Results 1 - 3 of 3
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | "nun" verse at Psalm 145:13 not in NASB | Bible general Archive 3 | roydjr18 | 164367 | ||
Why did the translators of the NASB choose not to include the "nun" verse between Psalm 145:13? | ||||||
2 | "nun" verse at Psalm 145:13 not in NASB | Bible general Archive 3 | Commandment keeper | 164618 | ||
Nasb is a dangerous translation. We are seeing many new translations now. Much corruption is creeping into these Bibles. A good basic translation is the Geneva Bible, whch was written long ago, and pretty much translates word for word. You would have to ask the editors of NASB why they add to the Bible. |
||||||
3 | "nun" verse at Psalm 145:13 not in NASB | Bible general Archive 3 | DocTrinsograce | 164641 | ||
Dear Commandmentkeeper, You are mixing issues of translation and textual criticism. Would you please be more specific: Where does the NASB introduce corruption and how do you define corruption? Where have editors "added to the Bible?" It isn't often that the forum draws participants with sufficient knowledge of the science of textual criticism or expertise in ancient Biblical languages to make these kinds of assertions. It is rare, indeed, to have someone with expertise in both disciplines. Welcome to the forum. In Him, Doc |
||||||