Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | The Doctrines Please? | Bible general Archive 2 | Hank | 127466 | ||
Sir Pent: Hello once again and greetings from Arkansas where it is cool weather, believe it or not, for the Dog Days of summer! ...... As you know I've been an active participant in Forum doings since near its beginning, and I know of no "unwritten rules." Since you admit to knowing what they are, it might be of help to reveal your secrets :-) ........ Concerning debates, that issue has been addressed and clearly stated: this is not a Forum that permits infinite "discussion" and debates. Various points of view are sure to emerge and are allowable, of course, insofar as they do not foster divisiveness, push denominational biases, result in ad hominem insults, deny the authority of Scripture or the deity of Christ, denigrate orthodox Christianity, etc. All these guidelines are written, are clearly visible to users and viewers alike, and there should be no mystery at all about what is allowed on this Forum and what is not. Click on "About the Forum" on the left of the home page, note the large box of information that appears at the top of the home page, and read other usage guides that appear above the "submit post" button. ...... Concerning the "organizational problems" that you feel exists, I'd recommend you bring your thoughts and concerns to the attention of the Lockman Foundation. They and they alone are enpowered to make changes in format, etc. --Hank | ||||||
2 | The Doctrines Please? | Bible general Archive 2 | Sir Pent | 127521 | ||
Personal note......................................................... Hi Hank, It's good to talk with you again, and I'm glad that you're keeping cool in Arkansas. I recognize that you have been with the forum since almost the very beginning (5 months longer than myself). I understand that you don't think that there are "unwritten rules" here on the forum. However as you mentioned, infinite discussion is not permitted. If a thread goes on for too long, the participants are asked to stop posting to it. That rule is not written anywhere that I know of, yet it does happen. You also mentioned that viewpoints are allowed as long as they do not "foster divisiveness, push denominational biases, result in ad hominem insults, deny the authority of Scripture or the deity of Christ, denigrate orthodox Christianity, etc." These rules are stated on the forum, which is good, however they are applied inconsistently. For instance, the subject of Predestination and Free Will is a denominationally biased subject that can lead to divisiveness and these threads are always restricted. But the necessity of Baptism for salvation is also a denominationally biased subject that can lead to divisiveness, yet these threads are often not restricted on this forum. This indicates that there are unwritten rules of applying the general stated rules. I appreciate your suggestion to bring my "organizational" suggestions to the Lockman Foundation's attention. However, I don't think that they have much interest in my ideas. I made many suggestions almost 3 years ago, none of which have been implemented. These included deleting duplicate posts, combining similar posts, limiting initial responses to questions, staying on topic, requiring a consensus statement for each thread, allowing symbols, adding a spell checker, adding a chat room, and labeling posts with headings. For reference please see post #'s 17840, 17951, 18277, 18278. Thanks again for all your dedication to this forum and the time and effort that you put into it. You won't know until heaven how many people's lives have been helped by your input here. |
||||||