Results 1 - 20 of 749
|
||||||
Results from: Answers On or After: Thu 12/31/70 Author: mark d seyler Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | hat is deliverance ,How do u get deliver | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 157394 | ||
Hi Riebrown, Welcome to the forum! Can you be more specific? Deliverance from what? Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
2 | Exodus 18, NT passage parallels and how | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 157942 | ||
Hi mttheway, Are you asking this because you don't know the answer? Or are you asking to test us? I don't mean to offend, please forgive me if I did. I only ask because it feels like a test. Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
3 | Kings Calamity | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 157944 | ||
I give up! :-) Who was it? Mark |
||||||
4 | Kings Calamity | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 157947 | ||
Hi Gospelpearl, How about King David? The question was asked by Nathan, "what should be done to that man?" Mark |
||||||
5 | Exodus 18, NT passage parallels and how | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 157948 | ||
Hi mttheway, What have you got for the first part? That may help to lead us tot he answer for the second part. Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
6 | cereal without the milk | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 159107 | ||
Hi Bronx, There is a scriptural command to remember the cross, or more specifically, the work Jesus did on the cross. Luke 22:19 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. 1 Cor 11:23 For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed too bread; 24 And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. 25 After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. 26 For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come. We are to identify ourselves with Jesus' death, because His death was our death, and we mustn't forget that. Phi 2:5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. Jesus' obedience to the death of the cross is our example for Christian living. Any discussion of how we life the Christian life must ultimately be centered on Jesus, on His life, death, and resurrection. His death allows us to be forgiven. His death is exemplifies His life. I, for one, do not see how we could, or why we would, exclude Jesus' death upon the cross from our thoughts, conversation, study, and teaching. Jesus said "If any man would be My disciple, let him deny himself, pick up his cross, and follow Me." We do not leave the cross behind us, we make it our own. God bless you! Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
7 | Deceived | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 159507 | ||
Herod | ||||||
8 | Do you have scriptural support? | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 159520 | ||
matt 2:16 | ||||||
9 | Sons of God | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 159780 | ||
Hi Noveta, I can see that you have already studied this, so let me simply offer a few points, of why I believe these "sons of God" are fallen angels. The term "sons of God" is used in a technical sense throughout the Bible, referring to those who are created by God, as opposed to being born from another: Adam (Luke 3), angels (fallen and not)(Gen, Job), and Christians (John 1 and others). Jesus specifically said "angels in heaven" neither marry nor are given in marraige. Why was this distinction needed? If the sons of God in Gen 6 were humans, why were their progeny different than normal? I hope this helps! Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
10 | What is progeny? | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 159787 | ||
Hi Noveta, If the "sons of God" were the sons of Seth, and the "daughters of men" were the daughters of Cain, then why would their children be any different than any others? The indication is that these children shared common traits that set them apart from the other children. Those that promote the idea of the "sons of God" being human say they are from "the Godly line of Seth". But when did a believer marrying a non-believer cause their children to be born "giants", or whatever else the "nephilim" were? But meanwhile, the whole world, with the exception of Noah's family, was judged wicked, and was destroyed from the earth. Did this "Godly line" remain Godly through nine generations, only to become completely and entirely corrupt in the tenth generation? Is there any scriptural basis to support that? Love in Christ, mark |
||||||
11 | did Judas repent | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 159891 | ||
There is no record of Judas repenting. Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
12 | Man and woman regard Marriage | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 159895 | ||
What is your question? | ||||||
13 | who was the weeing prophet? | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 159897 | ||
duplicate question | ||||||
14 | who was the weeing prophet | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 159899 | ||
I am not aware of any prophet described as such. Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
15 | tell me what you think | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 159901 | ||
Hi JimmyHen, Mohammed did not claim to be Christ, so he was not a false Christ. Since he did claim to be a prophet of God, and his writings disagree with scripture, he would in fact be a false prophet. Osama-bin-Laden, if he claims to be a prophet, (I do not know if he does or not), would be a false prophet. Since there was nothing "miraculous" about the terrorist attack on 9/11 (anyone can crash an airplane into a building), I do not believe this is what the Bible is talking about as "signs and wonders". Whenever this phrase is used it seems to be referring to the working of miraculous signs. In the Revelation, we are told the beast will cause fire to come from the sky, for instance. This will be a deceiving "sign and wonder". What did happen that was miraculous on 9/11 was that only a small fraction of the people who were supposed to be in the Twin Towers were actually there. Countless storys have been shared of "a changed dentist appointment", a "flat tire", "sudden headache", family illness", and so on. God spared many thousands on that day, in spite of what these criminals intended. I hope this helps! Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
16 | not understaning... | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 159908 | ||
Hi Amanda, To be unequally yoked is to be paired with someone with whom you do not share the same degree of faith, or maturity, or commitment. This is when you want to go to church 4 times a week, and do daily devotions, and your husband wants to watch football. Or if you want to give a tithe to the church, and leave it at that, and your husband wants to sell the house, the car, donate everything, and become a missionary in Africa. Unless you share the same vision as your spouse, and the same faith, there can be trouble. "A little leaven" is a little sin. If you tolerate it, you will find it everywhere. From what you have said, I would agree with you that there are some concerns about your marrying this man. I recommend the both of you see the pastor of your church for pre-marital counselling. I would recommend that you not tie the knot too quickly, but instead focus on the Bible, prayer, and fellowship with other Christians (not just him), and give yourself time to grow in the Lord before doing anything permanent. God bless you! Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
17 | End Times interpretation? | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 160556 | ||
This is a fairly involved question, and there are a number of different opinions. I would suggest that you visit www.prophecyupdate.com They have some fairly easy to digest information. I have developed some fairly in-depth material which I would be happy to send to you. If you wish to take a look, contact me at markdseyler@yahoo.com I hope this helps! Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
18 | After his own kind | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 160723 | ||
Hi Noveta, Many people have reached the same conclusions as you have, and that can also be meaningful towards determining if you are on the right track or not. If I come up with something in the Bible that no one, over the past couple of thousand years, has come up with, long odds are that I am reading something into it that isn't there. My pastor counts this passage as "waiting for more information." You are certainly not out in left field for reaching the conclusion you have. Many would say I am for thinking it was fallen angels. Now, whether or not the fallen angels would or wouldn't engage in this sort of behavior again, some think that they did. There were anakim after the flood, as Isreal entered the promised land. Some believe that the fallen angels again propagated to try to prevent them from taking the land. This activity may be severely limited because the fallen angels who are not currently in chains of darkness may not want to join the ones who are - the deterent value of their incarceration. There is an interesting little verse in Daniel, of the final human kingdom: Dan 2:43 And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay. It is argued that that which mingles with the seed of man, not cleaving to it, is not the seed of man itself. Its an interesting point. We have many people throughout the centuries who have engaged in enequally yoked marraige. The very church itself, as exemplified in the letter of Jesus to Pergamos, wed to the world. These were not judged by world-wide cataclysm. I fully agree with you that context plays a strong role in determining the meaning of scripture. A correct interpretation will not bend the meanings of the words used, will take into account the entire passage and its context, will be in harmony with all other scriptures. I understand that Hebrew especially can have a variety of meanings to the same word depending on the context (If there is a Hebrew scholar out there, please correct me if I am wrong!). The main thing in understanding the Bible is to let the Author explain it to you. If your heart is open to the leading of the Lord, and you give every indication that it is, you can come to a scripture, pray about it, study it, meditate upon it, discuss it, read about it, all of these, and you will reach certain conclusions about it. Perhaps you will be right, and perhaps you will be wrong. Perhaps you will have seen one level, and God will yet show you more meaning in time. We are not always right about our conclusions, you're not, I'm not, but we learn as we go. The good thing is that God will not stop teaching us. Its ok to reach a point where we say, "that's all I can get from this passage for now, but as the Lord leads, I am open to revisit it later." I can't tell you how many times I have revisited a passage and seen so much more that before, sometimes changing my view, sometimes expanding it. One day, we will all be in complete agreement about all of these things, in the meantime, we have this cool forum to share our ideas on. Glad you're here! Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
19 | Men and Angels | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 160732 | ||
Hi Noveta, Men went after the angels in Sodom. Holy angels were in control of the situation, and nothing happened. Assuming that it was angels in Gen. 6, it was the angels going after women, and again, the fallen angels were in control of the situation. Angels have more power than do men. Whenever angels appeared to people in the OT, they are described as appearing as men. The angels in Jude that "left their first place" would not be the same as those that are sent by God, because they are being punished by God. As to how these unions would creat a new species? I don't know the mechanics. But I think that they did. I could be wrong. It certainly is very strange. I hope this does in fact help! :-) Love in Christ, Mark |
||||||
20 | Unkown ? | Bible general Archive 3 | mark d seyler | 161352 | ||
... | ||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [38] >> |