Results 1 - 20 of 33
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: danjg Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | By What Means God is Made Known to Us | Rom 10:11 | danjg | 241080 | ||
Ps. 19 is David's commentary on this subject also! | ||||||
2 | Who is the oldest person in the bible? | Gen 5:21 | danjg | 241017 | ||
Two facts about Methuselah: 1,He was the oldest man to live on planet earth; 2,Yet he died before his father did! | ||||||
3 | Who is the oldest person in the bible? | Gen 5:21 | danjg | 241009 | ||
But you also could say that Enoch is the oldest since he never died and Elijah would be second oldest! | ||||||
4 | People who never hear the gospel | John 3:3 | danjg | 239394 | ||
Yes, based on John 3:3, "unless one is born again, he cannot see the Kingdom of God." See also, Rom 1:18-20 which says that all are "without excuse." And, Rev. 19 says that at the Great White Throne judgment, the dead will be judged "according to their deeds" so those who have not heard the Gospel will be judged less severely than those who have heard and rejected it. | ||||||
5 | Cain and Abel wives. Who are they? | Genesis | danjg | 239345 | ||
Possibly, but reading the text, I get the impression it wasn't too long after he left the "presence of the Lord" that he took a wife! | ||||||
6 | Cain and Abel wives. Who are they? | Genesis | danjg | 239332 | ||
Cain would have to marry a sister! Adam and Eve had no siblings, so there wouldn't be any cousins, etc. | ||||||
7 | Knowing the Word | Jer 8:7 | danjg | 233241 | ||
"I have been trying to figure this one out for close to 47 years now, CDBJ" You're in good company..theologians have been trying to figure it out for millenia. For me, I believe in both because both are clearly taught in Scripture. Do I understand it? No! But then I don't understand the Trinity either, but I believe it! I illustrate it with railroads tracks..you need two to run your train on and they must stay parallel. Our theological train needs two tracks to run on: God's sovereignty and man's free will. Emphasize one over the other and you'll crash! If we had infinite knowledge like God, we'd have no problem with it. I leave it at that! |
||||||
8 | Knowing the Word | Jer 8:7 | danjg | 233240 | ||
Ooops, I meant in Luke 3:2, sorry! | ||||||
9 | Knowing the Word | Jer 8:7 | danjg | 233237 | ||
While I agree, I don't see the significance of your statement that not every word God has uttered "became scripture" (graphe), i.e. written down. Mt. 4:4 says that we are to live "on every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God." That has to refer to Scripture because the only words God has given us to live by are contained in Scripture, ergo, Sola Scriptura! Are you trying to make a distinction between the words of God the Father and Jesus and that the Father's are more important? Is there a significance between "word (rhema) of God" in Luke 2:2 and "word (logos)of God" in Luke 5:1? |
||||||
10 | Knowing the Word | Jer 8:7 | danjg | 233229 | ||
Yes, Sola Scriptura "is an invention of man" but only in the same sense as the Trinity! The word "Trinity" isn't found in Scripture, but the concept of one God manifest in three distinct persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, is! Sola Scriptura is a biblical concept that "man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from God." It also means that inspiration and inerrancy is only found in the Scriptures not in any work of man! | ||||||
11 | Did Jesus and early church drink wine? | 1 Cor 11:25 | danjg | 233086 | ||
God's Word gives us negative (you shall not) and positive (you shall)commands. Why both? In general, the negative commands are about issues that our sinful nature naturally wants to do, while the positive commands are about issues that our sinful nature doesn't naturally want to do. So it seems to me that if the use of alcoholic beverages was sinful, then there would be clear "you shall not" passages in Scripture, and since there are none, it seems reasonable that Jesus and the early church drank wine the same as everyone else. | ||||||
12 | What liquid was in the communion cup? | 1 Cor 11:25 | danjg | 233027 | ||
Isn't Deut 14:22-26 in the Bible? | ||||||
13 | What liquid was in the communion cup? | 1 Cor 11:25 | danjg | 233007 | ||
This issue is about like the KJV only debate that rages on! I grew up in a church where drinking any alcoholic beverage was a no-no! I accepted that position until I happened to read Deut 14:22-26! V.26 was the clincher! I have no doubt that Jesus and the early church drank fermented wine b/c "new wine" is used to designate fresh squeezed grapes, i.e. Jesus said you don't put "new wine into old wine skins" plus there's no prohibition of alcoholic beverages except for the Nazarite vow situation! | ||||||
14 | KJV Only Help | Bible general Archive 4 | danjg | 232965 | ||
I'm curious about your "G-d to G-ds" issue! First, in my NASB "gods" is never capitalized and is never used of JEHOVAH, but only of pagan "deities." Second, Gen 3:5 seems to contradict your contention: "For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil." KJV "For God know that in the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil." NASB It seems obvious that Satan was referring to God not gods b/c why would Adam and Eve know anything about "gods?" Maybe you're thinking of Daniel 3:25 where Nebuchadnezzar sees a fourth person in the fiery furnace as the "Son of God" (KJV) or "son of the gods" (NASB). The question is, as a pagan king, what would he know about the Son of God? But it's clear he understands that the 4th person is some type of deity, therefore, the latter translation seems best! |
||||||
15 | KJV Only Help | Bible general Archive 4 | danjg | 232964 | ||
I understand your frustration...I faced it too when I switched to the NASB back in the early 70s primarily b/c we didn't use King James English anymore! Also when I did my own translation from the Gk, if agreed more with NASB than KJV a majority of the time! When confronted by a KJV only person, I ask these questions: 1. Which version of the KJV is most "inspired" (if they claim that)or accurate; the 1611 or 1885? 2. If the Bible was first translated into English in 1911 instead of 1611, what Gk text would have been used, and would it be in King James English? 3. What doctrine is found in the KJV that is not found in my NASB? My reason for ? #1 is that the 1611 version contained the Aprocryphal books but were officially removed in 1885 by the Archbishop of Canterbury so any KJV Bible since then is not really a 1611 version. I've looked at many doctrinal statements by sound evangelical churches/organizations and have found that my NASB supports all their doctrinal beliefs! |
||||||
16 | Job's suffering | Job | danjg | 230902 | ||
Job 2:3 is the key verse here..and one that some totally ignore when discussing the believer/suffering scenario. God places three hedges around the believer: our possessions, health, and life; Great comfort comes from knowing Satan can't touch any of them w/o God allowing him to do so! | ||||||
17 | Church and addiction | Rom 10:8 | danjg | 230501 | ||
Read these Scriptures Romans 10:8-13 Acts 16:30-31 There's nothing about giving up anything to be saved. But, here's a question only you can answer: why do you want to be saved? Is it b/c you know you're a sinner and deserve eternal judgment, or you want help with your addiction? If your repentance is genuine and you place your trust is Christ alone, then not only will He save you, but He will help you with your addiction! |
||||||
18 | Obesity? | 1 Cor 6:19 | danjg | 228341 | ||
Let's change the situation to a person who's overweight but not clinically obese? Are they sinning? I'm not trying to nit-pic, I'm just trying to see where you draw the line and sin starts in your opinion. |
||||||
19 | Obesity? | 1 Cor 6:19 | danjg | 228313 | ||
Since obesity is not good for our bodies, would you consider an obese Christian to be living in sin? If the Holy Spirit uses that verse to convict you personally about some area in your life, OK. But to make this a blanket command to all believers about tattoos, or what we wear, etc. is, IMO, using exegetical gymnastics rather than "handling accurately the word of truth." (2 Tim 2:15) | ||||||
20 | regulation regarding tattooing | 1 Cor 6:19 | danjg | 228268 | ||
The context of this verse is immorality, so I'd be very cautious about using it as a blanket command for any other actions! | ||||||
Result pages: [ 1 2 ] Next > Last [2] >> |