Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | The excluded man at the feast was saved | Matt 22:11 | Eagle One | 29573 | ||
Greetings to RTB56 and the Christian brothers that have submitted their spiritual insight, I believe the following about the man that the Lord rebuked. (1) He was a saved man. A born again christian. (2) He was a totally carnal christian. The total number of unselfish good works that he ever did in his entire christian life was probably "very few" to "none". (3) He probably died without repenting of his sins. Please allow me to express my conviction in my own words, after which I will list some solid references. (a) I believe the wedding feast in this scripture represents the "Marriage Supper of the Lamb" rather than the "Kingdom of God". This is a parable and in Mt. 22:8 the Lord said, "My wedding reception is ready, but those invited have proved unworthy. (The nation of Israel) Verses 9-10 describe the invitation going out to the gentiles. We can assume that many refused the invitation but many responded to it. (Many refused the invitation of salvation and many accepted it.) Only those who accepted the invitation were there. (b) The man had no wedding garment because the garment represents the total unselfish good works done during his life on earth. [1 Corinthians 3 15 If anyone's work is burned, he will suffer loss; but he himself will be saved, yet so as through fire.] This man is described in this scripture. "he himself will be saved". (c) Vs. 12 tells us that the Lord called him "Friend". The Lord does not call the unsaved, "Friend". (d) Regarding vs. 13. "Binding hand and foot" and "weeping and gnashing of teeth", please allow me to repeat the words of Joseph Dillow, author of the book, THE REIGN OF THE SERVANT KINGS, Schoettle Publishing Co. Pages 350-352. "Matthew leads us to imagine a great feast of rejoicing. This joyful banquet is portrayed as occurring in the evening in a brightly lit banquet hall. Outside the banquet a relative physical darkness prevails. This darkness is not literal, but is a metaphor for the exclusion of the carnal Christian. It is not the darkness of hell. What is the meaning of "wailing and gnashing of teeth"? Those Christians who are not "sons indeed," who lack wedding garments at the wedding banquet, will not only be excluded from the joy of the banquet but will also experience profound regret, "wailing and gnashing of teeth". This phrase does not refer to the experience of the unsaved in hell in this passage. The phrase "wailing and gnashing of teeth" is found seven times in the New Testament. Even though it is used on three occasions of the experience of the unregenerate in hell, [Mt. 13:42, 50; Lk 13:28], it is also used on four occasions of the regenerate in the kingdom. [Mt. 8:12; 22:13; 24:51; 25:30. The notions of heaven or hell are simply not part of the semantic value of the words. The fact that the non believer can experience profound regret in hell in no way implies that the true Christian cannot experience profound regret in the kingdom. We are repeatedly told that, when the Lord comes, He will reward us "good and bad" [II Cor. 5:10] and that some may draw back in shame at His coming [I John 2:28]. Some Christians are going to be saved "but only as one escaping through the flames" [I Cor. 3:15] It seems that these verses adequately explain the experience of profound regret for the unfaithful Christian which Matthew calls "wailing and gnashing of teeth." Thank you. I will appreciate your responses. In Him, Eagle One |
||||||
2 | The excluded man at the feast was saved | Matt 22:11 | kalos | 29612 | ||
The excluded man at the feast was not saved. The garment does not represent the total unselfish good works done during his life on earth. The Lord does too call the unsaved, "Friend". He called Judas friend at the very moment when Judas betrayed him. He that has ears to hear let him hear. Matthew 22:11 "*a wedding garment.* All without exception were invited to the banquet, so this man is not to be viewed as a common party-crasher. In fact, all the guests were rounded up hastily from 'the highways' and therefore none could be expected to come with proper attire. That means the wedding garments were supplied by the king himself. So this man's lack of a proper garment indicates he had purposely rejected the king's own gracious provision. His affront to the king was actually a greater insult than those who refused to come at all, because he committed his impertinence in the very presence of the king. "The imagery seems to represent those who identify with the kingdom externally, profess to be Christians, belong to the church in a visible sense -- yet spurn the garment of righteousness Christ offers by seeking to establish a righteousness of their own. Ashamed to admit their own spiritual poverty, they refuse the better garment the King graciously offers -- and thus they are guilty of a horrible sin against His goodness" (MacArthur Study Bible, Word Publishing, 1997)" |
||||||