Results 241 - 260 of 333
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: Chusarcik Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
241 | What 'syour opinion on original question | Matthew | Chusarcik | 93804 | ||
Thanks, I'll bookmark that website. Chusarcik | ||||||
242 | Does this make it more clear? | Matthew | Chusarcik | 93819 | ||
Thanks | ||||||
243 | Asking the original question again? | Matthew | Chusarcik | 93826 | ||
Thanks for answering the question. Chusarcik | ||||||
244 | What 'syour opinion on original question | Matthew | Chusarcik | 93831 | ||
Actually, I was just curious. What I thought was going to be a simple question with a quick answer wrought many dissimilar, long diatribes as replies. That was why I kept asking respondees to please just answer the question. My intention was not for this to blow up into such proportions! Chusarcik | ||||||
245 | Question about meaning of turning cheek | Matt 5:39 | Chusarcik | 89641 | ||
I have a question regarding Matthew chapter 5 verse 38 to 42. My Bible study group was reviewing the part of verse 38 where Jesus says, "If someone strikes you on the cheek, turn to him the other also." One of our study members said a Jewish teacher told her that you would need to understand Jewish history to understand this sentance and that turning the other cheek was a form of insult at that time, in other words, if someone insulted you by slapping you, not appreciating what you're giving, you'd be basically righting them off by turning the other cheek. Does anyone know if this is true? It does seem the Christian is to draw the line when he's determined continuing to give would be unappreciated by the receiver such as in Matthew 7:6 where it says not to cast pearls before swine. Thanks, Chusarcik | ||||||
246 | Is this the opinion of most Christians? | Matt 5:39 | Chusarcik | 89648 | ||
Thankyou, that answer seems to make sense to me. I'm wondering if in general, Christians agree with your opinion. Is there anyone else out there that would care to comment? Chusarcik | ||||||
247 | Is this the opinion of most Christians? | Matt 5:39 | Chusarcik | 89685 | ||
Thankyou, Chusarcik |
||||||
248 | Question about meaning of turning cheek | Matt 5:39 | Chusarcik | 89686 | ||
Very Good,Thanks. Chusarcik | ||||||
249 | Is Matthew 10:5 fulfillment of prohecy? | Matt 10:5 | Chusarcik | 90521 | ||
In Matthew Chapter 10 verse 5 Jesus instructs his apostles to spread the gospel to the Jews but not the Gentiles at that time. I understand that Jesus told the apostles this because the gospel was to come FIRST to the Jews as God's chosen people, but I wondered if this verse is also a fulfillment of old testament prophecy? Chusarcik | ||||||
250 | No, just wandered. Thanks, Chusarcik | Matt 10:5 | Chusarcik | 90638 | ||
No, just wandered. Thanks, Chusarcik | ||||||
251 | Why did Jesus say to stay in one house? | Matt 10:11 | Chusarcik | 90530 | ||
Why does Jesus instruct his apostles in Matthew 10:11 to stay in one home per town rather than move from house to house? | ||||||
252 | Why did Jesus say to stay in one house? | Matt 10:11 | Chusarcik | 90639 | ||
Oh, thanks! Chusarcik |
||||||
253 | Question on Matthew 10:23 | Matt 10:23 | Chusarcik | 90519 | ||
In Matthew 10:23 my NIV Bible, Jesus says to his apostles that they will not finish going through the cities of Israel before the Son of Man comes? This can't mean Jesus' 2nd coming will happen before they finished going through the towns because he still hasn't come? So what does Jesus mean here? | ||||||
254 | Am I understanding right? | Matt 10:23 | Chusarcik | 90637 | ||
So you think it is addressing all disciples and means the gospel will not finished being spread througout all Israel until Jesus' 2nd coming? Just trying to understand. Chusarcik | ||||||
255 | Am I understanding right? | Matt 10:23 | Chusarcik | 90679 | ||
THANKS,CHUSARCIK | ||||||
256 | Just one more question on Matthew 10:23 | Matt 10:23 | Chusarcik | 90759 | ||
In reading the previous answer for my question on Matthew 10:23, I understand that Jesus indicates to the apoostles that the message of the gospel will not finish reaching all nations before Jesus' 2nd coming, but in thinking about this I have another question: Why does this verse say the apostles won't finish spreading the gospel specifically to all the cities of Israel if rather than to all cities of the world if we are to take it that Jesus meant all nations here? Chusarcik | ||||||
257 | Any other opinions on this? | Matt 10:23 | Chusarcik | 90755 | ||
I will do that and does anyone have further comments answering what Jesus means in Matthew 10:23 where He says He'll return again before the apostles will have gone through all of the cities of Israel if we are to imply Jesus really meant all nations when He said all cities of Israel? Chusarcik | ||||||
258 | How does Israel represent all nations? | Matt 10:23 | Chusarcik | 90761 | ||
I believe you're right and my question isn't about the time of Jesus' return, but more about why he specifically stated in 10:23 that the message wouldn't reach all the CITIES OF ISRAEL before Jesus' return if we are to imply that cities of Israel here really meant all nations. Can anyone clarify? Chusarcik | ||||||
259 | Good info but doesn't answer my question | Matt 10:23 | Chusarcik | 90766 | ||
Thanks for your quick response and the informaiton is appreciated, but that is not my question. I'm not looking for the time of Jesus' return at all. My question is whether or not we are to imply that Jesus meant ALL NATIONS in Matthew 10:23 when he referred to the phrase, "cities of Israel" not being all reached by the time He returned. Can anyone answer this question? Chusarcik | ||||||
260 | Thanks and sorry to pester you | Matt 10:23 | Chusarcik | 90822 | ||
EdB, I guess I'm just having trouble with the wording of the scripture? Your answers makes sense, but each time I go back and read 10:23 literally, it looks like Jesus was saying to the apostles they would face persecution, but that He, Jesus would return before the apostles reached all the cities in Israel. How do we get they wouldn't run out of cities from that statement? I appreciate all the work you're putting into your answers and am just trying to reach an understanding that matches what the verse says, Chusarcik |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ] Next > Last [17] >> |