☰ Menu
bible.lockman.org  Home | Search
 
  • Lockman.org
  • About Us

    • About
    • Who we are
    • History
    • Who is Jesus?
    •  
  • Shop / Catalog

    • Digital
    • NASB 2020
    • NASB 1995
    • NASB 1977
    • Amplified
    • NBLA (Spanish)
    • LBLA (Spanish)
    •  
  • NASB

    • NASB
    • Amplified
    • LBLA
    • NBLA
    • Permissions
    •  
Click Here
Bibles by the Case, with free shipping
All New NASB 2020 - 44% off
Save 40% or more on Bibles now! Limited quantities

Questions, answers, or notes on a Bible verse:
(i.e. Gen 1:1)
Read the Bible:
Book Chap:verse
New Window
Translation: Search Range: Search word(s):


Search for your Bible question and answer here:


Deuteronomy

SCROLL TO BOTTOM FOR CONTENT THREADS.
Prior Book | Prior Chapter | Prior Verse | Next Verse | Next Chapter | Next Book | Viewing NASB and Amplified 2015
NASB Deuteronomy 19:21 "Thus you shall not show pity: life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.
AMPLIFIED 2015 Deuteronomy 19:21 "You shall not show pity [to the guilty one]: it shall be life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.
SCROLL TO BOTTOM FOR CONTENT THREADS.
Subject:  Harmonizing the Word Hermeneutically

Bible Note:  Dear Ed,

Demand? Oh ho... do you think I have such authority? I just want to minimize the amount of reading I need to do (per #243147). Surely somebody thought it fitting to explain it all in a single volume.

I just noticed that no two Dispensationalists agreed on the same doctrine. What I have learned from you is that there is another kind of Dispensationalism of those who disavow Dispensationalism in general. Instead of minimizing the amount of reading, now if I am to understand, I must read even MORE and varied positions. The amount of effort to understand this document increases exponentially.

Your questions regarding the Reformation are out there to uncover as you wish. None of these things were done in a corner. Just as my efforts to understand Dispensationalism will require further attention. We who do not comprehend these doctrines have little authority to comment on them.

To summarize my confusion, it involves the Pentecostal embracing of Dispensationalism, while rejecting or accepting en toto, the teaching of Dispensationalists through history. A rose by any other name, you know?

I have a couple other AOG professors I can ask. Thus, I will seek the answers elsewhere with those who are apt to teach.

Sorry for bothering you with questions of your Non-Dispensational doctrines expressed in the context of Dispensationalism.

In Him, Doc

PS You continue to want to talk about Reformed perceptions... Seems odd that a Pentecostal wants to know about Reformed Theology. Please start your questions on another thread. Branching off topic would confuse everyone. In another thread, I'll be happy to answer any questions that you might have.

PSS I got an answer from one of my AOG pastor friends. He writes, "Standard A/G doctrine IS dispensational, pre-tribulational and pre-millenial. PERIOD." (sic) He further tells me that there are dissenters among those ordained as AOG pastors.

Another one says, "Smile and nod. Just take his name to prayer and hold forth a hand of friendship with a view to hopeful fellowship."

These statements have confirmed my growing suspicions that Dispensationalism is a moving target. Reformed theology had that problem at one time. It took a hundred years to iron it out. It looks like it will take more than two hundred years for Dispensationalists to arrive at agreement.

  Up   |    Down     View Branch    ID# 243170  
 Questions and/or Subjects for Deut 19:21   Author 
 Harmonizing the Word Hermeneutically
  DocTrinsograce
 Using Ex 21:24 and Matthew 5:39 as suppo...
  EdB
 This might help as a definition. I canno...
  DocTrinsograce
 Is a confessionalized definition proof o...
  EdB
 Dear Ed, The more I read on Dispensat...
  DocTrinsograce
 Dispensationalism is an understanding of...
  EdB
 Dear Ed, Do I understand correctly th...
  DocTrinsograce
 I don't think I said they were right or...
  EdB
 Dear Ed, I recall one of my seminary ...
  DocTrinsograce
 First I'm not a "dispensationalist" s...
  EdB
 Dear Ed, Demand? Oh ho... do you thin...
  DocTrinsograce
 Again having taught in both AG ministeri...
  EdB
 Dear Ed, Good clarifications there! ...
  DocTrinsograce
 First let me say I felt no attack and I ...
  EdB
 Dear Ed, The doctrine you have abjure...
  DocTrinsograce
 First I don't suggest that only elite g...
  EdB
 Meh (I love that word that the kids came...
  DocTrinsograce
 The beef in this discussion is Reformed ...
  EdB
 No, the beef would be some solid Scriptu...
  DocTrinsograce
 What opinion. The fact that denomination...
  EdB
 Oy vey iz mere. Scriptures on your as...
  DocTrinsograce
 Already did :-)
  EdB
 "Give yourself unto reading. The man wh...
  DocTrinsograce




bible.lockman.org
Answered Bible Questions
Primary Bible Questions (?)
Bible verses
About StudyBibleForum.com

The Lockman Foundation did not screen Postings. Postings are the opinions of others and may or may not represent a commonly held view.

StudyBibleForum.com Copyright © The Lockman Foundation 2001-2016
Permission to quote guidelines.