Results 541 - 553 of 553
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: Tamara Brewington Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
541 | Define wine, please? | Rev 17:2 | Tamara Brewington | 204281 | ||
Wow, you blew me right away, hope I can learn from you someday. Tam | ||||||
542 | Define wine, please? | Rev 17:2 | Tamara Brewington | 204302 | ||
Dear Tim, I am intrigued... Pray tell, which recources.. Like an idiot I glanced at the concordance and did not look closely enough to see that there was more than the most prominent number for wine... If you were using another resource, pray do tell what it was, I love to collect and use new Bible tools in my endeavor to be learning more. I haven't had the time until today but I am definitely going to go to your stats and spend the time to learn a few new things... God Bless, Tamara |
||||||
543 | Define wine, please? | Rev 17:2 | Tamara Brewington | 204305 | ||
Oh Yeah geez louise... My Pastor is another one... My Pastor made me go take Greek, said, you are ready go do it... My school has a couple prerequisites, had to take Greek Foundations 1,2, before taking NT Greek, haven't taken the NT yet... That stuff is no joke, believe me the demons come out when you go to learn this stuff, they do not want anyone to learn the truth! I am terrible at it though, it is very, very difficult to learn to read a language in different letters... I am in awe of folks that have deicated their lives to learning the original languages, it makes a great big difference when it comes to expository preaching and teaching, sure does... I told my Pastor about this site in the hopes he might find the time while on vacation this summer to teach on line, there is another gem set in pure gold, God blessed our church while we were searching for a pastor. I was glad and surprised when Pastor Moran put his title in his stats and his email too... I Timothy 3:16,17 God Bless the hat lady... |
||||||
544 | Define wine, please? | Rev 17:2 | Tamara Brewington | 204313 | ||
I heartily agree Lionheart! Do you have the scriptureanalyzer4all? It has the original language word order for Greek and English with lexical components... You probably know of the esword and www.esword.net and have that. But do you have the legitimate modules for it that are not on their home page site? If you want, email me at whatdoyoubelieve@hotmail.com and I will send you three links... Oh wanna laugh? I rushed out the house this morning after leaving you a note saying I was late for first Sunday... Stupid git, went flying down the street in a white hat and suit for communion and was the only one wearing white in church!... OH MY Gosh, I was wilting all through service pondering seriously about externals............. Then it was time to usher and I felt stupid in white because the other usher was wearing black and had to remind myself I was serving the Lord, not there for a fashion show. Laugh out Loud.................... God Bless, the hat lady |
||||||
545 | Define wine, please? | Rev 17:2 | Tamara Brewington | 204314 | ||
Whatever you want to do about curtailing a discussion is fine, I won't bother to answer you then about it then... You ain't too interested in a rebuttal I can tell. I appreciate your insight, how's that? I do have to disagree with you though, I think it is important to have free discourse about Biblical concepts, doctrines and so on based on the scriptures and our intrepretation of them. But I respect your right to cut short any further discourse just the same.. Maybe next time if you don't want think it is profitable to discuss something further you could refrain form asking questions while at the same time saying let's let it go (we understand what a rhetorical question is..., but asking one and then saying let's not get into it may have an unintended barb in it somewhere). God bless, Tamara |
||||||
546 | Define wine, please? | Rev 17:2 | Tamara Brewington | 204332 | ||
ok | ||||||
547 | Define wine, please? | Rev 17:2 | Tamara Brewington | 204333 | ||
I think the feather ruffling is all me actually, maybe if I had left out the word ain't it wouldn't have seemed sarcastic, which was not the intent. The intent was resignation to your request and I think I was being sassy because I love to study a subject and just get to chewin on it. Seems like you guys have chewed up sooooo much stuff in here that its all good to you to stop jawing about a thing, I understand. I have not been around long enough in here or out there to have discussed any subject add nauseum to be ready to drop and go, every darn thing is sooooooo interesting to me.... That is what happens to new jacks. I will try to take note though of when Sola Scriputa cannot be applied to straighten something out... Soorrrrrrryyyyyyyyy Back, God bless, the hat lady |
||||||
548 | Define wine, please? | Rev 17:2 | Tamara Brewington | 204336 | ||
yep | ||||||
549 | Define wine, please? | Rev 17:2 | Tamara Brewington | 204390 | ||
Say thanks Pastor Moran! So, Question, does the word wine that Paul uses in I Corinthians 11 refer to fermented or unfermented wine and do you believe based on the context of that part of his letter that the Corinthians were dying early because of getting drunk at the supper, or was that becuase they did not examine themselves? God Bless, the hat lady |
||||||
550 | Define wine, please? | Rev 17:2 | Tamara Brewington | 204399 | ||
Dear Lionheart, I have been reading Colossians now for a few days and am wondering if you took my reply the first time to read when I said OK to mean I was offended, or being short with you. That was not the intent, I was trying to let it go Lionheart, not be short tempered. 1)keep seeking that which is above. still doing this. 2)put aside all anger, malice, wrath, abusive speech, slander. was never angry just disapointed and dismayed and did not use abusive speech nor slander anyone. 3)put on compassion, kindess, humility, gentleness, patience, bearing with one another, forgive one another. I did stumble a bit there, but examined myself and tried to the best of my ability to come around to the right veiw of things with all of your help. Why am I seen as not having come around yet? Open to further instruction from you on this... 4)whatever you do, do your work heartily giving thanks to God, fearing the Lord. this is why I am here and continue to participate. Is there somethig you see that I am doing that I need to be corrected about? I am open, feel free to be specific please... I sent something to John as he felt it necessary to enlighten me for the second or third time about what he calls speculation. I replied that all areas of Bible study are ultimatel about Christ and the final message of the Bible. I am interested in all the various facets of how that message progressed, the players and the stage, the authors intent, their audiences, how they differently treat the same subject, as well as every thing that the Bible has to say about all of its aspects and information. There is no part of what the Bible says about anything that is not profitable to study. You said yourself that II Timothy 2:15 was a very important point.It takes every aspect of exegesis to do that, the critical forms; redaction, literary, textual, grammatical and others are all part of the process. Not everything is self explanatory without using the different parts to arrive at a clear picture of seemingly differing accounts, use of words, or scriptures. If we have moved beyond the elementary things then the central message qualifies as an elementay thing as is laying on of hands and some very complicated areas of theological study that Hebrews mentions in that scripture. Some of the things mentioned there are being milk are pretty deep. I think according to the qualifications, we are all somewhere in between milk and meat. We see washings laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, repentance of dead works, eternal judgments. Two of those things are not simple doctrines or teachings. After receiving some messages that something should be dropped, to one of which I replied, I can see that you are not interested in a rebuttal, which is a straight forward observation and not an attack, or an insult or slander, others have chosen to discuss the original matter some more and do not agree with that view, that it should be dropped. I think as I tried to point out to John that there is room for diversity in the body of Christ and that people view things from their own theological lens. I don't think subject matter itself, as long as it is about something in the Bible, is necessarily frivolous material. And I don't think that we should all just be requried to view an aspect of studying a subject according the the rules of exegesis as speculation. There are others here who would agree on this. I am more than willing to stop exploring a matter with someone who does not see the point, that does not mean there is no point, just that there is not one to them. I think it is fair to say that my shorter replies left you all wondering if I was harboring ill will, I was only trying to drop it, not insult. Forgive me won't you? God Bless, the hat lady |
||||||
551 | Why are they future. | Rev 17:10 | Tamara Brewington | 204207 | ||
Is this in response to something? Or is this an original question? The verse is there for us to see what you are looking at to base your question on, but what do you mean by, "they are out of the future, when none of the others are', is not clear. Did you mean that now in the present the five kings have fallen, as if somehow any part of Revelation has happened yet? Or did you mean that it is not possible for the five kings to have fallen in the future when Revelation will come to pass as the text says before the one that is there functioning and the one that will come because of something else you see in another passage of Revelation? If it is the first case, then the answer would be none of Revelation has happened yet except chapters 2,3, only wars and rumors... If it is the second case then could you please be mnore specific about where else in Revelation you are seeing that, none of the the others are out of the future? This is why we are supposed to not use brevity, so others can see the total context of the question in order to try to answer it. But of course this may have been a note to someone, in which case remember to choose note so that it doesn't appear as a post. God, Bless, Tamara |
||||||
552 | Horn means king? Hour is 60 minutes? | Rev 17:12 | Tamara Brewington | 204079 | ||
I missed this one when I was answering you the other day... This one is ineed referring to a period of time longer than an hour, there are probably a few more like this in Revelation that I inadvertantly missed. I think when it comes to weeks and years in Revelation you can take that at face value. But where Revelation says in one chapter that something take a specific amount of time and then in another gives a hour we should take that to mean for a while, but look back to the other references in Revelation for specific weeks and years. This is because Revelation has a tendency to repeat itself, first it will describe something before it supposedly hapens and then it has a tendecy to take you to a place where it is supposedly actual taking place. God bless, Tamara | ||||||
553 | False Prophet? | Rev 20:10 | Tamara Brewington | 204436 | ||
Ok Here goes Thomas 8, 1)We have in Daniel the another description that can be found in the Bible of the Abomination of Desolation in Daniel 9:26-27, 11:30,31, 12:11. 2)The False Prophet in Revelation 13:11-15 is described as speaking like Satan, excersing the same authority as the Anti-Christ to make people worship the Anti-Christ. The False Prophet performs great signs making fire come out of heaven to decieve men and then down in verses 14 and 15 he makes an image of the Anti-Christ and makes it speak for real. This said to be the Abmoniation of Desolation found in Daniel according to some commentators. 3)Jesus speaks of the Abomination of Desolation in Mathew 24:15. 4)The False Prophet is specifcially mentioned in Revelation 13:11-14, 16:13, 19:20. Daniel is talking about the same things as Revelation in Daniel chapter 8. See Daniel 8:9-11 some commentators see this as the Ant-Christ and some see this as the False Prophet. 5)There are no direct references to the False Prophet in the OT. Only allussions that could be attributable to him. His deeds that can be tied into what Revelation directly tells us about him. We can't know for sure whether Daniel meant the Ant-Christ or the False Prophet. 6)Verses from the OT about false prophets; Deuteronomy 18:20-22,13:1-5, Isaiah 8:20, Jeremiah 14:14-16. 7)Verses from the NT about false prophets; Mathew 7:15-23, Mathew 24:11,24,II Peter 2:1-3, Mark 13:22, II Corinthians 11:3,4,13-15, I John 4:1-3. Consider these passages which allude to those who are false prophets; II Timothy 3:1-9, I Timothy 1:3-4, II Thessalonians 2:2-12, II John 1:7-11, I John 2:18-19, I Timothy 1:19,20, II Timothy 2:17,18. 8)Make a mental note of Mathew 7:21-23. All over the place in the NT where there are scriptures alluding to people who ostensibly did the works of Christ in one way or another, but failed to live the life that Christ proscribes have made a false confesion of Christ. The Bible has two different names for such people, Apostates who first adhered to the faith but have left the faith and False Prophets who either made a false profession of faith or who made true (see Deuteronomy 13:1-5) or false prophesies in order to get people to follow another god. I couldn't find anything else but there is probably more in there. God Bless, Tamara |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ] |