Results 581 - 600 of 729
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: charis Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
581 | JOE THROWS ONENESS INTO HERESY | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 4848 | ||
Dear RevC, While I respect your right to an opinion, I must say that your arguments against a Tri-Une God are illogical and emotional in nature. If even one scripture clearly shows one Person of the Godhead addressing another, the Jesus-is-God-is-the Holy Spirit argument falls apart. Yet, there are many. I will give one: "Therefore having been exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He has poured forth this which you both see and hear." Acts 2:33 NASB. These three distinct personalities are evident. Yes, the Trinity nature of God is a mystery, one that is revealed and is being revealed to the church. But your argument is mystical, 'having a spiritual meaning or reality that is neither apparent to the senses nor obvious to the intelligence.' (Webster) Blessings in Christ Jesus, charis. |
||||||
582 | once saved always saved? | NT general Archive 1 | charis | 4736 | ||
Dear Tim, I concur with my good colleague JVH0212 and congratulate you on a great answer. One small point, though, not about the content. I think you mean Arminian, a follower of Arminius, not Armenian, a person from Armenia. Blessings and peace upon you in Jesus' name, charis |
||||||
583 | Selfish or Self-interest? | Phil 1:23 | charis | 4724 | ||
Dear Lionstrong, I am at a loss. Perhaps it is just my inability to comprehend, but doesn't the above (mysterious, anonymous, scholarly, verbose? :-) quotation kind of make the same point I made? I stated that self-interest (akin to self-awareness in Christ) was fine, but selfishness (self-focus) was sinful. I have said that I am not altruistic, and am aware of self-interest, but desire to put away selfishness. In any case, this part of the discussion is way over my head. As to whether it is better to stay here or go to heaven, the question is moot. We have no choice in the matter, unless we choose to end our life. (it would be hard to state a case for God causing us to commit suicide) So, Paul was being neither, but stating a hypothetical for the sake of encouraging the saints and explaining why he would 'go on.' Deeper than that is out of my league. Question: will you tell me someday who wrote the above? Finally, what do you think about our inability to pursue the Great Commission in heaven? Doesn't this give us incentive to want to stay here and serve Jesus? Blessings in Jesus' name, charis |
||||||
584 | What do you mean? | Luke 4:33 | charis | 4721 | ||
Dear melchizedekau, Though I respect your opinion on this matter, and cannot judge your experiences, I disagree that a born-again believer in Christ Jesus can be possessed by a demon. I fully believe that a Christian can be influenced and deceived by the enemy and his fallen servants. I think that the battle rages without, not within. Nonetheless, a battle does rage around us, and we are assured that our Lord will prevail! If we just go forth trusting in that holy truth, we do not need to worry about demons 'coming into' us. I, too, have seen many things, and even witnessed 'deliverance' sessions. Though some were obvious shams, some were very sincere. However, what I have seen was clearly of an emotional, soulish nature, not a spiritual happening. I have prayed in Jesus' name for saints to be freed from deception, and seen good effect. I think this is the limit of the power of satan, and I believe he is overcome by simple faith and prayer. I think that it is not wise to give our enemy more power than he really has. It is equally unwise to underestimate the subtle power of deception. So...believe on Jesus, and don't give the devil the opportunity of ignorance or foolishness. I very much appreciate your input, and look forward to more. Blessings in Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
585 | Demon-possessed believer? | Luke 4:33 | charis | 4720 | ||
Dear WTE, No, my friend, I do not personally struggle with this question. I am with you and JVH0212 on this one. But I have seen things here that would make you shudder! (dramatic pause) Not from the 'supernatural activity of demons,' but from the gullibility of God's saints and the misleading antics of God's servants. I do believe that satan (I am joining Nolan Keck in boycotting the capitalization of our enemy's name) and his minions are still around, and have a knack for deception. Even Christians can believe these lies, and sadly, often do. But as far as indwelling or possession of the believer, I cannot find Biblical evidence. Nor have I met any reliable witnesses or supposed 'dual (or multiple!)-indwelt saints. I agree heartily with your note. Please don't apologize for length, as I know what happens when I get going :-) Blessings in Jesus' name, charis |
||||||
586 | Jesus' name baptism? | Acts 2:38 | charis | 4620 | ||
Dear JVH0212, My friend, do you realize that it has been over two months since we last discussed this issue? The horse ain't dead, yet :-) Love in Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
587 | Jesus' name baptism? | Acts 2:38 | charis | 4619 | ||
Dear JVH0212, I read with great interest the quote from Gregory A. Boyd. As I have stated on many occasions, I am not Oneness Pentecostal or Jesus-only. Nor do I have anything 'against' Jesus' command in Matthew 28. How could anyone negate His words? However, the above article is obviously a 'knee-jerk' diatribe against the opposite foolishness of the Jesus-only denial of the reality of a Tri-une God. I see both as bigoted swings of a pendulum, emotional, not spiritual. Both have sincere purpose, but sincerity does not make us right. Mr. Boyd's comment that "We are commanded to do all things "in the name of Jesus," but this obviously does not mean we have to say "in Jesus name" before we do anything (Col. 3:17)" suggests that we do not have to do anything in Jesus' name! This would fly in the face of the 18 times that Jesus said "In My name" in the Gospels! The Lord was clearly speaking of the Trinity, but also (just as clearly) speaking of the authority that the Father had granted Him. Mr. Boyd goes on to say that the Jews "placed no significance on saying these words." The name of Jesus is not just another word! I rarely get riled, but this statement is stupid. As to asking you to defend Hank Haegraaf, I wouldn't think of it :-) Just because someone has a successful ministry does not make him right on every subject. I will continue to pray in the name of Jesus, in the name of the Lord Jesus, in Jesus' name. I will also trust that He knows my heart when I follow the example of the saints in the Book of Acts and baptize new believers, praying in the name of Jesus. After all, it is a prayer, a supplication to God, not a 'formula.' (Note: once I was taught that a baptism in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit was wrong. I have repented from that position.) Blessings, dear brother, in Jesus' name, charis |
||||||
588 | Is prayer of Jabez special? | 1 Chr 4:10 | charis | 4484 | ||
Dear Joe! I agree with points 1,2,3 and 4. I must heartily disagree though, that this was a rant. A GOOD rant must have some ALL CAPS screaming. A lot more exclamation points are required!!! Yuo wood hafto mispel a bunch moor werds, two. Now that would be a RANT!!! Blessings upon you, sir or ma'am, for a great posting. Now, I know that Joe is usually a male moniker, but how can I know for sure unless you post a personal profile? Friend, give us a bit more info than Texas :-) In Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
589 | Communion, how often? | 1 Cor 11:25 | charis | 4483 | ||
Dear Joe, Thank you for your answer. I guess it's time for me to 'fess up' about my thoughts on this issue. In my church we also celebrate communion once a month. Like you, I could enjoy sharing the loaf and the cup more often than that. However, I do think that for many saints more often might breed familiarity. We exclude unbelievers for obvious reasons. The eldership of my church also agrees that having children wait until they have repented and been baptized (12-15 years old) is appropriate, giving them something to strive for and hope in, an act of faith. Guests that profess Jesus as Savior are welcome to join us. We use a real loaf of uncut bread, the pastor or elder breaks it after prayer and passes it to the congregation. Each takes a portion, then passes to the next person. When all have a piece, we go to someone, offer them to take a bit of our piece, and take a bit of theirs, eat together and bless one another in Jesus' name. Then to another saint. This sharing of the bread can take some time, even in a small church, but we are not in a rush. After the bread (no set time), we drink the wine (juice) using disposable cups. We used to share the cup literally with a large chalice (I prefer this), but hygiene became an issue of contention, so we went the 'safe' route. As others have said, we believe this is a special, holy time. After singing a hymn or chorus, we end the meeting, then have a fellowship meal together. Our desire is to follow the pattern set for us in the Bible, but we hold no 'mystical' thoughts about the elements. Though they are bread and juice, they represent exactly what the Lord said they do. The broken body of Christ made whole in the sharing of the loaf, and drinking of the shed blood of Jesus to the effect of forgiveness of sins. I have much enjoyed the various comments and expressions of faith in this line of postings. Bless you, Joe, and all of you in Jesus' name, charis |
||||||
590 | Are the Seven Deadly Sins in the Bible? | Prov 6:16 | charis | 4373 | ||
Dear Nolan, Shu ware wo aisu...Waga Shu Iesu, Ware wo aisu. (Jesus loves me, this I know, for the Bible tells me so, in Japanese) Friend, no offense taken, or even thought of. Blessings upon you in the abundance of Christ. I really do enjoy discussing such things with you, my brother. Maybe one day we can wash one another's feet! In Jesus' name, charis |
||||||
591 | Women involved? | 1 Cor 11:25 | charis | 4336 | ||
Dear Nolan, I agree with your view of servanthood. We also segregate men and women in foot-washing. In my church, we do not have footwashing very often, but it is a very moving spiritual experience when we do. I rejoice with you in your relationship with your brother (cousin) Neil. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and experience. In the Lord Jesus Christ, charis |
||||||
592 | Are the Seven Deadly Sins in the Bible? | Prov 6:16 | charis | 4322 | ||
Dear friend Nolan, Please do not think that I am dismissing anything. Usually this would mean a superior dismissing an inferior. Quite the oppposite, I find such philosophical thought beyond my humble abilities. To quote you," Now we know that there is one sin that is unforgiveable- that being blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. And God sees all of our sins in the same way and forgave them all through Christ." This is enough for me. Others may decide to dwell further into the matter. I have studied philosophy, and was saved from it when apprehended by Jesus. Right now, Francis Schaeffer is as deep as I get, and he prefers a 'simpler is better' philosophy. If you are better able to understand your battle with sin through classification and application of corresponding virtue, far be it from me to discourage you from that practice. You did ask for thoughts. Some may be deeper, some may be shallower, and some may be exactly the same as yours:-) I only pray that my own 'shallow' method would be effective to combat the sin and temptation I face. Some may be encouraged by your way, and some may find strength in mine. I pray that our combined proposition of faith, and discussion thereof, would help someone. Please do continue to post your thoughts, and bear with me when I am not in complete agreement with you. I enjoy what you write, and never think of it as 'wrong.' Peace unto you in Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
593 | Weekly Communion? | 1 Cor 11:25 | charis | 4321 | ||
Dear Bren, May it never be! No, as we are not told how often, or what exact ingredients to use, there cannot be any judgment in these things. In any case, this was not my (sly) intent. I seek encouragement and fellowship from saints besides my own church, hoping also to encourage others. The problem lies in the heart, as with most things. The heart can be affected by the manner in which something is done. Peace upon you in Jesus' name, charis |
||||||
594 | Communion, how often? | 1 Cor 11:25 | charis | 4245 | ||
Dear JonnyRay, A great answer! I agree about the exclusion of unbelievers and children. I understand not wanting to offend people, but it is ludicrous to share that which is holy with a nonbeliever. Also, wanting to 'bless' kids is one thing, but often these kids grow up with no respect for communion because of familiarity. Thank you for your reply. In Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
595 | Are there degrees of punishment in hell? | Luke 12:47 | charis | 4188 | ||
Dear Nolan Keck, Wonderful answer! I, personally, do not feel a need to distinguish between degrees of punishment in Hell, but I sense zeal and heart in your answer, and cannot but honor you in it. I would also like to say that I have read your postings, and they all convey this same zeal for the Lord Jesus. We are blessed by your participation. Blessings upon you, friend, in Jesus' name, charis |
||||||
596 | Three different heavens in the Bible? | 2 Cor 12:2 | charis | 4177 | ||
Dear prayon, Though I doubt seriously that our fellow saint is thinking along Mormon lines, I must admit that I see little practical use for dwelling on the meaning of 'thid heaven.' However, there is a 'recorded event' in Paul's life that could match this statement. "Three times I was beaten with rods, once I was stoned, three times I was shipwrecked, a night and a day I have spent in the deep." 2 Corinthians 11:25 NASB. When someone was stoned, it was to death. There was no 'partial stoning.' Therefore, Paul could be talking about an experience of going to heaven and returning to life. We are not told, so no one knows for sure, but this is a possibility. Blessings in Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
597 | OT church? | Acts 2:17 | charis | 4043 | ||
Dear Sam, Salvation, meaning the rescinding of our sentence to be sent to Hell, is definitely a have-have not situation. Saints from any age that have received a pardon from the curse of Adam are, in that sense, saved. However, I must say that I believe that there is a difference in the covenant, and more than one dispensation of salvation. "Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has not arisen anyone greater than John the Baptist; yet he who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he." Matthew 11:11 NASB This scripture speaks to me of a better dispensation of salvation in the kingdom of God. I agree that grace has been working from the very beginning. Anyone looking at stiff-necked Israel must clearly see that God has always been graceful toward His people. But theirs was a different covenant. The church of Jesus Christ was built upon the new revelation of the kingdom of God, that even Abraham was not privy. The Old Testament was for a chosen race of people, decended from one man. God allowed a few foreigners to be received into the fold, but generally did not accept Gentiles. In the New Covenant, race is not considered, neither is gender or social status. It is unique, and better than any previous promise. I am certain that Abraham, Moses and David are not ashamed of their relationship with God, and I certainly do not consider them 'second class citizens.' They are to be honored in their relationship with God. I do not see that the New Covenant negates the Old Covenant in any way. You will see my position on this in previous postings regarding Israel. The Old Testament is a 'tutor' to us, but a reality to the saints of that age. I also find it hard to think of the blood of Christ as working retroactively. When Jesus descended to tear down the gates of Hell, the saints of old received the benefit of this holy work, but I do not see their status as 'upgraded.' My friend, I do see that salvation is salvation. However, I must believe that the Christ came to usher us into a new and better age, which I prefer to call the 'Church Age.' Blessings upon you in the Lord Jesus, charis |
||||||
598 | Question Number Two? | Matt 24:44 | charis | 3532 | ||
Dear JonnyRay49423, Your confession is received and applauded loudly! Oh, I believe there are several hints about the end time. But, as the above scripture says, Jesus will not come when you think He will, and in another scripture "Therefore be on the alert, for you do not know which day your Lord is coming." Matt 24:42 NASB. So, as you said earlier, we must be prepared today. No eschatology or hypothesis should affect that stance in nay way. Blessings to you in Jesus' name, charis |
||||||
599 | Women speak in church? | 1 Cor 14:34 | charis | 3498 | ||
Dear inHzsvc, I acquiesce to your point that that Bible only states one side of this issue. Your thinking, your method is to adhere to the words of Paul as though they were intended to all, for all time. My thinking, my method is to believe that Paul was addressing a specific situation, and that the gist, the essence(life) of his teaching is to be adhered to. You have admitted that the word is silent concerning the 'other side' of this issue. I do, however, believe that we agree on the premise that women are different, and should be under authority. Children, too. I believe the same result can be attained without the 'gag,' without the hat and the veil. I am sure that the Bible teaches us that love is the preferred method, as taught in this same letter, by the same Author, to the same church. Apparently, this love command was not yet effective, for reasons we do not completely know. I hope and pray that the better teaching is being restored to the church, as we come closer to Jesus' soon return. I am aware of the dangers of 'Babylon' today, but also aware that rigid, stiff-necked Israel did not please God. Jesus' teaching always surprised the extremists with the balance of love and truth. Thank you for your patience with me. In Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
600 | Women speak in church? | 1 Cor 14:34 | charis | 3489 | ||
Dear Joel, Amen! If men would manifest their faith and live up to their roles as prescribed in the Bible (husband, father, leader, pillar), we would not need 'laws' to protect their authority. I believe that this is more what Paul was teaching than a new version of the 'Law.' Jesus' commandments are much more powerful and effective than the Law ever was. Blessings in Christ Jesus, charis |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ] Next > Last [37] >> |