Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Jesus name baptism fulflls matt 28 | Matt 28:19 | Reformer Joe | 4616 | ||
I didn't say that God didn't become a man. God the Son did just that. God the Father did not. The Trinitarian formula is one God eternally existing in three distinct persons co-equal in nature (Father, Son, Spirit). This statement does not address my assertion that "oneness" is heresy. --Joe! |
||||||
2 | Jesus name baptism fulflls matt 28 | Matt 28:19 | Nehemiah | 4872 | ||
Where do we get this formula business. We are adding alot to the Word. And where does this Trininty term come from. I am still searching to find that in the Word. Can you help me? | ||||||
3 | Jesus name baptism fulflls matt 28 | Matt 28:19 | Reformer Joe | 4892 | ||
Read the Old Testament and the New Testament. Study everything said about God, the Father, the Son (Jesus) and the Holy Spirit (Spirit of God). There you will find the Trinity revealed. The term Trinity is credited to Tertullian. You will not find the word in the Bible. That has no bearing on the fact that God is revealed as Father, Son, and Spirit; and that the Father, Son, and Spirit are revealed as distinct from each other. The fact that the word "Trinity" is not in Scripture really is the weakest of arguments, by the way. A similar example would be this: Do you adhere to a particular theology? I hope not, because the word "theology" is nowhere to be found in the Bible. See how weak the argument is? Simply because we use terms not found in the Bible to describe what is revealed in the Bible does not make that revelation invalid. --Joe! |
||||||