Results 81 - 100 of 3169
|
||||||
Results from: Answers On or After: Thu 12/31/70 Author: kalos Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
81 | ... | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 167248 | ||
TJ: This is not a political forum. If you wish to swap political opinions, you are advised to find a forum whose purpose is to discuss politics. This is not that forum. There's enough arguing over religion here. We don't need to argue over politics, too. --Kalos |
||||||
82 | ... | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 167263 | ||
This is not a political forum. If you wish to swap political opinions, you are advised to find a forum whose purpose is to discuss politics. This is not that forum. | ||||||
83 | where is "do not seek out your own."? | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 167753 | ||
Duplicate post. | ||||||
84 | where is "do not seek out your own."? | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 167755 | ||
duplicate post |
||||||
85 | Gift of speaking in tongues for all? | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 168000 | ||
A miracle of hearing? ____________________ 'But then when you come to I Corinthians 14, it is definitely speaking and not hearing. So, why would you have tongues...why would you even use the expression “languages” if you’re not talking about languages and you’re talking about the hearing miracle?...it is very clear that he’s talking about a language spoken, not a language heard.' ____________________ ['The following "Question" was asked by a member of the congregation at Grace Community Church in Panorama City, California, and "Answered" by their pastor, John MacArthur Jr.'] 'Question 'In the account in Acts 2 of Pentecost, as I read my New American Standard Bible, over and over I come to the feeling that this miracle was in the hearing. I’ve never heard anybody comment on that and I just would like to hear your opinion of that. 'Answer 'There are those who believe that it was a miracle of hearing; there are those who affirm that. There are quite a few who would because they say, “everyone heard in his own language.” I don’t hold that view, and I don’t think that view holds up very well, particularly when you recognize that they were all “filled with the Holy Spirit,” verse four, “and began to speak with other languages.” That seems to me to be a fairly open-and-shut case for a miracle of speaking rather than a miracle of hearing. (...) 'I believe it was a miracle of speaking rather than a miracle of hearing, particularly when you see the cloven tongues of fire and when you compare the rest of Acts and the other phenomena that occurred, which seems clearly to be a speaking phenomena rather than a hearing. 'But then when you come to I Corinthians 14, it is definitely speaking and not hearing. So, why would you have tongues...why would you even use the expression “languages” if you’re not talking about languages and you’re talking about the hearing miracle? So, I don’t think that that really holds up very well, particularly if you want a consistent interpretation of the miracle of tongues in Corinthians; it is very clear that he’s talking about a language spoken, not a language heard.' 'Added to Bible Bulletin Board's "MacArthur’s Questions and Answers" by: 'Tony Capoccia Bible Bulletin Board Box 119 Columbus, New Jersey, USA, 08022 Websites: www.biblebb.com and www.gospelgems.com Email: tony@biblebb.com Online since 1986' ____________________ http://www.biblebb.com/files/macqa/70-8-10.htm |
||||||
86 | Where does it say no sin is greater? | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 168288 | ||
Are all sins the same? 'The Bible gives us some guidance on this. It teaches that not all sins are the same. Some are more egregious than others. This is very clear in the Scriptures. Jesus said to Pilate, "He who delivered Me up to you has the greater sin" (John 19:11). According to Jesus, some sins are greater than others. 'Common sense alone tells us that stealing a pencil is not as serious a crime as taking someone's life. Make no mistake, it's still a sin, and even a small sin is enough to make us guilty before God. But all sin is not the same to God. He certainly does make distinctions.' ____________________ www.str.org/free/commentaries/ethics/lie.htm |
||||||
87 | Original NASB text (1977) | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 168743 | ||
You can purchase the NASB 1977 at: http://lockman.gospelcom.net/ catalog/index.php#original Also, you can buy virtually anything at www.ebay.com I did a search for, but did not find, the text of the NASB (1977) available online. |
||||||
88 | Matthew 4, Luke 5, Mark 1, John 1 | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 168932 | ||
DonCoryon: I am confused. There is not a single question mark (?) in your entire posting. Please clarify your question for me. Perhaps you could re-word it as a question. What is it exactly that you are wanting to know? Welcome to the forum. Grace to you, Kalos |
||||||
89 | Matthew 4, Luke 5, Mark 1, John 1 | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 168934 | ||
Jesus' First Meeting with Simon Peter (From the website '101 Cleared up "Contradictions" in the Bible') Jesus first met Simon Peter and Andrew by the Sea of Galilee (Matthew 4:18-22), or on the banks of the river Jordan (John 1:42-43)? (Category: misread the text) The accusation is that one Gospel records Jesus meeting Simon Peter and Andrew by the sea of Galilee, while the other says he met them by the river Jordan. However this accusation falls flat on its face as the different writers pick up the story in different places. Both are true. John 1:35 onwards says Jesus met them by the river Jordan and that they spent time with him there. Andrew (and probably Peter too) were disciples of John the Baptist. They left this area and went to Galilee, in which region was the village of Cana where Jesus then performed his first recorded miracle. "After this he went down to Capernaum with his mothers and brothers and disciples. There they stayed for a few days." John 2:12. Peter and Andrew were originally from a town named Bethsaida (John 2:44) but now lived in Capernaum (Matthew 8:14-15, Mark 1:30-31, Luke 4:38-39), a few miles from Bethsaida. They were fishermen by trade, so it was perfectly normal for them to fish when they were home during these few days (for at this time Jesus was only just beginning public teaching or healing). This is where Matthew picks up the story. As Peter and Andrew fish in the Lake of Galilee, Jesus calls them to follow him - to leave all they have behind and become his permanent disciples. Before this took place, he had not asked them, but they had followed him because of John the Baptist's testimony of him (John 1:35-39). Now, because of this testimony, plus the miracle in Cana, as well as the things Jesus said (John 1:47-51), as well as the time spent with the wisest and only perfect man who ever lived etc., it is perfectly understandable for them to leave everything and follow him. It would not be understandable for them to just drop their known lives and follow a stranger who appeared and asked them to, like children after the pied piper! Jesus did not enchant anyone - they followed as they realized who he was - the one all the prophets spoke of, the Messiah the son of God. ____________________ http://worthynews.com/ apologetics/101-36-40.htm |
||||||
90 | is this Faith in God or just confused? | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 168972 | ||
Is your cousin married to the man you are talking about, the kids' father? | ||||||
91 | Promises of God listed in the Bible. | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 169171 | ||
I personally recommend "The Bible Promise Book" New International Version (Barbour Publishing, Inc., MCMXC). "Description: When questions of faith arise, it's not always convenient to search through a cumbersome concordance to find just the right Bible verse. Here's a handy purse- or briefcase-sized source of guidance on issues like loneliness, gossip, courage, joy, faith, and salvation. Filled with encouraging Scripture, it's the perfect gift for new believers or seasoned saints! 173 pages, blue imitation leather from Barbour." Grace to you, Kalos |
||||||
92 | Church of Christ --- A cult?? | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 169616 | ||
Define "cult". When you ask about "the church of Christ" do you mean The Churches of Christ, The Christian Churches, or The Disciples of Christ? To read about these churches go to: www.equip.org/free/DC600.htm Grace to you, Kalos |
||||||
93 | WHEN WIL THE ANT-CHRIST COME TO EARTH | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 170157 | ||
Question: "DOES THE ANTI-CHRIST COME BEFORE OR AFTER THE GREAT TRIBULATION"? Answer: The Abomination of Desolation Matthew 24:15-16, 21 (ESV) 15 “So when you see the abomination of desolation spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), 16 then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. ...21 For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, and never will be. In Matthew 24 notice the sequence of events. First the abomination of desolation will be seen standing in the holy place, "then there will be GREAT TRIBULATION." How great will that tribulation be? It will be "such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, and never will be." The Man of Lawlessness 2 Thessalonians 2:1-4 (ESV) 2:1 Now concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered together to him, we ask you, brothers, 2 not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed, either by a spirit or a spoken word, or a letter seeming to be from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. 3 Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, 4 who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God. What is the sequence of events in 2 Thessalonians chapter 2? "That day" is the day when "the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered together to him" will take place. It is also called "the day of the Lord". What has to happen before "that day" comes? "For that day will not come, unless (1) the rebellion comes first, and (2) the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, (the Antichrist). So, according to these clear verses of Scripture, the Antichrist MUST come BEFORE the day of the Lord -- the great tribulation. Grace to you, Kalos |
||||||
94 | sermons online? | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 170226 | ||
www.oneplace.com Live and archived Christian broadcasts from radio stations across the country and from top speakers such as James Dobson, Chuck Swindoll, and Charles Stanley. Transcripts of sermons are also available here. At this website you can also access sermons by most, if not all, of the following: Greg Laurie, Woodrow Kroll, Adrian Rogers, "Concerned Women Today with Beverly LaHaye", Billy Graham, Dennis Rainey, Dr. James Dobson, John MacArthur, "Hope For The Heart" with June Hunt, Charles Stanley, Chuck Swindoll, "Janet Parshall's America", Josh McDowell, Ravi Zacharias, Jack Hayford, Kay Arthur, J. Vernon McGee, R.C. Sproul, "Revive Our Hearts" with Nancy Leigh DeMoss, John Ankerberg, D. James Kennedy, David Jeremiah. Grace to you, Kalos |
||||||
95 | Judas is called the son of perdition | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 170319 | ||
Son of perdition means "son of destruction". John 17:12 English Standard Version While I was with them, I kept them in your name, which you have given me. I have guarded them, and not one of them has been lost except the SON OF DESTRUCTION, that the Scripture might be fulfilled. 2Thessalonians 2:3 English Standard Version Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the SON OF DESTRUCTION [Greek the son of perdition (a Hebrew idiom)]. In the New King James Version the phrase "son of destruction" is translated "son of perdition". John 17:12 New King James Version While I was with them in the world, I kept them in Your name. Those whom You gave Me I have kept; and none of them is lost except the son of perdition, that the Scripture might be fulfilled. 2Thessalonians 2:3 New King James Version Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, The Amplified Bible amplifies the meaning of the term "son of perdition". John 17:12 The Amplified Bible While I was with them, I kept and preserved them in Your Name [ in the knowledge and worship of You]. Those You have given Me I guarded and protected, and not one of them has perished or is lost except the son of perdition [Judas Iscariot--the one who is now doomed to destruction, destined to be lost], that the Scripture might be fulfilled. AMPLIFIED 2 Thessalonians 2:3 Let no one deceive or beguile you in any way, for that day will not come except the apostasy comes first [unless the predicted great falling away of those who have professed to be Christians has come], and the man of lawlessness (sin) is revealed, who is the son of doom (of perdition), [Dan. 7:25; 8:25; I Tim. 4:1.] |
||||||
96 | Why do three of the 4 gospels mention Si | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 170642 | ||
duplicate question | ||||||
97 | Why do three of the 4 gospels mention Si | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 170644 | ||
duplicate question | ||||||
98 | differences | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 170694 | ||
You write: 'It seems if i were to ask a priest, a rabbi, a baptist, a mormon, etc to interpert the same bible passage, i would get 4 plus different versions. how can the word of god be so differently interperted?' A related question is, "What is the difference between Christianity and Judaism?" 'The all-important difference between Christianity and Judaism is the Person of Jesus Christ. Christianity teaches that Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecies of a coming Messiah / Savior (Isaiah 7:14; 9:6-7; Micah 5:2). Judaism often recognizes Jesus as a good teacher, and perhaps even a prophet of God. Judaism does not believe that Jesus was the Messiah. Taking it a step further, Christianity teaches that Jesus was God in the flesh (John 1:1,14; Hebrews 1:8). Christianity teaches that God became a human being in the Person of Jesus Christ so He could lay down His life to pay the price for our sins (Romans 5:8; 2 Corinthians 5:21). Judaism strongly denies that Jesus was God or that such a sacrifice was necessary. 'Jesus Christ is the all-important distinction between Christianity and Judaism. The Person and work of Jesus Christ is the one primary issue that Christianity and Judaism cannot agree upon.' Source: Question of the Week Week of April 9 - 15, 2006 http://studylight.org/col/que/ |
||||||
99 | Ray | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 171460 | ||
Amen. | ||||||
100 | What is effeminate | Bible general Archive 3 | kalos | 172040 | ||
When all else fails and everyone is finished guessing, it wouldn't be a bad idea to look it up in the dictionary. effeminate "1 : having feminine qualities untypical of a man : not manly in appearance or manner" Merriam-Webster Online (http://m-w.com/) Grace to you, Kalos |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [159] >> |