Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | complete return to biblical Christianity | Bible general Archive 1 | Reformer Joe | 62360 | ||
Consubstantiation is not the Roman Catholic view, nor was it the view of Calvin. The timing and nature of baptism is also a much more complex argument than you acknowledge it to be. The Reformers carried other "baggage" over from the RCC like the Trinity and the substitutionary death of Jesus Christ. Perhaps they should have abandoned those, too...? While I am certainly not Catholic, the Roman Catholic Church was/is not wrong on EVERYTHING. --Joe! |
||||||
2 | complete return to biblical Christianity | Bible general Archive 1 | srbaegon | 62364 | ||
Hello Joe Allow me to correct myself. RCC believed in transubstantiation. Certain reformers, knowing this to be invalid, yet being uncomfortable with the idea of the Lord's Supper being only a memorial feast, taught consubstantiation. I have read teaching on baptism that was rather complex (including both "paedobaptism" and "grace of baptism"). I'll admit they left me confused. I agree that the RCC is not wrong on everything. Steve |
||||||