Results 261 - 280 of 575
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: jlpangilinan Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
261 | What was Pilate's sin? Does it matter? | Romans | jlpangilinan | 66884 | ||
You write "No, if Pilate had freed Jesus the people would not have crucified him. Israel was under the rule and occupation of Rome by the massive force of Roman legions. Pilate could have stifled any riot, but he did not want to have to -- he'd rather crucify an innocent man." If pilate freed Jesus, how they crusified Him? do you have other in mind how Jesus Christ sacrifice aside by being crusified. |
||||||
262 | What was Pilate's sin? Does it matter? | Romans | jlpangilinan | 66874 | ||
If he free Jesus, do you think how the people could crucify Him. Did Pilate has choice, do you think it is not part of the devine plan that Christ will be crusified that was prophcies even the old testament? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
263 | Do all little ones believe? | Matt 18:6 | jlpangilinan | 66743 | ||
Charis, No problem, I know that we born by flesh and we are not righteous as scriptures said. But my friend my argument here really is the sin that will bring young babies to hell. If they are not capable of deciding what to do, how could you judge them. You said that a six month babies is already demanding of what they want, are responsible for that. They just do that but they dont know that yet, they cannot remember that yet. I hope I am clear now. You said is there scriptures declares clearly that children are sinless and innocent, what I can show to you is this. 1Jo 3:4 ¶ Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. I know six month babies are not capable of trnasgressing the law, wheter the law of moses or the law of Christ. I cannot even teach them thoul shall love the lord with all your might, soul, how can they understand this things yet. Re 20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. and every man were judge according to thier works' what works did we judge to a six month old babies that not capable of changing even his own diapers? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
264 | Do all little ones believe? | Matt 18:6 | jlpangilinan | 66741 | ||
I do believed to the salvation of all young Children, because I know God is just. Mt 16:27 For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works. Re 20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. Re 20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. If young infants died what bad works they did commit anyway to be judge and go to hell. Even they are son or daughter of non believer we cannot blame them they have not given the opportunity to know Jesus. We cannot judge them because of the wickedness of thier father as the scriptures said: Eze 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
265 | Do all little ones believe? | Matt 18:6 | jlpangilinan | 66737 | ||
Charis, Some of your note, I dont understand really. I was responding to the note that infants have sinned, and my answer is they are not capable of transgressing the law. 1Jo 3:4 ¶ Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. 1Jo 3:4 ¶ Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. I dont know also how the six months old are ready and willing to sin , as you mentioned. Are they really capable of transgressing the law. In my personal expereinces my daughter is now 5 years, and if I am asking her if she remember what we did to her when she was a baby, but she cannot have one. Is that instances in the bible that a six month old babies disobey the law, whether law of Christ, or the law of moses? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
266 | Do all little ones believe? | Matt 18:6 | jlpangilinan | 66715 | ||
good morning from the Philippines! What time do you have there? Im sure you still in your computer. I will read the thread of this topic, I am sorry if I did not yet read your post to Cyclist. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
267 | Do all little ones believe? | Matt 18:6 | jlpangilinan | 66714 | ||
For sin is the transgression of the law: 1Jo 3:4 ¶ Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. It is impossible to a one month old babies are capable of transgression of the law, what law do you think the child can disobey being a little babies. take a look at this verse. Heb 5:13 For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. A babe is unskilful in the word of righteousness, it is impossible also that he sinned if he dont know yet what is wrong and what is right? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
268 | Do all little ones believe? | Matt 18:6 | jlpangilinan | 66711 | ||
I dont think that little babies is sinned already. You quoted Proverbs 20:11 Even a child is known by his doings, whether his work be pure, and whether it be right. You have seen to him, whether his work be pure, and wehther it be right, but it is not mean he is already accountable for his sin. For sin is the transgression of the law: 1Jo 3:4 ¶ Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. How come that a one month old babies is capable of transgression of the law, what law do you think he disobey being a little baby? take a look at this verse. Heb 5:13 For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. A babe is unskilful in the word of righteousness, how come that he sinned if he dont know yet what is wrong and what is right? God bless, Johnny |
||||||
269 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 66493 | ||
Charis, In our church, we encourage our members to give love offering, any purposes of the heart, not ten percent, not twenty but in any purposes of the heart. Aside from that we discourage non-member to give love offering if they are our visitors. We put a something in the front that our visitors will see, "we are not accepted love offering from non-members" As a matter of fact we supported our church through love offering, our pastor did not received salary from the church, they have thier own job to support thier family. It is part of thier devotion not to be burdensome to a members what paul did.: 2Co 12:14 Behold, the third time I am ready to come to you; and I will not be burdensome to you: for I seek not yours, but you: for the children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the parents for the children. We have hospital (inside that convention center I was mentioneds to a year ago)and home for the most unfortunate members of the church. We have members that enable to give, this are members that no job, or two old already to work or disable person, we keep them in the home for our unfortunate members. As the apostle did, we never taught tithes, as part of the income of the church, we support our television program through love offering. We have big overhead for those program, and for the amount that we cannot paid, it our head brother find the solutions how to pay for those. He was inspired by the life of paul not to be burdensome to the members because we consider him as our parents in faith. Philippines is one of a developing country, we have people here stay in the garbage area, but to let you know we have no members that die because they cannot eat, we keep them we supported them, every members of the church counted, and for those most unfortunate, we bring them and help them, we have place for them. We take good care of every member of the church. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
270 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 66367 | ||
Charis, Greetings from the Philippines, If you read the thread, and even before I am not really against giving, but if someone require me of some amount such as ten twenty percent is not really for the christian. Everyone is free to give to the church, whether it is ten twenty or even the whole of your salary it is acceptable to God, but in any purposes of the heart, and not as a requirements. Even in the time of patriach tithes is not a requirements, abraham give tithes but no one require him to gave but he gave. Tithe really becomes a requirements under the law of moses, everyone knows that. It was an important part of thier religion in order to support levites. But in the time of Christ, it is not a requirements, the teaching goes in a way of love offering (the example of widow). To prove that Christ did not require anyone to tithes is there is no single occassion in the new testament that both Christ and apostle never received and give tithes, it is the fact. I was wondering, and continue wondering that there are people again teach the tithes as a requirements, they cannot accept the teaching of love offering but tithes as a requirements. My wonder really is if Christ not required us to tithe, and the desciples never observed the tithes, why we should require our members to tithe? are more authorize than them? Charis, I hope you read the magazine Heaven can't wait. God bless, and Banzai! Johnny |
||||||
271 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 66277 | ||
I think the one that is none sense those wo are trying to add thier conclusions to what is really recorded in the bible. If questioning the authority of the bible make sense to you it is your descision. But I am really sure, that your conclusions cannot change what has been recorded. It is you trying to quote my post to someone anyway, it is not me started the trhead. May God bless you too. Johnny |
||||||
272 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 66276 | ||
I think the one that is none sense those wo are trying to add thier conclusions to what is really recorded in the bible. If questioning the authority of the bible make sense to you it is your descision. But I am really sure, that your conclusions cannot change what has been recorded. It is you trying to quote my post to someone anyway, it is not me started the trhead. May God bless you too. Johnny |
||||||
273 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 66263 | ||
then, your logic is wrong, we are talking about tithes, but you bring the example of cars that was not mentioned. I was asking you to show me if some desciples pay tithes and who received tithes, because I believed that If tithe is really important they must observed that and it must recorded because it is part of a doctrine and teaching. You brought your logic that if it is not important why cars is not mentioned in the bible but it is important today. We are talking about tithes here, cars is nothing to do with the tithes and doctrine, if you think it is part of your doctrine it is up to you. I realize that you are interested in the things that not recorded at least in the new testament, than the recorded one. there is no recorded that Christ receiving tithes in the new testament, paul himself did not taught it, but you still come up with the conlcusion that they maybe received tithes. If tithes really is the important for Christian why paul taught love offering instead of tithing? it is not my opinion that tithes is not in the Christian, because it is not observed by the apostle I will not observed it also we just follow them, and I will not try to teach the teaching that they did not observe and taught. It is you CONCLUSIONS that they maybe observed YOU ARE NOT SURE IF THEY REALLY DO. Me i am sure that they did not observe it, otherwise they recorded it. Bible is not written for you conclsuions, it was written to make us believe in it not to have conclusions on it. Scriptures will not fail if regarding important teaching (not cars) Isa 34:16 Seek ye out of the book of the LORD, and read: no one of these shall fail, none shall want her mate: for my mouth it hath commanded, and his spirit it hath gathered them. Receiving and observing tithes did not observe by the apostle it is you try to correct them by giving your conclusion that they maybe do it or practice it. It is up to you if your after to those it is not recorded that the recorded ones. Love offering is recored in the new testamnert, it was taught by the apostle. Tithes is not it is up to you if you are not believed in them and come up with your own conclusions. It is not me hard to understand, it is you you find things that is not recorded in the teaching of Christian, it is not recorded that they receive or give tithes, it is you correcting the scriptures that they maybe did. Who are you trying to change the letter of the authorize, who are you that trying to questions the authority of the bible by putting your own conclusion, who are you to make us believed that they is maybe some desciple that observed the tithing even it is not recored? Do you think we are going to believed your conclusions intead of the scriptures? The new testament did not recorded the event of receiving/giving tithes of the apostle, dont change that with your own conclusion it is a very strong attack to the author of the Bible. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
274 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 66149 | ||
You want me to stop but you still using your deffective logic. You write"I have readily admitted things that no one could prove, because they are simply not addressed in the Bible. I then said because it isn’t mentioned we should not assume it never happened. You mocked my logic. You said if it was important Jesus would have mentioned it. Then continuing with your logic you state because Jesus never mentioned it we shouldn't do it. Is that logic? Is it the truth? Jesus never mentioned driving or riding in a car yet it so very important we do this everyday, maybe we shouldn’t be doing it or maybe your logic doesn’t hold water." You know that we are talking about tithes but again you used another excuses like cars. Did cars is important for your salvation is that a doctrine that Christ has to mentioned it. We are talking about doctrine and teaching here not cars, and specifically tithing and not with the problem of traffic police. Please dont think that Christ will do teaching about cars or traffic this will not do with the teaching of Christ! I want really this topic remains in a Christian tone, but it is start accussing me of false statement. You try to insist your logic even it is nothing to do with the topic. Johnny |
||||||
275 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 66138 | ||
Inmyheart, As I said in all of my posting regarding tithes, it is not a requirements, people can give freely but if there someone requires them to give, and the amount is mandated i.e ten percent or something there is something wrong. If Christ, and apostle did not require us to give ten percent, why others would try to require us? We can give as free as we can. If we can give more than twenty percent of our income please do, but make sure that there is no someone require you. Thanks for the note, I know we have some disagreement with this before. Everyone learned from each other, and I hope I can make it always in Christian tone. My apology for anyone if may made offended. God bless Johnny |
||||||
276 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 66108 | ||
My condition there is simple show me the scriptures that He received tithes, or the desciples that give or receive tithes. The mere fact that you cannot show it meaning it is not included in thier teaching. If this tithes is important it must be happened to the life of apostle, but they never do it, what always happened in terms of giving is love offering, the example of widow is a very fact that love offering is the teaching of Christ Paul teach us to give as cherful giver, if the tithes is the true teaching of Christ, why paul teach love offering instead of tithes. As paul he receive his teaching not from man but from Jesus Christ. So paul should teach tithing instead of love offering, if Christ really teach the tithe. What you showed me is your conclusions, bible was not written for your conclusions, it was written to believe in it. The woman help paul trough love offering paul did not ask them to give ten percent of thier income, it is you conclusion said that they maybe give tithes. If tithes is requirements and important the desciple should teach that and observed that but it never mentioned meaning it is not important for Christian. I asked you to show me the scriptures if they receive tithes, and give tithes. Your answer is but me I cannot show you too that they did not, if you you understand logic, how can I show the things that is not there! it is your responsibility that show that there is any people that observed tithing not me because I am believed that there no desciples in the new testamnet that observed tithing. So how can I show the things that I really believe that was not there, please repair your logic it quiet broken. I was wondering, and continue wondering, even before the law the tithe is not a requirements abraham give tithes but no one requires him to give but he gave. Under the law it was required by moses to give to the levites. it become an important part of thier religion. When Christ, he free us from the works of law, and make tithes not a requirements by teaching love offering. I was wondering that after Christ free us from the requirements of the law there people that trying to take them back and make again the tithes as a requirements. So the sequence is this. The time of patriach, the tithe is not a requirements but voluntarily as abraham did. In the time of moses it was a requirements. In the time of Christ and the desciples, it was love offering, when the time EdB comes, it was a requirements again. Go on EdB, I hope there are someone comes again that will free us in tithes as a requirements. God bless, Johnny I was wondering that there are people that trying to teach teaching that was not taught by the apostle, there people trying to be wiser than the authority of the bible. |
||||||
277 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 66017 | ||
Again, I dont know if you are starting fight here, you always accussing me that my statement is false. Let me remind you that I post this question to you and you never ecxplain it yet. you can prove that my statement is false if you can prove that there is anyone give tithes to Jesus Christ is there any desciples that received tithes as well: This questions remains. If Jesus clearly said that we have to pay tihes why there is no single moment in the new testament that He receive tithes or there are any desciples give tithes are they not follow the commandments of Christ? Kindly answers those questions. If you cannot show any desciples that received tithes or any desciple that give tithes to Jesus Christ, it is clear that your statement was false and not mine. Johnny |
||||||
278 | tithing | Acts 13:39 | jlpangilinan | 65998 | ||
EdB please calm down, please dont tell me that I making false statement you cannot prove that. Even before the law tithes is not a requirement Even abraham pay the tithes, no one requires give but he gave. Mt 23:23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. Jesus never said here directly that you give tithes, if you give tithes dont forget other matters of the law. As a proof of that no one can show that Jesus received tithes or any desciples give tihes and they not required anyone to tithes. If Jesus clearly said that we have to pay tihes why there is no single moment in the new testament that He receive tithes or there are any desciples give tithes are they not follow the commandments of Christ? Kindly answers those questions. Edb, we have to settle this in Christian tone, again may I request not accusing me of making false statement because you cannot prove that. To prove that I make false statement you should show me any person in the new testament that Christ requires to give tithes, and any single moment that there are desciples that give or receive tithes. May I ask you EdB, did you require your members to give tithes? I want an answer of Yes or No! God bless, Johnny |
||||||
279 | Should I resign from the Forum? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 65841 | ||
denny, It was rabbi mark accused mommapbs of error not the enemy, please be careful, it could be a big strike to rabbi mark too. Just commented fair for both side. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
280 | Should I resign from the Forum? | Bible general Archive 1 | jlpangilinan | 65838 | ||
denny, It was rabbi mark accused mommapbs of error not the enemy, please be careful, it could be a big strike to rabbi mark too. Just commented fair for both side. God bless, Johnny |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ] Next > Last [29] >> |