Results 121 - 140 of 281
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: jcsav Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
121 | jcsav, What to you mean? | Acts 9:3 | jcsav | 143263 | ||
Never mind. Have a nice day! | ||||||
122 | jcsav, Why isn't believing being saved? | Acts 16:31 | jcsav | 142837 | ||
I do not like to say what God can't do. I can not find anywhere in the New Testament where God saved anyone without one of His agents. God's Salvation is not a "on my own" Salvation. | ||||||
123 | jcsav, Why isn't believing being saved? | Acts 16:31 | jcsav | 142838 | ||
Because one believe do not mean that they are saved. Maybe I am not wording it correctly. How about in Revelation where it says the Fearful will have their place with the unbelieving. It did not say that the Fearful was unbelieving. It also list other vices. | ||||||
124 | jcsav, Why isn't believing being saved? | Acts 16:31 | jcsav | 142840 | ||
Seacher, I agree with you that a Preacher is still need. But if we are going to ignore Scripture because of the sign of the times. Then why bother? Tongues was in that day. Now is Preaching, also in that day? | ||||||
125 | jcsav, Why isn't believing being saved? | Acts 16:31 | jcsav | 142896 | ||
Adam was in the Old Testament. I did say, New Testament. Show me one in the New Testament. Jesus didn't give Paul all he need when he was speaking to him from Heaven. Did he? Did he come down from Heaven and Baptize Paul. No. And that is a part of Salvation. | ||||||
126 | jcsav Cite source Fearful w/ unbelieving | Acts 16:31 | jcsav | 142897 | ||
Praise the Lord! and Thank you! | ||||||
127 | Scripture supporting Sprinkling/Immersio | Rom 6:1 | jcsav | 146065 | ||
I do not agree that it is overused. No Scripture is overused if it is used in "Truth." It is for the correction of those who are in error. You know, as well as I, that it is clear and to the point. | ||||||
128 | Scripture supporting Sprinkling/Immersio | Rom 6:1 | jcsav | 146066 | ||
Acts 10:47 "Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we? Note: Peter COMMANDED (seeing that they had already, received the Holy Ghost) that they be baptised. He did not ask them if they wanted to. How can you say, that "water" have nothing to do with being baptised with the Holy Ghost? Also read 1John 3:5. This is the One baptism. You can not separate them. |
||||||
129 | CDBJ- Why the Chinese characters? | Rom 6:1 | jcsav | 146068 | ||
I must be having trouble with my brower too. | ||||||
130 | Scriptures did not say | Rom 8:13 | jcsav | 121215 | ||
And did I say that they did? Did Daboniel respect the silence of the Scriptures and not speculate? Then, why are your statements directed at me? Is it because of the Name that we bear (Jesus). Why should I have to prove they did speak when we all know that ALL the one in the upper room did, including All the Apostles. The Scriptures do say that. | ||||||
131 | Scriptures did not say | Rom 8:13 | jcsav | 121242 | ||
If this was a ball game, then the score would be ten to two. And the ten would win. But, this is not a game. It is the Word of God. And I repeat, the Scriptures do not say that they did not speak. It is silent on the subject. That is not to say, they did NOT speak. And at times those that stood by either "heard" or "saw" when the Holy Ghost was given. How can one hear or see without a "sign"? | ||||||
132 | filled with holy spirit? | Rom 8:13 | jcsav | 121245 | ||
Searcher, I am not speaking of the Gift of Tongues. I am speaking of the initial filling of the Holy Ghost. That is not a feeling. No more than it was in the upper room. The reason some do not want to except this, is they want to find another way in. Well, there is none. You must come by Jesus Christ. | ||||||
133 | filled with holy spirit? | Rom 8:13 | jcsav | 121286 | ||
You do not know the difference in the Promised Gift of the Holy Ghost and the Holy Spirit as it moved in the Old Testment? Why do you think that the ampified Acts 2:16 states: "But (instead) this is (the beginning of) what was spoken through the prophet Joel:" If as you say the initial filling of the Holy Spirit was in Exodus 31:3, some thousands of years before. Then how can it be the beginning in Acts 2:16. | ||||||
134 | Scriptures did not say | Rom 8:13 | jcsav | 121294 | ||
How do admitting I'll wrong make me more convincing in a discussion of my position? If I said that I was wrong, then I would be a liar and a false witness. I can not honour man and God. | ||||||
135 | Scriptures did not say | Rom 8:13 | jcsav | 121298 | ||
There is but One God. Just as he said. Not Three that make up one. And to keep from calling God a liar outright. You come up with this Great Mistery of Trinity . And why? Because you can not really call him Lord. Why? because you can do this only by the Holy Ghost. Which you SAY you have. | ||||||
136 | Scriptures did not say | Rom 8:13 | jcsav | 121300 | ||
I did not base anything on when the Bible was silent You did. Ten times the Bible did not say one way or the other. At least two times (every word of God is established ) it plainly states that they was filled with the Holy Ghost and spoke in tongues. If you obey God's Word we would not even have a need for this discussion. That is the underlining point. My argument is not one the Ten. It is on the two that tells us plainly. | ||||||
137 | filled with holy spirit? | Rom 8:13 | jcsav | 121308 | ||
Why do you give more weight to what commentors say than the Brackets in the Amplified? What about John 7:38-39. KJV. John was born with the Holy Spirit, true. But this is not the Born again exsperience that Jesus spoke of When he said you must be born of the water and the Spirit to see the Kingdom of God. John never had this. Jesus first had to be Glorified. | ||||||
138 | filled with holy spirit? | Rom 8:13 | jcsav | 121324 | ||
But this was not the Promised Holy Ghost (Spirit) that they received in the upper room. This could not come until Jesus was Glorified. Born of a woman there is none greater than John the Baptist. But the least in the Kingdom of God is greater than John. | ||||||
139 | filled with holy spirit? | Rom 8:13 | jcsav | 121325 | ||
Ex 31:3, "And I have filled himwith the Spirit of God, in wisdom and ability, in understanding and intelligence, and in knowledge, and in all kinds of craftsmanship. (4) To devise skillful works, to work in gold , and in silver, and in bronze (5) And in all kinds of craftsmanship. (6) ..... I have given wisdom and ability to MAKE all that I have commanded you. This had to do with cutting stone and etc. Now read Acts 2:17-18, see the BIG difference. God in the Old Testment moved on individuals for a the task at hand. And sometimes he even toke his Spirit Back and placed it on someone else. In the Promised, he promised to never leave or forsake us. |
||||||
140 | Scriptures did not say | Rom 8:13 | jcsav | 121327 | ||
Acts 10:44-48,"While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all who were listening to the Message. (45) And the believers from among the circumcised (the Jews) who came with Peter were surprised and amazed, because the free gift of the Holy Spirit had been bestowed and poured out largely even on the Gentiles." Now ask yourself, How did they know? The answer is given in verse (46) For they heard them talking in (unknown) tongues (Languages) and extolling and magnifying God. Note: this is clearly not the gift of tongues, the minor gift that you called it. This is the Holy Spirit. There is a difference. And where is Paul rule about speaking in no more than twos. Where is the interpreters. Where was it in the upper room. I will tell you. They do not apply. |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ] Next > Last [15] >> |