Results 161 - 180 of 305
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: Radioman Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
161 | What does "3" stand for in the Bible? | Isaiah | Radioman | 24333 | ||
When you labeled your previous post "Speculation.....," I assumed you meant casiv's speculation. That's the only speculation I've seen in this thread. I know I'm going to regret that I dignified your posting with a reply. But, here goes! You write: "you cannot prove one number wrong that Bullinger has proven." Bullinger has proven NOTHING. He instructs NO ONE. He has NOTHING to say. None of us has to prove Bullinger wrong. The burden of proof is upon the one who makes the assertion. You assert that there is something to Bullinger's theory/fantasy of numbers. Therefore, the burden of proof is on you, son. Does it say "Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the *numbers* of God?" I don't think so. You would do better to toss Bullinger's book into the dumpster, stop *writing* to the forum and, instead, start *reading* your Bible without the "help" of crackpot writers like Bullinger. While you're at it, you need to lose Puppetmaster. |
||||||
162 | How close can we get to God? | Is 62:5 | Radioman | 4383 | ||
I believe there is no limit to how close one can get to God, except perhaps the limits we place upon ourselves. "As close as our calling requiures." What does that mean? Define calling. Do you mean the more important job we have in our service to God, the more we rate getting closer to Him? Or that the more superior our ministry is to that of others, the closer we get than they do? I have no Scripture to support the idea that there is a limit on how close we can get to God nor to prove that how close we can get depends on our calling. Do you have a CLEAR verse of Scripture to support your assertion? I notice there's not one verse of Scripture cited in your answer to Nolan Keck's question. |
||||||
163 | How close can we get to God? | Is 62:5 | Radioman | 4672 | ||
I shall be eternally grateful that I am NOT Benny Hinn. | ||||||
164 | Does Jeremiah 14 and 15 relate to U.S. | Jeremiah | Radioman | 19284 | ||
Ihavefavor: At times, we all use words without realizing or knowing the actual meaning or origin of them. I do not condemn you. I merely point out how the dictionary defines the word "gee." "*gee* (interjection) Used as a mild expletive or exclamation of surprise. [Alteration of JESUS.]" (American Heritage Dictionary) |
||||||
165 | The Lord pronounced judgement on the for | Amos | Radioman | 6123 | ||
. | ||||||
166 | The Lord pronounced judgement on the for | Amos | Radioman | 6124 | ||
. | ||||||
167 | The Lord pronounced judgement on the for | Amos | Radioman | 6125 | ||
. | ||||||
168 | The Lord pronounced judgement on foreign | Amos | Radioman | 6126 | ||
. | ||||||
169 | Malachi-John 17 brain teaser | Malachi | Radioman | 1573 | ||
To be on the safe side, I capitalized EVERY pronoun in John 17:1-26. The total was not evenly divisible by three. Did I do it wrong? | ||||||
170 | should you tithe | Malachi | Radioman | 15217 | ||
Please search for your question before asking it. | ||||||
171 | what doe's matthew 7:12-14 says? | Matthew | Radioman | 25270 | ||
The best way to find out what it says is to look it up in the Bible and read it. | ||||||
172 | Why is it translated "if", not "since"? | Matt 4:6 | Radioman | 15116 | ||
Question: "Is there a translation thst says "since", not "if" ... becuase that is the literal translation. "-Why don't translators do a better job on this word?" Answer: In the English language in a hypothetical statement, "if" and "since" are often used interchangeably. In such a case they are used to mean THE SAME THING. As someone else recently asked, "Steve, apparently the misunderstanding on this thread arose from your lack of understanding . . . In short, you didn't understand the question. Why, then, did you answer it? "And how can you presume to teach this forum in the nuances of meaning of the ancient Hebrew and Greek tongues when you yourself rarely post on this forum a single sentence in English that is free from either grammatical or orthograhic errors?" Finally, my question for you is: Why don't you do a better job of bashing the translators? Surely you've had enough practice. |
||||||
173 | Is the Jesus the Lord and God of Satan? | Matt 4:7 | Radioman | 15118 | ||
He isn't. Jesus is merely quoting Scripture. |
||||||
174 | Where can I find the Beatitudes? | Matt 5:3 | Radioman | 5551 | ||
You will find the Beatitudes in Matthew 5:3-12. A parallel passage is also to be found in the gospel of Luke. | ||||||
175 | Light and Good Works | Matt 5:16 | Radioman | 8006 | ||
So that..."they may BECAUSE OF YOUR GOOD DEEDS, as they observe them, glorify God in the day of visitation." 1 Pet 2:12 Keep your behavior excellent among the Gentiles, so that in the thing in which they slander you as evildoers, they may because of your good deeds, as they observe them, glorify God in the day of visitation. Matt 5:16 *light so shine*." A godly life gives convincing testimony of the saving power of God. That brings Him glory. Compare 1 Pet 2:12." (MacArthur Study Bible) |
||||||
176 | Did Christ not fulfill the law? | Matt 5:17 | Radioman | 22106 | ||
casiv: You are correct. I agree with you regarding freewill, putting somebody down and Matthew 5:17-19 -- the three subjects all go together like a horse and carriage. To answer your previous post, I can only say: I give up. Why did the chicken cross the road? (If you don't know the answer, it's OK to ask Puppetmaster.) Radioman |
||||||
177 | Did Christ not fulfill the law? | Matt 5:17 | Radioman | 22107 | ||
casiv: I realize that this is a public forum and anyone has the right to attempt to answer any posted question. But, I suggest that before you attempt to answer questions that were NOT addressed to you, that you first answer questions which WERE addressed to you. Since you are known for answering questions with riddles, for evading questions for weeks at a time, and doing everything but giving a straight answer, perhaps you are not quite ready to take on any new questions. Answer the old ones first. Also, it would be helpful if your answers had some remote relevance to the questions being asked. And how can you accuse or imply that someone else is putting you down when you yourself have spent half your time on the forum hurling curses and judgments at other people? |
||||||
178 | holding the light with dirty hands? | Matt 5:20 | Radioman | 15114 | ||
"Matthew 22:37-40 is where haMashiach reduces Law and the Prophets." Jesus in no way "reduces" the law and the prophets. In standard English we would say He "summarizes" the law and the prophets. Summarizes, not reduces. Jesus never reduces, trivializes, does away with or undoes the law. Take your own advice and don't read into the passage something that is not there. |
||||||
179 | holding the light with dirty hands? | Matt 5:20 | Radioman | 15138 | ||
se·man·tics "1 : the study of meanings" Yes, it is. If/since semantics is defined as the study of meanings, then the entire Bible is about semantics, isn't it? That's what we do when we study the Bible -- we study meanings. |
||||||
180 | Did you forgive the Tuesday terrorists? | Matt 6:14 | Radioman | 16136 | ||
Have I forgiven the terrorist organization or person(s) who planned and executed the attack on America? Or do I forgive Palestinians gleefully dancing in the streets over the loss of innocent American life? Not yet. If and when the above person(s) a) repent and ask for forgiveness; b) change their present intentions to murder Americans; and c) cease and desist their murderous attacks, then and only then will I be obligated to forgive them. |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ] Next > Last [16] >> |