Prior Book | Prior Chapter | Prior Verse | Next Verse | Next Chapter | Next Book | Viewing NASB and Amplified 2015 | |
NASB | Colossians 2:16 ¶ Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day-- |
AMPLIFIED 2015 | Colossians 2:16 ¶ Therefore let no one judge you in regard to food and drink or in regard to [the observance of] a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day. |
Subject: Correcting the translation |
Bible Note: Well Ed, let's see how well you analyze things: "I have learned from you: You have a web site!" Yeah, one right! "You rather proud of your education." I have never said such a thing; see Hosea 4:6. "You are rather impressed with you scholarship." Nope, two wrong! "The leading and foremost Bible translators are either wrong, mistaken, mislead or conspiring to create a deception as to the day of worship." Never said such a thing; three wrong. "Most if not all commentators either do a half baked job or simply use what was previously written on the subject." The amateur commentators do it in part. Note the number of lexical sources I use that contradict some of the commentators I do cite. Where the writers of the lexicons wrong? Am I wrong in noting what they say? Am I wrong in simply pointing out that some commentators are wrong? "Most Bible scholars of today are either wrong, mistaken, mislead or conspiring to create a deception about which day we as Christians should worship." Never said that either, four wrong. Try reading the full study; perhaps you are trying to read too much into the litle posts here. "Most Christian denominations are wrong, mistaken, mislead or conspiring to create a deception on what day to worship." Since we never even talked about various denominations this is really a totally mis-read. "Most “scholars” question the veracity of date the Bible implies as to when Daniel was written." See the study on the date of the book of Daniel; there are very many well-known scholars who say that the book was written in about 164 B.C.. "However my own experience shows most genuine theologians now agree Daniel was written at the time of Daniel’s experiences." "genuine"? How do you determine who is and who isn't? "Most theologians do not understand Greek as well as you." Never said that--five wrong. "Most theologians must stand in the shadow of the your 195 references." Nope, never said that either--six wrong. "Most theologians must stand in the shadow of you two years of your studying the meaning of Col. 2:16." Nope, never said that either--seven wrong. "That you can not or will not verbalize what it is you believe." I did, repeatedly: Col. 2:16-17 isn't talking about the seventh-day Sabbath. Anything about that is irrelevant as in I do not believe in child baptism, I do believe in the Trinty--now are you happy? "Nor will you reveal your religious affiliation." Who cares? How about: Reformed Druid? "You have a Web site." Repeat from above. Now, since we now know that you read way too much into stuff why don't you actually try reading the full study? |