Results 41 - 60 of 210
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: Glory Bound Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
41 | Question for Glory Bound | Bible general Archive 2 | Glory Bound | 134435 | ||
mommapbs, Surely you can see what I have stated!!! GB |
||||||
42 | Question for Glory Bound | Bible general Archive 2 | Glory Bound | 134509 | ||
So Ed, I expect you and the rest of those who refuse to see and understand what it is I have been stating, would recommend that we simply discard our bibles. For those who cannot reconise what I have been stating, I will put it as plain as it can be put. NO ONE has the originally inspired scriptures. You know this as well as I. But you can't tell me that our Lord did not consider this fact concerning His word, or that He has not inspired some of the translators of “some” versions; OR that the enemy has not taken this opportunity to dilute the Living Word. If those folks who insist on arguing with me concerning this matter, understood the word "faith," perhaps they could understand what I have been saying. Or is it that they simply enjoy quarreling. From the way the wolves seem to have come out of their corners to attack me concerning this matter, I strongly suspect the latter. The attitudes of those responding thus far concerning this topic perplexes me, for I had thought very highly of many who insist on attacking my stance on this matter. Why the attacks? Because one of their own, who cannot accept rebuke, chose to go on the offensive concerning a matter that can only be contrary to the very essence of scripture. If they cannot understand what it is I am saying concerning the inspiration of “some” versions of scripture, I would attest that perhaps, though they are into scripture, scripture has yet to get into them. Perhaps this is due to the fact that, when it comes right down to the bottom line, they do not trust the very words they profess. They have no foundation. Considering the stance they have taken against my profession, what other conclusion am I to assume? As yet, there is at least one more person in this forum whom I have grown to love and respect, who has not added to the conversation. When he does, if his attitude concerning the matter is the same as the many thus far, I will wipe the dust of this forum off my feet. Hopefully though, there is at least one herein who does more than just profess and will perhaps prove it with his comments, should he decide to lower himself to the level of participating. Your brother in Christ. GB |
||||||
43 | Question for Glory Bound | Bible general Archive 2 | Glory Bound | 134514 | ||
HANK. I HAVE BEGGED YOU NOT TO DRAW ME INTO SUCH A GODLESS DISCUSSION AS WHAT YOU HAVE TURNED THIS MATTER INTO. If you wish to go against what it is you profess, this is between you and our Lord. As for me, you can take your senseless insistence on quarreling the matter, and thus disgracing our Lord, up with the mirror, or perhaps a telephone pole, for it appears that there would be little difference. Insult me as you wish. I forgive you. I also pray your eyes will be opened before you soil the word more than you now insist on doing. Tell everyone there is no inspired bible as you wish. It is you who will have to answer for your ignorance. Not I. The blood of those you turn aside will be on your head. Not mine. . May God Bless and have mercy on you, Hank. Evil as you are portraying yourself to me, I know there is something there worth loving. And I do love you, and all who would be mislead and turned aside from scripture due to your hardheaded insistence. As to the proof you insist on Hank. I expect Christ felt just as sad performing His miracles and speaking the truth to those who refused to see and hear, as I am, concerning your senseless refusal to see, your insistence on continuing the argument, and refusal to accept my answer for the truth it is. I cannot make you see Hank. I cannot open your eyes. I can only make you aware. GB |
||||||
44 | Satan said I will how many times? | Bible general Archive 2 | Glory Bound | 134520 | ||
You want scripture Brad? Consider 2Ti 2:16 and 2Ti 3:7. This seems to depict those who continue to insist on arguing this point. But then, why should I quote scripture those who do not believe in its inspiration? I make no claim of wisdom. I judge not. But by the authority of the Living Word of God All Mighty, I know what is and is not of Him. He has given me His word, just as He has you. If this gives me an “appearance of superiority,” so be it. Those who consider themselves inferior only see another as superior. I profess only what is mine by the authority of the Living Word, the authority of which seems to be in question in this particular thread, If those who profess to know scripture cannot understand the truth of my “rather glowing generalities”, perhaps they should take a closer look at their attempt to live what it is they profess to know. Through faith, discernment and the Holy Spirit, I choose to accept the inspiration of some translations. By this same “faith, discernment and Holy Spirit, I choose not to accept the lack of inspiration of other translations.” I neither need, nor do I attempt to provide the “proof,” which those of little faith insist on. Those who call themselves Christians, yet insist on “proof” concerning my avocation, that particular versions are inspired, might be asked, “by what authority do you know what it is that you profess?” Truth is the Word. If one doubts the authority of the word, what does this say concerning his truth? GB |
||||||
45 | Satan said I will how many times? | Bible general Archive 2 | Glory Bound | 134521 | ||
My conversations with you are ended Hank. You can have the last word. Rant and Rave on... GB |
||||||
46 | Satan said I will how many times? | Bible general Archive 2 | Glory Bound | 134531 | ||
Well Ed. Would you not recommend that, considering the many uninspired versions, a new convert tread carefully. I simply make my statements, which you quote based on my personal experience, research and discernment. Do I not have this right without enraging the ravening wolves? Does the word "inspired" eliminate what a particular individual might consider "less than perfect?" i.e. There is at least one occurrence in the King James in which the word "son" is used. In having studied that particular passage, and considering the meaning of the Greek word, I personally feel that the word "children" would be more appropriate. This is not what I consider an error, for literally, the word could have been translated either way. Ed, I asked not to be dragged into this discussion from the very beginning of the thread. I am growing very weary concerning this matter. I doubt the sincerity of those who insist on continuing. I fail to see a true motive, other than resentment. I apologize if I portray myself as something, which offends so many herein. It is by the authority of the very scripture, which my opponents question, that I stand by what I have stated. Thus I make no apologies for the essence of my statements. Please forgive me when I do not answer questions, which are superfluous, redundant and, or have already been answered. This is my last correspondence with you concerning this matter, Ed. You too can continue to rant and rave without rebuttal, if it is in your nature as well. GB |
||||||
47 | Satan said I will how many times? | Bible general Archive 2 | Glory Bound | 134534 | ||
Hi Searcher Though it appears that most seem to think I am saying this, No, I am not saying this. I have not said this. I cannot understand why these folks are so enraged by what it is that I have said. Please tell me where the NIV and KJV, in your opinion "disagree." GB |
||||||
48 | Satan said I will how many times? | Bible general Archive 2 | Glory Bound | 134537 | ||
Considering what I have stated in my profile, this is the wrong place for your post. I refuse to believe that anyone is daft enough to even imply that I have said anything of the sort, in this thread or elsewhere. But then, considering some of the other assertions, implications and accusations, I am not surprised. GB |
||||||
49 | Question for Glory Bound | Bible general Archive 2 | Glory Bound | 134540 | ||
Ed I am who I am. Neither now, nor have I ever claimed to be anyone other. I wonder though, are there not many herein depicted in your note? Do you consider me a criminal because I defend what I have learned in scripture, or because you disagree with how, or what I advocate? Are you so offended by one who rocks your boat that you would consider me one whom you apparently hated in times past? When have I "called another honored member of this forum a non Christian?" As I suspected, you rally to the support of your friend, rather than admit that he may have been wrong. I rebuked this person when he was in the wrong. He then chose to take offense, and proceeded to attack my very next post in every sort available. I begged this person not to drag me into such a godless conversation. He refused, and was then joined by others such as yourself. He then chose to nit pick my profile. You did the same. If this is what you consider "how a Christian is to act," then I can only pray for you and your friends. I will not, however continue to allow them to drag me into their Godless splutter. I come to this forum to learn, and hopefully to share my gift. It is apparent that there are those herein who profess, yet have no desire to adhere to scripture. So be it. This is there decision. I cannot, nor do I intend to attempt to change them. I only ask for the same respect, which has been refused me thus far. GB |
||||||
50 | Satan said I will how many times? | Bible general Archive 2 | Glory Bound | 134549 | ||
Dear Brother. I will be the first to admit that I need some help. It is those who refuse to admit this, whom are most at risk. Gb |
||||||
51 | Did God create evil? | Gen 1:31 | Glory Bound | 133916 | ||
God created man. Rather than following Gods one simple rule,(not to eat of the forbidden fruit,) man chose to disobey. Thus the evil of Satan took root. It has flourished ever since. In the beginning, man knew no evil. Through disobediance, his eyes were opened. Through hard headedness, many still choose to follow their own "free will," thinking that they are smarter than God. There is good news and bad news. The good news is that God saw that man was incapiable of maintaining an obediant nature. He sent His Son to pay the price for mans disobediance. "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. Romans 6:23 and John 3:15 The above is the good news. It is also the bad news. For, what are the wages of sin? And what is it that one must do that they should not perish? It is bad news to those who do not believe, for if they do not accept the gift of Gods Son, then they themselves must pay that debt... GB |
||||||
52 | who are the sons of God? | Gen 6:2 | Glory Bound | 130798 | ||
You will hear many profess through utter ignorance that angels are the "sons of God", yet I put you in mind that Jesus Christ is the one and only begotten Son of God. Plain and simple: John 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: ôå'êíïí teknon tek'-non From the base of G5098; a child (as produced): - child, daughter, son. This is one of the flaws of interpretation in the KJ. The word which was translated "sons" should have been translated "children." All who accept Jesus as savior are "sons" (CHILDREN) of God. GB |
||||||
53 | who are the sons of God? | Gen 6:2 | Glory Bound | 130799 | ||
You will hear many profess through utter ignorance that angels are the "sons of God", yet I put you in mind that Jesus Christ is the one and only begotten Son of God. Plain and simple: John 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: ôå'êíïí teknon tek'-non From the base of G5098; a child (as produced): - child, daughter, son. This is one of the flaws of interpretation in the KJ. The word which was translated "sons" should have been translated "children." All who accept Jesus as savior are "sons" (CHILDREN) of God. GB |
||||||
54 | who are the sons of God? | Gen 6:2 | Glory Bound | 130819 | ||
I have checked my Bible. It says what I stated. Rev. 20:7 makes no reference to, as you put it, "Gods sons." You may wish to read it again if you are referring to Satan as a son of God. As to your reference to Job 1:6, I will quote Matthew Henry. Satan among the sons of God (Job_1:6), an adversary (so Satan signifies) to God, to men, to all good: he thrust himself into an assembly of the sons of God that came to present themselves before the Lord. This means either, 1. A meeting of the saints on earth. Professors of religion, in the patriarchal age, were called sons of God (Gen_6:2); they had then religious assemblies and stated times for them. The King came in to see his guests; the eye of God was on all present. But there was a serpent in paradise, a Satan among the sons of God; when they come together he is among them, to distract and disturb them, stands at their right hand to resist them. The Lord rebuke thee, Satan! Or, 2. A meeting of the angels in heaven. They are the sons of God, Job_38:7. They came to give an account of their negotiations on earth and to receive new instructions. Satan was one of them originally; but how hast thou fallen, O Lucifer! He shall no more stand in that congregation, yet he is here represented, as coming among them, either summoned to appear as a criminal or connived at, for the present, though an intruder. I am sure you are sincere in your belief, but God said it and I believe it! JESUS CHRIST IS THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON OF GOD. Joh 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. only begotten: G3439 monogenees mon-og-en-ace From G3441 and G1096; only born, that is, sole: - only (begotten, child). You can twist it any way you wish. No doubt you will fool many. But you may want to consider Mat 18:6, “but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to stumble, it would be better for him that a huge millstone should be hung around his neck, and that he should be sunk in the depths of the sea.” Along with this, consider the fact that those who wish to teach the Word will be held to a higher standard. GB |
||||||
55 | who are the sons of God? | Gen 6:2 | Glory Bound | 130822 | ||
Forgive me if my post was abrasive. I stand firm on the word. As I read them, your thoughts were not scriptural. GB |
||||||
56 | homosexuality | Lev 18:22 | Glory Bound | 130462 | ||
God loves us all, no matter who or what we are. It is the sin, and non acceptance which is non acceptable in His eyes. A homosexual, which is commonly referred to in scripture as a Sodomite. Do a word search in the King James version and see what is stated concerning such. For one thing, they sin against their own flesh. For another thing, our creator looks on that particular sin as an abomination. Pretty strong words. Well, it's a ugly thing if one gets down to the nitty gritty! In OT times, sodomy was punishable by death. The offender never had an opportunity to repent. What Jesus did concerning this fact was to give the offender a path of forgiveness (himself,) and time for repentance. Those who justify, uphold and make excuses for the homo's (sodomites) fool no one other than themselves and the scripturally unlearned, thus making them, as themselves spiritually void, and headed for eternal damnation. We have not the right to judge another, for this is left to Jesus Christ alone. Yet He gave us His word so we could judge the actions. He expects to do just that. Though at the moment one may be directly headed for Hades, we know not what will be the ultimate direction that person will take. Meanwhile we must.... gently instruct, in the hope that God will grant them repentance leading them to a knowledge of the truth, and that they will come to their senses and escape from the trap of the devil, who has taken them captive to do his will. GB |
||||||
57 | homosexuality | Lev 18:22 | Glory Bound | 130463 | ||
Correction: It is the sin, and non acceptance of the Son and the price He paid which is non acceptable in in the sight of God. |
||||||
58 | Tattoos? | Lev 19:28 | Glory Bound | 130681 | ||
Lev 19:28 Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD. "for the dead":lamenting the dead. If one should not do such if grief, why should they "not do it" for whatever reason? GB |
||||||
59 | Is God a racist? | Deut 17:15 | Glory Bound | 130053 | ||
Your question is best answered dirrectly from scripture. Rom 10:11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. Rom 10:12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. Read the book of Galations. Then reread it. then read it again. As I once pondered this question and finally had my eyes opened, so will you. GB |
||||||
60 | Why did David use five stones? | 1 Sam 17:40 | Glory Bound | 129388 | ||
I believe your answer is best stated by Matthew Henry. But what arms and ammunition is David furnished with? Truly none but what he brought with him as a shepherd; no breastplate, nor corselet, but his plain shepherd's coat; no spear, but his staff; no sword nor bow, but his sling; no quiver, but his scrip; nor any arrows, but, instead of them, five smooth stones picked up out of the brook, 1Sa_17:40. By this it appeared that "his confidence was purely in the power of God," and not in any sufficiency of his own, and that now at length he who put it into his heart to fight the Philistine put it into his head with what weapons to do it. I would say that David chose five stones because he thought "he" might miss. It only took one, because he was was doing Gods will. Perhaps as we often do, even David doubted his own strength in faith. GB |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [11] >> |