Acts. Now for John 8:1-11 the men in the camp in which I pitch my tent hold to the belief that this passage is authentic. There is a wide-spread conviction among textual critics that this narrative represents a factual episode in the ministry of Jesus. As for wrote them, I see nothing in either text that presents evidence that anyone other than the person charged with writing the entire book is the one that penned them. In any case the thoughts in both of the above two passages I believe were inspired by the God. I also think you have sat too long under the teaching of men that view the Bible more as text book than the living word of God. As I have said I have sat there myself and when I was young and frisky I too held to a way of thinking similar to yours. However once I began to focus on God the significance of the textual criticisms began to fade. And as my relationship went from head knowledge to heart knowledge the more I saw all the so called proofs were nothing more than that "so called". I think your confusing me with Hank since I don’t recall you ever mentioning these two passages to me before. EdB |