Results 41 - 60 of 255
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: Jensen Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
41 | Salmon | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 19757 | ||
Dear Steve...Welcome to the Forum :) 1 Kings 3:15 is where you should look. God Bless...Jensen |
||||||
42 | Salmon | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 19761 | ||
Wait a minute Steve. I may have misunderstood your question. I have given you the passage where Solomon is going to split a single child in half to discover the real mother. The only thing I find on Salmon is where He is listed in the various geneologies. Nothing about Salmon and two babies. But my resources are not as good as some others here on the Forum so they may have something to add. God Bless...Jensen |
||||||
43 | What about those who have never heard? | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 19798 | ||
And then there is mercy.....the discretionary power of a Judge to pardon; the compassionate or kindly forbearance shown toward an offender. We do have a merciful God after all and, just as a possible example, mercy may be shown to a very young child or infant after their death. God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
44 | Salmon | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 19889 | ||
Here are the verses that contain "Salmon"; There does not seem to be any reference to two babies. At least directly. They all seem to be geneologies. There may be a secondary connection perhaps thru the mother or the father but I have not studied further. RU 4:20 Amminadab the father of Nahshon, Nahshon the father of Salmon, RU 4:21 Salmon the father of Boaz, Boaz the father of Obed, 1 Ch 2:11 Nahshon was the father of Salmon, Salmon the father of Boaz, 12 Boaz the father of Obed and Obed the father of Jesse. MT 1:4 Ram the father of Amminadab, Amminadab the father of Nahshon, Nahshon the father of Salmon, MT 1:5 Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab, Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth, LK 32 the son of Jesse, the son of Obed, the son of Boaz, the son of Salmon, the son of Nahshon, Obed the father of Jesse, God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
45 | Salmon | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 19890 | ||
Dear norrie...This note was sent to Steve but will not be of much help because I do not know what verses will lead Steve to the answer to his question. Hope you can help :-)......Jensen Here are the verses that contain "Salmon"; There does not seem to be any reference to two babies. At least directly. They all seem to be geneologies. There may be a secondary connection perhaps thru the mother or the father but I have not studied further. RU 4:20 Amminadab the father of Nahshon, Nahshon the father of Salmon, RU 4:21 Salmon the father of Boaz, Boaz the father of Obed, 1 Ch 2:11 Nahshon was the father of Salmon, Salmon the father of Boaz, 12 Boaz the father of Obed and Obed the father of Jesse. MT 1:4 Ram the father of Amminadab, Amminadab the father of Nahshon, Nahshon the father of Salmon, MT 1:5 Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab, Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth, LK 32 the son of Jesse, the son of Obed, the son of Boaz, the son of Salmon, the son of Nahshon, Obed the father of Jesse, God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
46 | lent..biblical or doctrinal? | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 19893 | ||
Lent is one of the Liturgical Seasons. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC). "1168 Beginning with the Easter Triduum as its source of light, the new age of the Resurrection fills the whole liturgical year..." Scriptual support LK 4:19 "to proclaim the year of the Lord's favor." Which is from, ISA 61:2 "to proclaim the year of the LORD's favor and the day of vengeance of our God, to comfort all who mourn," The liturgy of any particular period of time depends on the circumstances. That is, either leading to, or following Easter. "...celebrating this annual cycle of the mysteries of Christ,..." as the CCC puts it. So here it is. LENT, which is this period of time leading to the Risen Christ Jesus is biblical. It is based on Scripture. It is also a church doctrine. The Catholic Church, among others, observe it. God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
47 | I NEED A SERMON FOR "LOVE" | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 19899 | ||
More Love Scripture...Song of Songs Depending on your congregation, this Book has all kinds of possibilities. Read it over with "youth" in mind and be led. Or read it over with "seniors" in mind and be led. Or husbands and wives, and then you may want to put a little in there for each in a mixed age group. God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
48 | Salmon | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 20513 | ||
Dear Norrie..On 10/21/01 at 9:11 pm You wrote... "Salmon was the husband of Rahab and the father of Boaz. Soloman was the one w/the 2 babies." Please provide the Scripture proof for your statement or say that there is none that you know of. Let us clear this up for Steve in Denmark. God Bless...Jensen |
||||||
49 | Salmon | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 20523 | ||
PersonalNote...Norrie............... Thanks, I hope Steve reads your post. God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
50 | apostle that was with out god?? | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 20577 | ||
Dear Ruth30..Welcome to the Forum:-) You wrote, "which apostle did jesus say was an israekite without god???", but the word "israekite" is not found in the Bible. Second, are you certain that Jesus was speaking of an Apostle being "with out god"? If you will provide a little better information the Forum will be better able to answer your question. God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
51 | Beast system, what do you think it is? | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 21211 | ||
Dear Casiv...Please tell us your view first, and then tell us why you will not listen to dissenting opinions. God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
52 | unaffordable annulllment-How to? | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 21949 | ||
Dear Anglo38-LL...There are scripture verses that cover most, if not all, areas of our lives. We can disagree on those ares where the Bible is not exhaustive. For example EX 20:13 "You shall not murder." is pretty clear. Most orthodox Christians would agree that there are clear directives, or guidelines, for when a marriage may be discharged by means of a divorce. Those reasons are given by Jesus in MT 5:31 "It has been said, "Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce." 32 But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery." Since the term "divorce" is commonly understood today to be a legal term, the word annulement may be better suited and substituted in the verse above because Jesus was addressing the things that are God's and not the things that are Cesar's. This is also the position of the Roman church. If two people were married in the sight of God, in His church, there are issues they must consider that bear directly on their walk with the Lord. I understand that a person may go through a "church wedding" and not yet be saved. I was one of the many who did just that. But I believe today, since being saved, that God did indeed here our prayers and the prayers of others on that day, that my marriage be blessed by Him. To better help answer the question perhaps you would consider providing more details. What, exactly, is it that you can not afford? Are you speaking of financial issues or issues relating to the person's relationship with God. The time elapsed since a legal divorce may be irrelevant since we are studying the Bible for answers. However there is an issue of estrangement. The Bible will answer "what should they do?" and this Forum may help with the answer if provided a little more detail. God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
53 | are there innocent victims in the bible | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 21957 | ||
Dear Jordan...Sin is responsible for all death and destruction. Sin is the reason that innocent people had to die. Sin is why bad things happen to good people. Except for the work of the Cross, none of us are innocent. Here are a couple of Biblical characters that considered themselves innocent in both the legal and the moral sense. MT 27:24 When Pilate saw that he was getting nowhere, but that instead an uproar was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd. "I am innocent of this man's blood," he said. "It is your responsibility!" JER 26:12 Then Jeremiah said to all the officials and all the people: "The LORD sent me to prophesy against this house and this city all the things you have heard. 13 Now reform your ways and your actions and obey the LORD your God. Then the LORD will relent and not bring the disaster he has pronounced against you. 14 As for me, I am in your hands; do with me whatever you think is good and right. 15 Be assured, however, that if you put me to death, you will bring the guilt of innocent blood on yourselves and on this city and on those who live in it, for in truth the LORD has sent me to you to speak all these words in your hearing." God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
54 | unaffordable annulllment-How to? | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 22611 | ||
Dear Tim...Your answer sounds like an answer "from a Catholic"....or Ex-Catholic :-) Please do not be a stumbling block. You may rationalize all you want but the Bible is clear. If you were not a Christian when you were married then it should not matter, what matters is if you were a Christian when married and went against the words of Jesus to receive a divorce. If free consent is lacking a marriage may be declared null and void. The remarriage of persons divorced from a living, lawful spouse controvenes the plan and the law of God as taught by Christ. There is no gray area here. It is very Biblical and should be taken very seriously. The Catholic Church did not put words in the mouth of Jesus. It is sad that many Protestant Churches do. Irreconcilabe differences indeed! None the less, Christians who divorce are not seperated from His church and should/must still live a Christian life. If you were married in the presence of God, in His church, you are obligated to keep His commands as surly as those in Exodus 20. If you have to choose between what some Christians say about divorce and what Jesus said Himself, then you put your faith in the wrong position. There simply is no choice. Like it or not. :-) God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
55 | unaffordable annulllment-How to? | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 22809 | ||
Dear Tim...I agree with most of what you wrote... You wrote... "There is an alternative translation which goes like this ......She does not become GUILTY of adultery but the INNOCENT PARTY of adultery if you will." ....but that is the way I understood the passage so that I'm not sure of what you mean by "alternative translation", unless you meant the word(s) themselves. But I understand that divorce under those circumstances was devastating for women. But the more important devestation was a sin against the law. Nothing has changed, except that the social status, the secondary devestation if you will, has lessened for women in Post-Christian America. But the sin is still paramount. You wrote... "Do we forbid him from re-marrying? I know preachers who would indeed do this but on what scriptural authority I do not know." ....but you gave the Sciptural authority above (Mt 5:32) so I mis-understand your point. But it may be related to an annulement which, as you know, is a judicial pronouncement declaring a marriage invalid. The "judge" is the church. The church relys on Scripture, not on the ever changing socio-economic status of believers. Divorce should be difficult. Half of the people in our churches have been divorced, the same percentage as the general population of unbelievers. How then are we to be different from the population of non-believers if not to make the desolution of a marriage vow Scriptural? We can't go by popular acceptance of the fact. My mom would always ask me "Would you jump off a bridge just because everyone else did" to illustrate how we must sometimes act independent of the herd. As Christians must act. Please do not think I judge divorce to be beyond the pale. I, like you, think that divorce should not happen in a Bible believing Christian home. But when it does, it should be by an annulument of His church, not our secular courts, which is of secondary importance. On this issue, the Roman Church has it right :-) God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
56 | When did the catholic church go wrong? | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 25873 | ||
The Roman Catholic Church teaches that Peter was the first Pope. Therefore the first error was by the first Pope. Paul opposed Peter on doctrine. Paul was correct, the Pope was in error. GAL 2:11 When Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong. 12 Before certain men came from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles. But when they arrived, he began to draw back and separate himself from the Gentiles because he was afraid of those who belonged to the circumcision group. 13 The other Jews joined him in his hypocrisy, so that by their hypocrisy even Barnabas was led astray. Technically, this was where the Catholic Church made the first error. But it was corrected. Let us pray that the other errors will be corrected soon. By His Grace.....Jensen |
||||||
57 | When did the catholic church go wrong? | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 26070 | ||
Dear Emmaus.........With all due respect indeed.....but the doctrine is Galatians 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." If the first Pope taught through his actions that there was indeed a difference between Jew and Greek, that would be doctrinal. The doctrine of the seperation of Jew from everyone else. Would it not? God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
58 | How did Nephilims come into existance? | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 26074 | ||
Dear wjohn......You may have heard of two sub-Saharan tribes. The Pygmies and the Watusies. The former averaging less than 5 feet in height while the latter averaging well over 6 feet tall. The Nephilim were a genetic sub-group just like all sub-groups since we all came through Adam, then Noah. God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
59 | How did Nephilims come into existance? | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 26962 | ||
Dear Thomas....You wrote..."I believe this scripture leads me to believe that Satans fallen angels had relations with mortal women"...While you may believe that this scripture leads you to believe...Nonetheless, there is no such proof. Furthermore, you may be watching too much TBN :-)This is the kind of carp they spread. God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
60 | Knowledge of the Second Coming | Bible general Archive 1 | Jensen | 27064 | ||
Dear Jesusman...The Son is not the Father. The Son prays to the Father...The Father is pleased with the Son...The Father sends the Holy Spirit....There is a subject/object relationship..... Furtehmore.... John 14:7 "If you really knew me, you would know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him." Your question reminds me of the logician who declares that God is not omnipotent because He can not sin. God Bless....Jensen |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [13] >> |