Results 341 - 360 of 1618
|
||||||
Results from: Answers On or After: Thu 12/31/70 Author: BradK Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
341 | Scripture about rapture | 1 Thess 4:17 | BradK | 221281 | ||
Hello puppytoes, Though not stated in terms of a "promise of the rapture", reference can be found in 1 Thess. 4:16-17- 1 Thess 4:16 "For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first". 1 Thess 4:17 "Then we who are alive and remain will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord". (NASB) I hope this helps, BradK |
||||||
342 | is it possible for Jesus to have sinned? | Heb 4:15 | BradK | 221184 | ||
Hello Arlene, You ask a great question. This touches upon what is referred to as "impeccability". Heb 4:15 tells us- "For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted in all things as we are, yet without sin." (NASB) I would hold that it was not possible for Christ to have sinned! He was 'tempted', but without sin. As the Moody Handbook of Theology notes, "Those who hold to impeccability suggest Christ’s temptation by Satan was genuine, but it was impossible for Christ to sin. Several introductory observations should be noted. Observations: The purpose of the temptation was not to see if Christ could sin, but to show that He could not sin. The temptation came at a critical time: the beginning of Christ’s public ministry. The temptation was designed to show the nation what a unique Savior she had: the impeccable Son of God. It is also noteworthy that it was not Satan who initiated the temptation but the Holy Spirit (Matt. 4:1). If Christ could have sinned, then the Holy Spirit solicited Christ to sin, but that is something God does not do (James 1:13). Christ’s peccability could relate only to His human nature; His divine nature was impeccable. Although Christ had two natures, He was nonetheless one Person and could not divorce Himself of His deity. Wherever He went, the divine nature was present. If the two natures could be separated then it could be said that He could sin in His humanity, but because the human and divine natures cannot be separated from the Person of Christ, and since the divine nature cannot sin, it must be affirmed that Christ could not have sinned. Evidence. The evidence for the impeccability of Christ is set forth by William Shedd and others in the following way. (1) The immutability of Christ (Heb. 13:8). Christ is unchangeable and therefore could not sin. If Christ could have sinned while on earth, then He could sin now because of His immutability. If He could have sinned on earth, what assurance is there that He will not sin now? (2) The omnipotence of Christ (Matt. 28:18). Christ was omnipotent and therefore could not sin. Weakness is implied where sin is possible, yet there was no weakness of any kind in Christ. How could He be omnipotent and still be able to sin? (3) The omniscience of Christ (John 2:25). Christ was omniscient and therefore could not sin. Sin depends on ignorance in order that the sinner may be deceived, but Christ could not be deceived because He knows all things, including the hypothetical (Matt. 11:21). If Christ could have sinned then He really did not know what would happen if He would sin. (4) The deity of Christ. Christ is not only man but also God. If He were only a man then He could have sinned, but God cannot sin and in a union of the two natures, the human nature submits to the divine nature (otherwise the finite is stronger than the infinite). United in the one Person of Christ are the two natures, humanity and deity; because Christ is also deity He could not sin. (5) The nature of temptation (James 1:14–15). The temptation that came to Christ was from without. However, for sin to take place, there must be an inner response to the outward temptation. Since Jesus did not possess a sin nature, there was nothing within Him to respond to the temptation. People sin because there is an inner response to the outer temptation. (6) The will of Christ. In moral decisions, Christ could have only one will: to do the will of His Father; in moral decisions the human will was subservient to the divine will. If Christ could have sinned then His human will would have been stronger than the divine will. (7) The authority of Christ (John 10:18). In His deity, Christ had complete authority over His humanity. For example, no one could take the life of Christ except He would lay it down willingly (John 10:18). If Christ had authority over life and death, He certainly had authority over sin; if He could withhold death at will, He could also withhold sin at will." [Paul P. Enns, The Moody Handbook of Theology] I hope this helps, BradK |
||||||
343 | WHO BESIDE METHUSELAH WENT DIRECTLY TO H | Gen 5:27 | BradK | 221136 | ||
Hello Lydia, Gen. 5:27 tells us, "...all the days of Methuselah were 969 years, and he died". I believe you're referring to Enoch and Elijah, both of whom were translated- not seeing death. Gen 5:24 "Enoch walked with God; and he was not, for God took him". (NASB) 2 Kings 2:11 "As they were going along and talking, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire and horses of fire which separated the two of them. And Elijah went up by a whirlwind to heaven." (NASB) These are the only two that scripture indicates never saw death. BradK |
||||||
344 | prodigal son person or Israel | Luke 15:12 | BradK | 221050 | ||
Hello watchman, Welcome to the Forum. Have you considered that the answer may be in the fact that all commentaries relate this to a person? The obvious questions are: Why do you find it is Israel? and; What leads you to this conclusion? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
345 | contraception | Rom 14:1 | BradK | 221037 | ||
Hello Rajeeb, The Bible doesn't specifically address contraception. Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
346 | free interpretation | Gen 2:2 | BradK | 220970 | ||
Hello Rick, Might I then ask: did you understand all that you read and are you in agreement with the Terms of Use and About Forum? About Postings says: Postings must be Biblically based and not opposing the Bible's sole authority (sola Scriptura), Christianity, or the deity of Jesus Christ. Whenever possible, postings should include supporting Bible references. To adhere to StudyBibleForum's intended purpose, please read the following before submitting a post: 1. This post is biblically based and whenever possible, I have included Bible references to support it. 2. This post is not intended as a personal attack on the authority of the Bible or on other users of this forum. 3. This post is not submitted as an effort to foster divisiveness, ill-will, dissension or other disruptions to this forum. 4. I have carefully proofread my post and believe it represents my best efforts. If I'm understanding you correctly, your understanding of "free interpretation" is at odds with the Lockmans' TOU and About Postings! Postings must be biblically based, not our own interpretations, opinions, beliefs, etc. Do you understand and/or hold to sola scriptura? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
347 | free vs formal | Gen 2:2 | BradK | 220967 | ||
Rick, I'd recommend you start by reading the Lockman Foundations' Doctrinal Statement and About Postings. This should clear things up. If not,there is a Yellow-outlined warning at the top of the SBF Home Page which reads: IMPORTANT: DO NOT POST TO THIS FORUM until you familiarize yourself thoroughly with its guidelines. Click on "About the Forum" and read the instructions contained therein, including the section "Terms of Use." Be very sure that you understand and agree to comply with these guidelines. Failure to do so may result in revocation of your privilege to post. Being familiar with the Forum, it's guidelines and protocol saves much frustration. Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
348 | Remember... | Gen 2:2 | BradK | 220966 | ||
Hello Rick, As my 9th-Grade teacher was fond of saying, "tell me something I don't already know". You're appearing to be one to quote things out of context and are simply side-stepping the issue by failing to give adequate scriptural support to any of your "views" Possibly you have not read nor are familiar with About Forum and Terms of Use. Please take the time to do so if you haven't. It will be of benefit to all of us. Our gracious host, the Lockman Foundation in their doctrinal statement holds: We believe that the entire Bible is the inspired and inerrant word of God; the only infallible rule of faith and practice. In About Postings: Postings must be Biblically based and not opposing the Bible's sole authority (sola Scriptura), Christianity, or the deity of Jesus Christ. Whenever possible, postings should include supporting Bible references. Rick you're welcome to your views, beliefs, etc. However, when they fall outside Orthodoxy or show ignorance of the appropriate protocol here on the SBF, it leads to uneccessary strife! Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
349 | Interpretation | Gen 2:2 | BradK | 220935 | ||
Hello Rick, I don't believe Keliy was throwing the bible out- quite the opposite! The Word of God clearly states in 2 Pet 1:20, "But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation," (NASB) You state, "I believe we are all to interpret the Word of God, but it will be up to God Alone to judge our interpretations and our lives lived based on those interpretations." Where exactly in scripture do we find this teaching? It appears that you're offering a defense of subjective interpretation? Scripture is not open to any and every whim. The Historic Christian Faith supports no such notion! Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
350 | how and where did paul die | 2 Tim 1:17 | BradK | 220900 | ||
Hello rtwaco, FOX's Book of Martyr's tells us: "Paul, the apostle, who before was called Saul, after his great travail and unspeakable labors in promoting the Gospel of Christ, suffered also in this first persecution under Nero. Abdias, declareth that under his execution Nero sent two of his esquires, Ferega and Parthemius, to bring him word of his death. They, coming to Paul instructing the people, desired him to pray for them, that they might believe; who told them that shortly after they should believe and be baptised at His sepulcher. This done, the soldiers came and led him out of the city to the place of execution, where he, after his prayers made, gave his neck to the sword." I hope this helps, BradK |
||||||
351 | Is looking at porn a sin if ur single? | James 4:17 | BradK | 220883 | ||
Hello bobtanner..., I would recommend first asking yourself, "would God be pleased with me looking at porn?". The Apostle John warns us in 1 John 2:16, " For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the boastful pride of life, is not from the Father, but is from the world." Here are a couple additional scriptures to consider: James 4:17 "Therefore, to one who knows the right thing to do and does not do it, to him it is sin." (NASB) Phil 4:8 "Finally, brethren, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything worthy of praise, dwell on these things." (NASB) Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
352 | Three names given to the Holy Spirit in | 2 Tim 2:15 | BradK | 220875 | ||
Cugu, Have you read the passage? BradK |
||||||
353 | Did the stone or the Sword kill Goliath | 1 Sam 17:49 | BradK | 220853 | ||
Hello jrpow24, It's generally accepted from scripture that David killed Goliath from the stone in his sling- 1 Sam. 17:49-50 "And David put his hand into his bag and took from it a stone and slung it, and struck the Philistine on his forehead. And the stone sank into his forehead, so that he fell on his face to the ground. Thus David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and a stone, and he struck the Philistine and killed him; but there was no sword in David's hand." (NASB) The Commentary Critical notes, "51. cut off his head--not as an evidence of the giant's death, for his slaughter had been effected in presence of the whole army, but as a trophy to be borne to Saul. The heads of slain enemies are always regarded in the East as the most welcome tokens of victory." I hope this helps, BradK |
||||||
354 | removed scripture | 2 Tim 2:15 | BradK | 220851 | ||
Hello mamametal, Can you tell me which Bibles use only a dash (sic)?? There are slight diffences in translation among the more reliable versions, such as NASB, NKJV, ESV, etc. However, I'm not convinced any of these are "leaving out words"! Can you be a little more specific as to your concern and to what brings it about? Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
355 | one iota | Rev 22:18 | BradK | 220849 | ||
Hello Mamametal, I believe you're thinking of Revelation 18- Rev 22:18 "I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book;" Rev 22:19 "and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book." (NASB) I hope this helps, BradK |
||||||
356 | John 4:9-10 | Luke 9:20 | BradK | 220834 | ||
Hello frog..., Time permits me to only offer a few. Matt 27:11 "Now Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor questioned Him, saying, "Are You the King of the Jews?" And Jesus said to him, "It is as you say." (NASB) John 8:53 "Surely You are not greater than our father Abraham, who died? The prophets died too; whom do You make Yourself out to be?" (NASB) Also, in Luke 9:20, "And He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?" And Peter answered and said, "The Christ of God." (NASB) I hope this helps, BradK |
||||||
357 | Proof-John 14:15-26 that the Holy Spirit | Acts 5:3 | BradK | 220832 | ||
Hello T-Baby, To understand this passage, you need to consider it's context, and supporting verses. I think simple a reading of vs. 16-17 would rule out the Holy Spirit being "just a vague influence for good" "I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever; that is the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not see Him or know Him, but you know Him because He abides with you and will be in you."(NASB) Here are 3 proofs to consider: 1. The Greek word for "Helper" or "Comforter" is parakleton. It is a Noun, masculine in gender and singular in number. It's clearly a reference to a Person, not simply a "vague influence"! 2. In 1 John 2:1, we have a similar useage, "...And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous;" (NASB) The same Greek word, 'parakleton' is used, also a noun, masculine in gender and singular in number. The Apostle John is being descriptive of this "Advocate" as a Person, none other than the Holy Spirit. It is further proof of the Divinity of this "Advocate". 3. Would it make any sense for a "vague influence" to: 'Be with you forever'; '...know Him because He abides with you and will be in you' These are attributes of a Person, not an "inlfuence". Speaking the Truth in Love, BradK |
||||||
358 | Summarising the story of Revelation | Rev 1:1 | BradK | 220817 | ||
Hello Rosanna, The best, most concise summary comes from the book itself- Rev. 1:1, "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show to His bond-servants, the things which must soon take place; and He sent and communicated it by His angel to His bond-servant John," (NASB) I hope this helps, BradK |
||||||
359 | who are the 2 witnesses in Revelation 11 | Rev 11:3 | BradK | 220776 | ||
Hello Ron R, Welcome to the Forum. Rev 11;3 reads, "And I will grant authority to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy for twelve hundred and sixty days, clothed in sackcloth." (NASB) The use of "my two witnesses" may seem to support that John knew who they were. However, scripture does not specifically name them. This leads to some theological speculation. Many have thought that it might be Moses and Elijah. IMO, it may be Enoch and Elijah as these 2 are the only one who were "translated", not seeing death! The Commentary Critical notes, "But those of Moses when witnessing for God against Pharaoh (the type of Antichrist, the last and greatest foe of Israel), turning the waters into blood, and smiting with plagues; and of Elijah (the witness for God in an almost universal apostasy of Israel, a remnant of seven thousand, however, being left, as the 144,000 sealed, Revelation 7:1-8 ) causing fire by his word to devour the enemy, and shutting heaven, so that it rained not for three years and six months, the very time (1260 days) during which the two witnesses prophesy. Moreover, the words "witness" and "prophesy" are usually applied to individuals, not to abstractions (compare Psalms 52:8 ). DE BURGH thinks Elijah and Moses will again appear, as Malachi 4:5 Malachi 4:6 seems to imply (compare Matthew 17:11 , Acts 3:21 ). Moses and Elijah appeared with Christ at the Transfiguration, which foreshadowed His coming millennial kingdom. As to Moses, compare Deuteronomy 34:5 Deuteronomy 34:6 , Jude 1:9 . Elias' genius and mode of procedure bears the same relation to the "second" coming of Christ, that John the Baptist's did to the first coming [BENGEL]. Many of the early Church thought the two witnesses to be Enoch and Elijah. This would avoid the difficulty of the dying a second time, for these have never yet died; but, perhaps, shall be the witnesses slain." I hope this helps, BradK |
||||||
360 | is the father representing the three | Deut 6:4 | BradK | 220771 | ||
Hello wejelly, No, the Father doesn't represent the three, per se. God is One, yet in 3 distinct persons; God the Father, Jesus the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Each are distinct, yet equally God! So, we can and do refer to each as God. I hope this helps, BradK |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ] Next > Last [81] >> |