Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | What about so-called revelation knowledg | Bible general Archive 1 | inmyheart | 81843 | ||
Raidoman2, You judge and attack men of God and then you push your recommended web site? I went to Kenneth Copeland's web site and this is his mission statement: The mission of Kenneth Copeland Ministries and Eagle Mountain International Church is to teach Christians worldwide who they are in Christ Jesus and how to live a victorious life in their covenant rights and privileges. The fulfillment of that mission takes place when those believers become rooted and grounded enough in God's Word to reach out and teach others these same principles. We are called to lead people, primarily born-again believers, to the place where they operate proficiently in the biblical principles of faith, love, healing, prosperity, redemption and righteousness, and to the place where they can share those principles with others. We are called to assist believers in becoming rooted, grounded and established in the Word of God by teaching them to give God's Word first place in their lives (Colossians 1:23, Psalm 112). We are called to reveal the mysteries, the victorious revelations of God's Word, that have been hidden from the ages (Colossians 1:25-28). We are called to build an army of mature believers, bringing them from milk to meat, from religion to reality. We are called to train them to become skillful in the word of righteousness, to stand firm in the spiritual warfare against the kingdom of darkness (Hebrews 5:12-14, Ephesians 6:10-18). We are called to proclaim that "Jesus Is Lord" from the top of the world to the bottom and all the way around.The vision is being accomplished through the ministry efforts of Kenneth Copeland Ministries, Eagle Mountain International Church and staff on a worldwide scale through the local church and the use of television, campaigns, conventions, books, tapes, recordings and personal correspondence and is multiplied through the financial support of other ministries of like purpose. Before you continue your campaign to discourage others, why not read what Kenneth has to say, here is his site; http://www.kcm.org/ God bless |
||||||
2 | How do you answer the criticisms? | Bible general Archive 1 | winstonchurchill | 81888 | ||
Inmyheart, I have reviewed carefully your post and the website which Radioman suggests. I, frankly, had never paid any attention at all to Copeland. I had surfed past his many programs, but, as with most TV preachers, ignored them as (presumably) aiming mostly at more contributions to, in turn, remain on the air. So, I was intrigued to find someone who really subscribed to his views. Some of the criticisms of Radioman's suggested website seemed weak (i.e. appeals to 'tradition' and 'systematic theology'), but a couple of the criticisms seemed quite serious. I would be interested in your response to these: "Copeland seems vehemently opposed to sound reasoning. "Believers are not to be led by logic," he writes. "We are not even to be led by good sense" (emphasis in original).93 Copeland's statement is apparently based on his mistaken belief that the "ministry of Jesus was never governed by logic or reason....He was not led by logic. He was not led by the mind."94 Isaiah 1:18, on the other hand, quotes God as saying, "Come now, let us reason together." Second, Copeland fails to observe some basic principles of biblical interpretation (including fundamental rules of grammar and usage), at times relying instead on so-called revelation knowledge (information allegedly derived from direct, one-on-one communication with God). His neglect in this area is made embarrassingly apparent by his gross misunderstanding of key words (e.g., faith) and utter disregard of the context in which they appear." Do you (as an apparent supporter of Copeland) agree or disagree with these points? By the way, your summary of Copeland's intentions are not dispositive. Many are well-intentioned. I think it would be better to focus on whether Copeland (i) rejects reason (ii) rejects contextual interpretation of Biblical passages and (iii) believes in 'revelation knowledge'. This latter point (if true) strikes me as rather Mormon-like or RCC-like, seeming to offer an accretionary view of special revelation as opposed to the completed special revelation of the Bible as constituted. How do you respond to that? |
||||||
3 | How do you answer the criticisms? | Bible general Archive 1 | lmf | 82210 | ||
There are times when you have to put aside reason and logic and stand on faith that the word of God is the truth regardless of what you are facing at that moment. When a doctor says go home and make your funeral arrangements there is nothing we can do for you. You have to believe that Jesus bore our sin sickness and disease so you have a blood bought right to live and that a long life is a promice of God. | ||||||