Prior Book | Prior Chapter | Prior Verse | Next Verse | Next Chapter | Next Book | Viewing NASB and Amplified 2015 | |
NASB | Matthew 5:39 "But I say to you, do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also. |
AMPLIFIED 2015 | Matthew 5:39 "But I say to you, do not resist an evil person [who insults you or violates your rights]; but whoever slaps you on the right cheek, turn the other toward him also [simply ignore insignificant insults or trivial losses and do not bother to retaliate--maintain your dignity, your self-respect, your poise]. [Luke 6:29, 30; Rom 12:17-21] |
Bible Question: I have a question regarding Matthew chapter 5 verse 38 to 42. My Bible study group was reviewing the part of verse 38 where Jesus says, "If someone strikes you on the cheek, turn to him the other also." One of our study members said a Jewish teacher told her that you would need to understand Jewish history to understand this sentance and that turning the other cheek was a form of insult at that time, in other words, if someone insulted you by slapping you, not appreciating what you're giving, you'd be basically righting them off by turning the other cheek. Does anyone know if this is true? It does seem the Christian is to draw the line when he's determined continuing to give would be unappreciated by the receiver such as in Matthew 7:6 where it says not to cast pearls before swine. Thanks, Chusarcik |
Bible Answer: Greetings Chusarcik! I have heard that interpetation but I don't buy it. Here is why: Each of the items mentioned in Mt. 5:38-42 deals with an issue of civil rights. The issue is one of personal civil rights. In contrast to the Jews who taught vengence, Jesus calls us to be 'extra mile' people. For instance, striking someone on the check was a great personal public insult. The 'eye for eye' philosphy would be to strike them back and avenge one's self of this affront. But, Jesus said to turn to him the other check as well and endure the insult again. Further, people were given legal protection against having their outer clock taken. For many people, this was both their coat and bedding. It was a legal right to keep it. The 'eye for eye' approach would be to insist upon our rights and not allow anyone to take what is rightfully ours. However, Jesus said to let him have your cloak as well. Finally, Roman soldiers were legally allowed to force people to carry their burdens for them for 1 mile. The 'eye for eye' approach would be to carry the burden for just 1 mile, but Jesus said to go 2 miles. The whole point of the passage is that Christians should be the kind of people who do not insist upon their 'rights'. We are to be, as Phil. 2:3-4 says, who consider others better than ourselves and look out for the interest of others, rather than ourselves. Your Brother in Christ, Tim Moran |