Prior Book | Prior Chapter | Prior Verse | Next Verse | Next Chapter | Next Book | Viewing NASB and Amplified 2015 | |
NASB | Leviticus 18:22 'You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination. |
AMPLIFIED 2015 | Leviticus 18:22 'You shall not lie [intimately] with a male as one lies with a female; it is repulsive. [1 Cor 6:9, 10] |
Bible Question:
To all the scholars out there, hungry for the TRUTH about the Word of God...I pose this question (maybe you can help me.) In my first Bible class at a Christian University, we were instructed to see the Bible as a literary work instead of from a faith perspective, by the view of only the "proven facts". I propose that to understand any religious writings, practices, or belief systems, a true student must: if not accept it for themselves, then accept it from the unique perspective / viewpoint of the follower, the founder, or the author of the faith-based text. For example: I read an account of a man who went to China on a trip and was fascinated by Zen Buddism. He had an encounter with a religious order of monks that had mastered target archery. The queer thing about their mastery of this sport was that they neither aimed nor had their eyes open when they fired the arrow. The man tried desperately to accomplish this same semi-miraculous task. Once he asked one of the more approachable monks how they were able to do this and he replied, " We don't have to think about it, it comes naturally." The man did not understand and puzzled asked him to clarify so the monk replied, "To know (Zen Buddism) is to experience it, you must find it before it will be clear." So the man forgot about everything and studied under this monk for more than twenty years. This went on until he was able to connect the arrow in the exact center of the bulls-eye without aiming without looking, without thinking about it, just as he had seen the monks do on his first visit. The primary point of that story is: to understand religious beliefs should we not view them from the perspective (while maintaining our skepticism) of the race or group of those who have this faith system. I propose that studying a faith without maintaining a bias or viewpoint (particularly the original one of the belief) is ineffective and leads only to universal facts. Another example would be: In study of the Hebrew scriptures, Take out the statements accepted only because of faith (ie... that YHVH delivered the nation of Israel out of slavery, Noah actually took 2 [and in some cases 14] of every animal on a huge boat built when he was 600, etc) and all you have is blunt fact, which is rarely definitive of the faith (religion) as a whole. Such things include: laws (The fact that they were written, not that they were Divinely commanded), earliest recorded history (ie: locations, existence of a race, etc, and scientific-based, geographically sound, historical events or people. I argue that in studying the Bible, it is the same way. When a statement of faith was inserted in the original manuscript, it was for a purpose, not to be discarded as a perspective but as a way of explaining that which human minds can not understand (for as a species we have much yet to learn) in terms they can accept and derive wisdom and discernment from. My challenge is that we'd look past our personal biases and attain the point of view of the believer that it is clear why a text says a particular thing, or reveals only part of need to know information. Many times the "need to know " information is acquired by accepting the 'givens' that faith in a faith-based text provides. So my question is: Does the extensive study of a particular belief (either foreign to or accepted by the student) require all biases to be stripped away, or does a better understanding of the believing party's viewpoint become essential? Is there a middle ground? And if so, to what extent should a student have bias for, or remain critical of, the concerned viewpoint? --Please send your relevant personal opinions, findings, and discussions to LghtWyTrth@apu.edu |
Bible Answer: What you are saying might hold true with other studies but when it comes to the study of the Bible there is a different concept that the Bible conveys. The problem being that seeing, is not believing, but believing, which is PISTIS or faith in the original Greek, is seeing. It is impossible to know the real truth that the the Bible teaches with out faith! The Bible is a supernatural book, that the natural man can’t understand. 1 Cor. 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. Christianity per se, is not a religion but a relationship. Religion is man by man's best efforts trying to gain the approbation of God. Christianity on the other hand is God doing all the work and man can only receive what God has done for him as a gift; it is non meritorious, we can’t work for it and we sure don’t deserve it, but God demands that we believe it or He will not reveal the truth that is contained within His precious word, namely the facts about his Son. Matthew 16:16-17 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. [17] And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. Hebrews 11:6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Sad to say not all are in the family of God, one must be born into God’s family before they can perceive God’s kingdom. Once a person becomes a child of God the Bible literally comes alive with meaning and understanding. This is not my personal opinion but has been my personal experience alone with thousands of others. John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. I hope this helps, CDBJ |