Results 1 - 6 of 6
|
|
|||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Ordered by Verse | ||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
1 | Did Jonah die in the belly of the fish? | Matt 12:40 | Jesusman | 192298 | ||
Something that might help clarify and edify what has already been said here. A former doctrine professor of mine had a newspaper clipping dated back in the 50's if memory serves, from a mediteranean newspaper that speaks of a fishing boat being tossed around and that a sailor fell overboard. He was swallowed by a whale, and believed dead. The fishing boat found the whale 4 days later and caught it. When they cut it open, they found their crew mate inside the whale still alive. His skin was very pale and sickly from the stomach acids eating away at his skin. It took him a few days to recover. This story gave credibility to the Book of Jonah that such an event really could have happened. |
||||||
2 | Did Jonah die in the belly of the fish? | Matt 12:40 | DocTrinsograce | 192306 | ||
Hi, Jesusman... You wrote, "This story gave credibility to the Book of Jonah that such an event really could have happened." You probably know this already... but... of course, God's word does not need external support to give it credence. As the old divines put it, "The authority of the Holy Scripture, for which it ought to be believed, dependeth not upon the testimony of any man or church, but wholly upon God (who is truth itself), the author thereof; therefore it is to be received because it is the Word of God. (2 Peter 1:19-21; 2 Timothy 3:16; 2 Thessalonians 2:13; 1 John 5:9)" (1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith, Chapter 1, Paragraph 4) In Him, Doc |
||||||
3 | Did Jonah die in the belly of the fish? | Matt 12:40 | Jesusman | 192308 | ||
No offense, Doc, but tell this to an athiest who believes that the Book of Jonah is a fairy tale then tell me the response. For a long time, the only credibility the Book of Jonah had to being true was the comments made by Jesus. The article I mentioned, plus a couple of archeological discoveries in recent decades sheds new light on the Book of Jonah. Need to remember, Doc, we aren't only to teach the saved but make disciples of the unsaved. To do that, you will need to prove that the Bible is trustworthy and credible. The Best way to do that is through it's Historical claims. The old excuse "cause I said so" ... or "cause God says so" doesn't work with everyone. Jesusman. |
||||||
4 | Did Jonah die in the belly of the fish? | Matt 12:40 | DocTrinsograce | 192310 | ||
Dear Jesusman, Fortunately, redemption is not a matter persuasion (John 10:26-27). Hence, we proclaim (kerouso) the gospel (Romans 10:14). We are never told to make the truth credible. Indeed, if we do not tell them the truth -- that the Scripture is the utterly authoritative Word of God -- should we expect evangelism to start with a lie? In Him, Doc |
||||||
5 | Did Jonah die in the belly of the fish? | Matt 12:40 | Jesusman | 192315 | ||
Again .. no offense, Doc, but the Bible isn't a Calvinist. We are still to teach and teach truthfully to the unsaved. If persuasion played no part, and that redemption is purely from God, then why are we commanded to teach the unsaved?The precident set by the Apostles and the Early church fathers are to support your claims with facts. Dr. Luke used Roman time tables and references in his writings so his readers can know he was speaking truth and not trying to blow sunshine up their noses. Paul applauded the Bereans for testing every word he said. Even Jesus referred to the Old Testament writings to support his then believed to be outrageous claims of being the Messiah. When it comes to speaking with a person who is unsaved and prolly hasn't darkened the doorway of a church except at funerals and weddings, then you can't approach them successfully the same way you do an elder of the church. Look at Paul's sermon on Mar's Hill. Did he pull out the Torah and speak to them about the Law? Did he throw a praise session together? No .. he used their own beliefs and idols to proclaim the message. He got onto their level without compromising his own. That is what I am talking about. By supporting my religious claims with something that can be researched, I am giving those who are unsaved the means and opportunity to find out for themselves that what I'm telling them is not a bunch of fairy tails or good luck sayings. Jesusman |
||||||
6 | Did Jonah die in the belly of the fish? | Matt 12:40 | DocTrinsograce | 192397 | ||
Dear Jesusman, You appear to be implying that "redemption is purely from God" is entirely a Calvinist doctrine. There's a lot of confusion about theology these days, and not much efforts in our churches to correct it. John Wesley, one of the more prominent proponents of Arminian theology wrote, "It [redemptive grace] does not depend on any power or merit in man; no, not in any degree, neither in whole, nor in part. It does not in anywise depend either on the good works or righteousness of the receiver; not on anything he has done, or anything he is. It does not depend on his endeavors. It does not depend on his good tempers, or good desires, or good purposes and intentions... Whatsoever good is in man, or is done by man, God is the author and doer of it." You wrote, "Look at Paul's sermon on Mar's Hill. ... He got onto their level without compromising his own." (sic) I'm glad you brought that up. It is an excellent case in point. Let's exegete it together. (Acts 17:22-31) Actually, Paul uses a point of connection, he does not leverage their own thinking to validate the truth. Note that he asserts and affirms that they don't know who they are worshiping (v23). Then he identifies God as the creator who -- fully contradicting their own theology -- does not live in temples (v24), nor does He need anything from His creation (v25), nor does He draw His existence from anything (26a). Indeed, all creation is foreordained, bounded (v27), and dependent on Him (v28). Paul continues to contradict their thinking by asserting that God cannot be compassed by man's creative powers or cognition (v29). Consequently, this God which was utterly contrary to the thinking of the Athenians, has the full authority as creator to judge their foolishness and ignorance (v30), and to command them to repent of such things -- showing the same logic of Romans 1 that it is a moral matter rather than a matter of persuasion. Further, that God's judgment was imminent through Christ (v31a). Finally, that this was all proven by the resurrection of Christ (v31b). Do you see how it was proven? By the resurrection of Christ to which thing Paul testifies. He does not say, "It is proven by your own beliefs." Paul uses their error as a starting point to rebuke and correct them -- which is precisely what we are told that Word of God is for (2 Timothy 3:16-17). (And, yes, Paul can make all these assertions about the attributes of God because God has formerly revealed them... in the Word! (Hebrews 1:1-2)) You asked, "...why are we commanded to teach the unsaved?" (sic) Correction: We are not to simply teach. Lost people are not simply in need of a tutor; nor are they sick, in need of a doctor; but the Scripture says the lost are dead in their sins (Ephesians 2:1, 5; Colossians 2:13; 1 Peter 2:24)... therefore they need a miracle! Anyway, to answer your question, God has ordained preaching as the means by which grace is bestowed on men. Please read 1 Corinthians 1:21-29. God has specifically chosen "the foolishness of preaching to save believers" (v21). Frankly, son, I'd rather use the ordained means of God for reaching the lost, than to try to leverage their own failed, vain, and deceitful philosophies (Colossians 2:8). All redeemed people are persuaded people. All persuaded people are not redeemed people (Matthew 13:20-21, 38). In Him, Doc |
||||||