Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Jesus and Children as Paedobaptism? | Mark 10:14 | tumbleweed | 207347 | ||
Steve I thought bowler asked the first part as a question and was not making a supposition or speculation; "He seems to be saying, that children, at least in His day, were receiving the kingdom of God, were getting saved?" I don't understand how you see that as speculation, its a question. Then bowler asked ""How come then, we now do not permit children to be baptized?" It is a fact that there are many churches that do not baptize children before some age of accountablity which varies from church to church. I do not believe, we, referred to anyone on the forum, it seems that perhaps bowler was generalizing a bit about the word we. There are a lot of other people on the forum here and they seem to know a lot about various things in church history. How come then bowler would have to interact with a paedobaptist to get an answer? 1 Peter 3:8 To sum up, all of you be harmonius, sympathetic, brotherly, kindhearted, and humble in spirit. tumbleweed, God's Own |
||||||
2 | Jesus and Children as Paedobaptism? | Mark 10:14 | srbaegon | 207356 | ||
Hello tumbleweed, The presumption was based on a speculative idea that the passage was dealing primarily with salvation, which it is not. As for why I directed bowler to a paedobaptist, I am credo-baptist and cannot fairly relate the doctrine. Steve |
||||||
3 | Jesus and Children as Paedobaptism? | Mark 10:14 | DocTrinsograce | 207365 | ||
R. C. Sproul -- also a paedobaptist -- is one of the few such who admit that their practice is more a matter of Church history than biblical exegesis. He is also one of the few paedobaptists I know of who can correctly and soundly articulate the credobaptist perspective. I have a lot of respect for him in this regard. | ||||||