Results 41 - 56 of 56
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Answers, Unanswered Bible Questions, Notes Author: KBurgee Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
41 | 1Corinthians questions: Gifts and women | 1 Corinthians | KBurgee | 3906 | ||
Thanx for your words, rextar. They are very much appreciated. Let me explain tho: I did not wish to single out those of Pentecostal faith as those who I wanted to answer this question; rather, the churches that my experiences have brought me to where I have seen the most glaring misuse of speaking in tongues (ie, without an interpreter in front of the church) have been in Pentecostal churches. I'm not saying that all PC churches are like that, my experience has told me otherwise. Being of Episcopal and then Baptist faith (on a side note, all of these denominations stink; someone asks me "What denomination are you?" and I gotta answer, "God's kind", but that's another issue for another time), I have not really heard people speak in tongues in my church. I do believe that it is a gift from God and it should be used to glorify the church, but what good does it do if it's not used in a way that creates confusion? My experience has brought me to this particular church, where the pastor even went as far as somewhat downing a group of people who did not understand the rules of speaking in tongues; it was man fabricated and they were only speaking gibberish. | ||||||
42 | 1Corinthians questions: Gifts and women | 1 Corinthians | KBurgee | 3932 | ||
I agree that focusing on Jesus should be our main concern, but we cannot just ignore the effects of spiritual gifts to the glory of God and the edification of the church. Speaking in tongues is designed for unbelievers. What better way to get your message across that our God is an awesome God than to communicate it in someone else's language? Tongues is a gift, true, and it can and has been misused, agreed, but what about the men who spoke in tongues in Acts 2:1-11? Is that not true? They were accused of being drunk. The people who they were speaking weren't ready or willing at that time to accept God. Gifts of God - no matter what they are - should be used to glorify Him, and should not be taken lightly. It's the fact that I've seen some people take it lightly that discourages me. The spirit of the Lord will do what it will. People have been brought closer to God - saved or otherwise - through speaking, through prophesy, through spiritual gifts. Our concern, our focus, our LIFE is Jesus, but shouldn't our duty as Christians be to extend to others who are fast tracking it to Hell? What would be the point of showing our light? Like I stated, not all spiritual gifts are for us. They are for the edification of the body of Christ, which is the church. I'd like to know what these books are that you have read about tongues. |
||||||
43 | 1Corinthians questions: Gifts and women | 1 Corinthians | KBurgee | 4003 | ||
I've read your posting back and forth (thanx for the correction of "Him" and not "it", oversight on my part). Also, my capitalization of life was not scripture based; I was trying to get a sense of urgency across that Jesus should be the focus of our life. Anyway, from what I've encountered (and please remember, my witnessing of tongues is shaky at best), the people I've come across believe that they are filled with the Holy Spirit when they are speaking another language foreign to them; however, the desire (and the ability) to speak in tongues must not be confused with wanting to "leap out" and try to "create" a conversation with God in front of a congregation, using emotion as the engine (one way that tongues are misused; example of five people in a circle speaking gibberish to each other with no translator, breaking the law of verse 27). When speaking in tongues in public, edification of the church is important. Your point about our spirit praying is also reiterated later in verse 14. As far as tongues are concerned, though, 1 Corinthians 2:4 states: "He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself; but he that prophesieth edifieth the church". Also, I don't know what the men in Acts 2 said, but for them to be able to speak a language coherantly without ever hearing it or being subject to it before is a sign of the power of the Holy Spirit. Even then they were inclined to believe that the speakers were drunk rather than filled with the Holy Spirit. Peter then revealed to them what was true: about Jesus' death and resurrection. Maybe Peter was translating what was being said? (Not sure, help is appreciated) In Acts 4:31, my versions have Holy Spirit capitalized (specifically the KJV), and it mentions that they spoke boldly, in the same manner that Peter had spoken to the high ranking officials earlier (Acts 4:8). The Holy Spirit makes normal (and every other) man do things that are beyond our comprehension. The men in Acts 2 speaking in the languages of the unbelievers. Peter boldly standing up (without a formal education, Acts 4:13) and defying officials. Timid Jeremiah. The list goes on. Right now I may not fully believe that speaking in tongues is real (having seen it abused), but knowing what the Spirit can do, I'm inclined to believe it, and pray that I can fully believe it. Don't get it twisted, tho: I do agree with just about everything that you've pointed out, and your statements have given me a greater hunger to read up and make sure I try not to respond with foolishness, so I thank you for that. Hopefully my response does not stir up any ill feelings (and it shouldn't, cuz we're all in the same race). |
||||||
44 | Speaking in tongues? | 1 Corinthians | KBurgee | 75887 | ||
Bob and retxar, I've enjoyed your conversations on this subject. Kimmy, I can see the reason why your teacher said that, but what was the meaning behind it? Can everyone speak in tongues? Privately, towards God in prayer, because this language is a language you will not understand. Publically? Paul says that the gift of tongues is for unbelievers to believe (specifically what happened in Acts 2) in that they know who the Lord is and how awesome He is. I've been torn about this subject for some time now, seeing uneducated people sprout gibberish and passing it off as speaking in tongues...during a church service. Paul specifically warns against that, saying that there should be someone there to interpret for the edification of the church. Without that interpretation for the congregation, it's wrong and it's very disruptive. I knew a preacher who spent an entire church service about this subject, going on about the wrong ways and how people were incorrect in speaking tongues (five people in a circle speaking loudly is what I would consider "incorrect") and then he proceeded to speak in tongues at the end of the service, without an interpreter. Was he speaking Old English Greek? Probably, but I don't think he knew what he was speaking. Anyway, if he was speaking in tongues, he couldn't interpret for himself (no man can, actually, which is the point of the interpreter) and it was just nonsense, like a clashing symbol. Not everyone has the gift of tongues, and to say said person isn't filled with the Holy Spirit blatently denies all of the other times in Acts alone that the apostles were filled with the Spirit and performed miricles, while speaking the same language (Acts 4, for example). |
||||||
45 | Speaking in tongues? | 1 Corinthians | KBurgee | 75903 | ||
What's up gracefull, and thanks for responding. When I say the uneducated sprouting gibberish, I'm not attacking the Word of God. I'm saying that the speaking of tongues, in some cases, can be forced. I'll explain: I've seen what the original poster is talking about, as far as saying that if you don't speak in tongues, you're not Holy Spirit-filled. One particular case involved that same circle of people I hinted at before, speaking in a language that was foreign to them, responding to each other in that same language, almost snapping back and forth at each other to elicit a response. I'm not attacking the Holy Spirit; I'd be foolish to do that, and that's not what I'm talking about. Rather, I'm saying that the conditions for speaking in tongues outlined in 1 Corinthians were not met, and the result was detrimental to the edification of the church and was just noise. When the pastor spends much time pointing out the guidelines and pointing out how people are wrong, and proceeds to do the exact same thing he lambasted people for, outside of the requirements set forth by the Lord (and to a much lesser degree, himself), it's strange. I do believe you when you say in certain circumstances an interpreter may not step up to the plate. But I also believe that the Holy Spirit is orderly, and does not and can not do anything to the detriment of the church. When I also say uneducated, I mean in terms of the Bible. Maybe uneducated is a bit of a strong word (I'll agree to use immature), because I've seen it happen consistenly with some educated people. It's one thing to sit in service, have the Holy Spirit fill within you, and be able to speak in tongues (with interpretation). It's quite another when the purpose of speaking and shouting these tongues aloud is not for the edification of the church, but because someone has told you that if you don't speak in tongues then you're not "Spirit filled". In these cases, people try to force the gift that may not even be present in that person, moreso edifying the gifts than edifying the Giver. My post wasn't meant to be mean spirited or rude. But I've seen people attempt to force it out of people for "their own sakes". It's one thing if the Lord reveals to a pastor or someone that a specific person has the gift and needs to be encouraged a bit to use it, in prayer and for the edification of the church. And it's another when it comes down to "well, you don't have that gift so I'm A)better than you and B)I'm more Spirit filled than you". Gracefull, I'm interested to know - when you spoke, did you speak in public? Or privately? I'm not trying to be sarcastic or anything. |
||||||
46 | Speaking in tongues? | 1 Corinthians | KBurgee | 76003 | ||
Hey gracefull, thanks for the reply. I know prayer language is different from the language that needs to be intepreted for the edification of the church (since the prayer language is a language that only God can understand), but some people's spiritual immaturity (or misguidance) takes them outside of the box, so to say. I'm not bashing anyone here or trying to take a "holier-than-thou" attitude. I know that all of us, including yours truly, are spiritually immature in a lot of ways. My problem just comes from the school of thought that we NEED to be able to publically speak in tongues to consider ourselves Spirit filled, or even saved (now, THAT'S another discussion that I'd like to share with you). I'm very interested in knowing about your experience. Check out my profile. I hope to hear from you soon. | ||||||
47 | What is wrong w/Women speaking in church | 1 Cor 14:34 | KBurgee | 75884 | ||
Yes, I know what you're talking about. It's referenced in 1 Corinthians 14: 34-35 where Paul says that women should keep silent in church. It's not right to compare Jezebel (who was actively against God) to a woman who speaks in church. I think that comparison is extreme, although in some way I can see his point (I'll explain in a second). Paul's statement (from what I understand) was because back then, women weren't educated, and their questions would interrupt and thus disrupt a service. He wanted women to keep silent and any questions they had could be asked outside of the service to their husbands. I guess the pastor's comparison comes from disrupting God's work (either it be a service to worship Him or to try to deny Him worship completely), but God has used women to do His works. I hope this helps - I myself am eager as well to learn more. |
||||||
48 | Are Catholics saved because of religion? | Eph 2:8 | KBurgee | 3549 | ||
I don't want to seem like I'm bashing Catholics (although I DO have some fundamental differences of opinion with them, but that's neither here nor there), but I believe (cuz the Bible tells me so, hehe) that if you confess with your mouth and believe in your heart that Jesus is Lord, then you too shall be saved. There's no limit to who it is that can (or can't) be saved; that's why Jesus died, to bring salvation to ALL. My thinking (sorry if I'm stating the obvious, but who is it obvious to?) is that if your "religion" is based more on outwardly actions and not totally on the Lord, then it's hollow to begin with. That was the main point that Jesus made to the Pharisees. (I think "religion" is man's way of having his cake and eating it too, but that's just one friendly neighborhood gospel bassist's opinion) Being religious does not automatically make you saved; knowing Jesus does. From beginning to know Jesus, you start to have a personal relationship with him. You can't avoid it; it carries you on your worst days, best days and all days in between. Hope I wasn't too long winded :-) |
||||||
49 | Sabbath because it is a rule? | Col 2:16 | KBurgee | 2601 | ||
Que? (That means 'what' in Spanish, I think) Where does it say we don't still have to keep the 10 Commandments? From what I've seen, yes, Christ's death and resurrection allowed us to do things differently than in the past, but Jesus himself stated that you should follow the commandments(Mark 10:19, Luke 18:20, and it's stated in dozens of other places in the NT). To not follow these commandments will make you least important in the kingdom of Heaven (Matthew 5:19). Living through Christ, the 10 Commandments will be obeyed. |
||||||
50 | Sabbath because it is a rule? | Col 2:16 | KBurgee | 2616 | ||
Oh. My fault, tee hee. Now I know, and knowing is half the battle (GI Joe!!!) | ||||||
51 | Impossible to renew to repentance? | Heb 6:6 | KBurgee | 3597 | ||
To know the gospel and not believe it is the one unpardonable sin. It's one thing to give in to sin; yet ask for forgiveness and believe that God will deliver you from it. It's totally another to actually KNOW about God, THEN openly diss Him, believing what you say. Satan knew God, but it didn't stop him from attempting a heavenly coup d'etat, which God smacked down with His coup de grace (or is it coup DISgrace? Coup DISS grace? Sorry, having fun with words, hehe) Once you are led to Christ, once you hear the gospel, if you still continue to disbelieve and reject Him, what makes you think you deserve get another shot? If you reject Him now when He shows His power and glory, what's to stop you from rejecting Him later? If that doesn't convince you, then basically nothing will. It takes a lot to first confess to know that Jesus died for your sins, then say "Naw, this ain't real. He didn't die and come back; this is garbage". God shows mercy and unlimited patience with those who know that He is God. He does not want to see any of His children perish. But to openly and outright reject God and believe it after knowing about Him is unforgivable. To know the truth and say it's whacked is the sure method to get a one-way ticket to that smelting pool we call Hell. |
||||||
52 | Partakers of the Holy Spirit? | Heb 6:6 | KBurgee | 3602 | ||
Wow, this is a great topic! I never realized how difficult this really is. But that's good! True knowledge isn't always easy, hehe. Paul isn't speaking about a certainty; this is a hypothetical situation. Some people (thanx, study Bible!) who do not believe in "eternal security" who believe in "conditional salvation" think that the passage refers to people who fall away from the faith; others think that these people weren't fully Christians (I don't understand that; either you accept or you don't, unless we're talking maturity levels in Christ), and that other verses teach eternal security. If there were an actual documented case of criticizing God after accepting Him, I'd like to know. Check out John 5:24 and 6:37; Romans 8:1; Hebrews 8:12. Personally? Changing someone's heart is difficult. I don't understand how anyone can reject God after being in His spirit, unless they are really, really, bad? Who wants to taste and see that the Lord is good, then go back to eating trash? The only example I have is Satan. He was a partaker of the spirit (shoot, he was God's praise director! How do you NOT know?), yet openly defied God with his act. As a result, he can never be (nor does he deserve to be) saved. Hope they help. I'd love to learn more about this as well. K |
||||||
53 | Partakers of the Holy Spirit? | Heb 6:6 | KBurgee | 3604 | ||
Sorry. Forgot to mention that it was THE AUTHOR making this a hypothetical situation, and NOT Paul. I apologize for the mixup. | ||||||
54 | Is fellowship with God conditional? | 1 John 1:9 | KBurgee | 3160 | ||
The only proven way of "knowing" God is to study His word. We all do sin; it's part of our nature. God looks at one sin no differently than another. He looks at lying the same way as killing someone; it ain't good, and it goes against His nature (Think of it as ways you can get fired from your job; stealing money is looked at the same way as slugging your boss, in a sense). We all deserve death; it's only with God sacrificing His Son do we now have an escape from death, as well as a way to get closer to Him (symbolic of Matthew 27:51, as the curtain that symbolized the separation of God from man was ripped). Part of our fellowship and our walk with God starts with understanding who we are, and that we are, in fact, all sinners, and deserving of going to Hell. But we also must know of God's unfailing love towards all of us, which shows His grace and mercy, as well as His concern for us. What He desires is to be close to us, to be intimate with us, to be more than our "best friend", sibling, whatever. When we sin, it separates us from God a bit (God is perfect and hates sin), and therefore, our fellowship with the Lord is hindered, at times by our own guilt. In that way (not only that way, just focusing on that way), when we confess to God about our sin, He basically says "OK. It's all good. Let's move on." It's because of that sin (and guilt) that it hinders our fellowship. But always remember 1 Cor. 10:13. It will help you to escape the temptation that sin is famous for, and it may also keep you from "bouncing" too much :-). Jesus is the solid rock from which I stand, and I know it won't bounce, hehe. I hope this helps. If there's anyway else I can help (or if anyone has constructive arguments about this), email me! |
||||||
55 | Only 144,000 virgins in heaven? | Revelation | KBurgee | 76025 | ||
What's up charis? I find it interesting to note that a lot of people use this as a competition, but if the 144,000 that other religions use that number, common sense tells you that with the millions of people in the world who believe that (not the Gospel) and the millions who have passed away, that's a tiny number. It's also sad because of the people who believed they're one of the 144K. It's like you think you've got the winning number for the lottery and come to find out it's not in your state. | ||||||
56 | What is 666? | Revelation | KBurgee | 76066 | ||
666 is the mark of the beast and it will be visible for all to see. Rev 13:16 - And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 17) And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 18) Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man, and his number is Six hundred threescore six. So the people who follow the antichrist will have the mark, and it will be visible in some form, and it will have the name of the beast on it. |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 ] |