Results 1 - 2 of 2
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | put 1Jn 5:7 BACK where it belongs! | 1 John 5:7 | justanotherchristian | 98547 | ||
Dear Hank and All..... PLEASE.... I have done my homework on this matter and on this verse. It is directly quoted in the early 4th century by some latin writer in Spain (cannot remember the name just now) -Polannasius? (Sp). It is alluded to in apparent inference a few times in the Pre-Nicene "Fathers" - and then, there is a peculiar dangling participle left hanging off the end of the shortened quote of verse 7 that does not match up properly with the beginning of verse 8. Can't you see what is happening here? THE WHOLE BIBLE's authenticity is called into doubt by such things as this. EVEN the Vulgate and the Douay (taken from the Vulgate) have this verse, intact. This verse was never seriously challenged until Westcott and Hort..... think of that.... I will be glad to receive person e-mail at jac@jacglobal.net you can visit our main web-site at www.apostasynow.com |
||||||
2 | put 1Jn 5:7 BACK where it belongs! | 1 John 5:7 | Hank | 98548 | ||
justanotherchristian - Do you seriously believe the Comma Johanneum poses a grave threat to the authenticity of all Scripture? I fail to see how it does. I can't agree with Riplinger about the conspiracy of "New Age" translators to pervert and emasculate Holy Writ. That's being rather too reactionary in my view. --Hank | ||||||