Results 221 - 240 of 4232
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: kalos Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
221 | HONOR THY SABBATH | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 117006 | ||
"No one doubts that Yeshua (Jesus) kept the Shabbat on the correct day. Had he not, he would have violated the Torah making him a sinner (1 Jn. 3:4)" ____________________ Will the Real Sabbath Please Stand Up? "...the burden of proof is on the other side to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the weekly cycle has been altered since the time of Yeshua the Messiah. If they cannot prove this, then no amount of clever reasoning either from secular or Scriptural sources matters, for it is all irrelevant to the issue." ____________________ The "Lunar Sabbath" or Saturday Sabbath: Will the Real Sabbath Please Stand Up? by N’tan (Nathan) Lawrence 'And while most Sabbatarians never even think to question the seeming inviolate nature of the weekly cycle, but unquestioningly assume that it has never changed, there is, nonetheless, a very small, fringe group of Sabbatarians who believe that the weekly cycle has indeed changed. These individuals are vocal beyond their size and some can be extremely aggressive, divisive and downright mean-spirited in their zeal to convert the world to their opinion. Some of these individuals are very biblically learned and have swept some who are subpar to them in learning and scholarship into the belief that the weekly cycle has been changed and that the seventh day today is not the seventh day of creation, or of the early Hebrews, nor yet even of Yeshua or the Apostolic Fathers. These individuals claim, with little or no supporting evidence, that the weekly cycle was changed after the first century and before the middle of the fourth century A.D. 'There is a group of secular scholars who are part historian and part astronomer whose profession it is to study matters such as chronology, calendars and the weekly cycle. These scholars are employed by governments to keep time and to insure that records are correct. If our timing is off, then how can we fire a missile and hit a target? Or fire a rocket and hit the moon? These individuals are called chronologists and they have definite opinions about the weekly cycle. The “lunar Sabbath” proponents do not quote these scientists, and for good reason. But we will, for we are not afraid of the truth, and the truth needs no defense. (...) 'Upon reading the written explanations and apologies of the “lunar Sabbath” advocates one could be easily swayed to their position by their admittedly in-depth biblical understanding and often-times scholarly approach, and sometime cleaver polemic. But upon careful analysis, the holes in their line of reasoning become readily apparent. It is not the scope of this work to address all the issues they throw up. Those of us who keep the Shabbat on Saturday don’t have to, for the burden of proof is on the other side to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the weekly cycle has been altered since the time of Yeshua the Messiah. If they cannot prove this, then no amount of clever reasoning either from secular or Scriptural sources matters, for it is all irrelevant to the issue. 'How can I aver this so forcefully? It is rather quite simple logic. No one doubts that Yeshua kept the Shabbat on the correct day. Had he not, he would have violated the Torah making him a sinner (1 Jn. 3:4) and not the perfect sacrificial lamb slain for the redemption of sinful man. If he kept a “lunar Shabbat”, as the “lunar Sabbath” advocates maintain, then the burden of proof is upon them to prove that the weekly cycle was changed after the time of Yeshua. If it can be proved that the weekly cycle indeed did not change from the time of Yeshua until now, then the lunar Sabbath advocates have lost the argument and everything else they say or write, no matter how persuasive or scholarly it may be, is moot and irrelevant.' ____________________ To read the entire article, go to: (http://www.tnnonline.net/theonews/ten-commandments/lunar-sabbath/) |
||||||
222 | HONOR THY SABBATH | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 117170 | ||
The Sabbath in Acts 'Among the several references to the Sabbath in Acts (1:12; 13:14-44; 15:21; 17:2; 18:4; 20:7) there is little evidence to suggest that the earliest Christian communities deviated from the traditional Sabbath observed on the seventh day. The lone reference to a gathering "On the first day of the week" (20:7) most likely reflects an emerging Christian consensus that the first day was an appropriate day on which to meet for worship and celebrating the Lord's Supper.' ____________________ (http://bible.crosswalk.com/Dictionaries/BakersEvangelicalDictionary/bed.cgi) |
||||||
223 | HONOR THY SABBATH | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 117171 | ||
'Feasts and Festivals of Israel 'The major festivals of Old Testament Israel were, in calendar order, Passover, Unleavened Bread, Firstfruits, the Feast of Weeks (Pentecost), the Feast of Trumpets, the Day of Atonement, and the Feast of Booths (Tabernacles or Ingathering). After the exile, the Jews added memorial days for the fall of Jerusalem (eventually fixed as the Ninth of Ab), Purim, and the Feast of Dedication (Hanukkah). In addition, the Israelites observed the Sabbath every week and the feast of the New Moon every lunar month.' ____________________ Paragraph 1 of the article 'Feasts and Festivals of Israel' in Baker's Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology To read the rest of the article go to (http://bible.crosswalk.com/Dictionaries/BakersEvangelicalDictionary/bed.cgi) |
||||||
224 | Is Moses in Heaven or Hell | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 117368 | ||
It's interesting to read the standard Watchtower doctrine of hell. But before I can answer ministermay's question, I need to know what he or she means when using the word hell. | ||||||
225 | Bible version can become an idol? | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 117531 | ||
The word "YHWH" ("Yahweh" or "Jehovah") occurs in the original language text of the OT nearly 7,000 times. You write: 'the Jehovas witnessess, one of the changes that they add and remove to the Bible was the word "JEHOVAH" almost all of the word "LORD" "GOD" was change into the word "Jehovah". This is clearly an add remove which was prohibited by the Bible.' Actually the reverse is true. In fact, in almost all of our English translations, the word "YHWH" has been changed into the word "LORD" -- and not the other way around. Moreover, this is merely translating the Bible from one language into another and does not constitute adding to or taking away. |
||||||
226 | Bible version can become an idol? | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 117559 | ||
My brother in the Lord, Studying the whole Bible (OT and NT) is EXACTLY what I've been doing. For a change, I have been reading and learning about the Torah (Law) and the Tanakh (OT) without having it filtered through 2,000 years of Gentile Christian teaching and commentary. You write: "how do you reconcile these scriptures with your insistance that the OT is still applicable to us today?" Rowdy, I have posted several Notes to you explaining and defending my understanding of the believer's relationship to the Law. In my answers, I have included much Scripture. So, considering the Scriptures I've already provided, my question for you is: How do you reconcile THESE Scriptures with your insistence that the OT is NOT applicable to us today?" '...I already told you and you would not listen. Why do you want to hear it again?...' (AMPLIFIED John 9:27) Rowdy, I appreciate you and your interest. And I do not wish to be drawn into a debate. In more than a dozen recent posts I have said what I have to say and explained what I can explain regarding the Law. I assure you my mind always remains open to the Word of God in its entirety, as I am sure yours does also. Once again, thank you for your interest and input. Grace and shalom, kalos |
||||||
227 | Bible version can become an idol? | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 117565 | ||
Hank: I agree. Moreover, if God has effectively nullified two-thirds of his Word by replacing the Old Testament, then Jesus must have been confused when He said: "I have not come to abolish the Law." (For those having trouble with the English language, "fulfill" does not mean "abolish". If it did, then Jesus was saying: "I have not come to abolish the law, but to abolish it." That makes a lot of sense, doesn't it?) Shalom, kalos |
||||||
228 | Bible version can become an idol? | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 117589 | ||
Adhering to a "higher standard" does not abolish the original commandment.'In the Sermon on the Mount, Yeshua does not contradict the Ten Commandments, but rather instructs us as to what is the true "heart-meaning" of the Law. In that sense He makes the Law even more demanding.' You write: 'One of the 10 commandments was to make the Sabbath holy which goes in direct opposition to the NT command by example of worship assembly on the "first day of the week."' There is no such thing as a "command by example." No example or consensus supersedes one of God's commandments. Further, the OT does not go in opposition to the NT. Nor do we test the OT by comparing it to the NT. A careful reading of the NT will show that it (the NT) is appraised and validated by its harmony with the OT. "If the New Covenant were to contradict previously given scriptures in the Law or the Prophets, then the New Covenant would not be true." The Sabbath in Acts 'Among the several references to the Sabbath in Acts (1:12; 13:14-44; 15:21; 17:2; 18:4; 20:7) there is little evidence to suggest that the earliest Christian communities deviated from the traditional Sabbath observed on the seventh day. The lone reference to a gathering "On the first day of the week" (20:7) most likely reflects an emerging Christian consensus that the first day was an appropriate day on which to meet for worship and celebrating the Lord's Supper.' ____________________ (http://bible.crosswalk.com/Dictionaries/BakersEvangelicalDictionary/bed.cgi) |
||||||
229 | Bible version can become an idol? | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 117592 | ||
Words of Wisdom from Morant61: "In a debate, it is useful if you respond to the points that the other side makes." Regarding my Note "The law cannot be altogether invalid...", I have repeatedly asked: "If you disagree with any of the following, could you quote at least some of the part(s) you disagree with and tell why you disagree"? In other words, please directly address the points I have made. Instead of repeating a general statement you previously made, tell me specifically what is wrong with the points I've made. # 113992 |
||||||
230 | soul of unsaved people | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 117931 | ||
You write: "Luke 16:19-31 is a parable. This is even specifically stated as being a parable." Show us the evidence! Tell us the book, chapter and verse where this is specifically stated as being a parable. |
||||||
231 | soul of unsaved people | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 117991 | ||
Man is made up of three parts: Spirit, Soul and Body 1 Thessalonians 5:23 says, "Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you entirely; and may your spirit and soul and body be preserved complete, without blame at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ." There is a difference between man's breath and spirit: "Thus says the Lord, who created the heavens and stretched them out, who spread out the earth and its offspring, who gives breath to the people on it, and spirit to those who walk in it." Isaiah 42:5 Destination After Death "For to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain. But if I am to live on in the flesh, this will mean fruitful labor for me; and I do not know which to choose. But I am hard-pressed from both directions, having the desire to depart and be with Christ, for that is very much better; yet to remain on in the flesh is more necessary for your sake." Philippians 1:21-24 "Therefore, being always of good courage, and knowing that while we are at home in the body we are absent from the Lord—for we walk by faith, not by sight—we are of good courage, I say . . . and prefer rather to be absent from the body and to be at home with the Lord." 2 Corinthians 5:6-8 The Soul is Conscious After Death Revelation 6:9-11 "And when He broke the fifth seal, I saw underneath the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God, and because of the testimony which they had maintained; and they cried out with a loud voice, saying, 'How long, O Lord, holy and true, wilt Thou refrain from judging and avenging our blood on those who dwell on the earth?' And there was given to each of them a white robe; and they were told that they should rest for a while longer, until the number of their fellow servants and their brethren who were to be killed even as they had been, should be completed also." Obviously a person's soul is more than his breath. These robed souls under the altar, crying out to God, are not "breaths." Note that these souls are conscious after death. They were martyred and after death are very much alive in Heaven. They have the ability to cry out to God and to wear white robes. God Himself tells them that more of their brethren will join them after they are killed. Again in Revelation 20:4 "And I saw thrones; and they sat upon them, and judgement was given to them. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of the testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshipped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark upon their forehead and upon their hand; they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years." Additional Scriptures Indicating the Consciousness of the Soul after Death Job 26:5-6 Matthew 22:31, 32 Luke 16:19-31 1 Thessalonians 5:10 Isaiah 14:9-11; 15-17 When the Soul Leaves the Body, the Body Sleeps The term "sleep" is never applied to the soul or the spirit, but only the body. The soul and the spirit continue to exist after death. The body "sleeps" and goes back to dust. The following verses refer to the state of the body's death as sleep: Matthew 9:24 "He began to say, 'Depart; for the girl has not died, but is asleep.' And they were laughing at Him." John 11:11 "This He said, and after that He said to them, 'Our friend Lazarus has fallen asleep; but I go, that I may awaken him out of sleep.'"Acts 7:59-60 "And they went on stoning Stephen as he called upon the Lord and said, 'Lord Jesus, receive my spirit!' And falling on his knees, he cried out with a loud voice, 'Lord do not hold this sin against them!' And having said this, he fell asleep." Acts 13:36 "For David, after he had served the purpose of God in his own generation fell asleep, and was laid among his fathers, and underwent decay." 1 Thessalonians 4:14 "For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who have fallen asleep in Jesus." ____________________ (http://www.sdaoutreach.org/) |
||||||
232 | soul of unsaved people | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 117992 | ||
Part 2. Man is made up of three parts: Spirit, Soul and Body Man's Soul and Man's Spirit are More than Breath 1 Samuel 18:1 "Now it came about when he had finished speaking to Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit to the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as himself." 2 Samuel 5:8 "And David said on that day, 'Whoever would strike the Jebusites, let him reach the lame and the blind, who are hated by David's soul, through the water tunnel.' Therefore they say, the blind or the lame shall not come into the house." Mark 14:34 "And He said to them, 'My soul is deeply grieved to the point of death; remain here and keep watch.'" Psalm 107:26 "They rose up to the heavens, they went down to the depth; their souls melted away in their misery." Luke 2:35 " . . . and a sword will pierce even your own soul to the end that thoughts from many hearts may be revealed." Man's Spirit is what is Regenerated John 3:6-7 "That which is born of flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not marvel that I said to you, 'You must be born again.'" God Works Through Man's Spirit Proverbs 20:27 "The spirit of man is the lamp of the Lord, searching all the innermost parts of his being." Man's Spirit has: INTELLIGENCE (1 Corinthians 2:11) "For who among men knows the thoughts of a man except the spirit of the man, which is in him? Even so the thoughts of God no one knows except the Spirit of God." EMOTIONS (John 11:33) "When Jesus therefore saw her weeping, and the Jews who came with her, also weeping, He was deeply moved in spirit and was troubled." The Soul and the Spirit are Separated from the Body at Death Luke 8:54-55 ". . . he, however, took her by the hand and called, saying, 'Child arise!' And her spirit returned, and she rose immediately; and He gave orders for something to be given her to eat." Matthew 10:28 "And do not fear those who kill the body, but are unable to kill the soul but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both the soul and the body in hell." James 2:26 "For just as the body without the spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead." 1 Kings 17:21,22 "Then he stretched himself upon the child three times, and called to the Lord, and said, 'O Lord my God, I pray to Thee, let this child's life return to him.' And the Lord heard the voice of Elijah, and the life of the child returned to him and he revived." The term "death" which is "thanatas" in Greek, does not mean to be non-existent or unconscious, it rather means to be separated. Some examples: Colossians 2:13 "And when you were dead (separated from God—not "unconscious") in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh . . . " Ecclesiastes 9:5 "For the living know they will die; but the dead do not know anything, nor have they any longer a reward, for their memory is forgotten." The context of this verse is "under the sun." It is saying that the dead do not know anything that is going on "under the sun"(on earth) vss. 3, 6—after they die and are in Heaven. (Eccl. 12:7) See also Ephesians 2:1 and Revelation 3:1 These scriptures clearly teach that the soul and spirit are more than breath. People's souls and spirits are separated from their bodies when they die. The soul is conscious in Heaven after death, awaiting the resurrection of the body. ____________________ http://www.sdaoutreach.org/ |
||||||
233 | soul of unsaved people | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 118005 | ||
Lazarus and the Rich Man (Luke 16:19-31) 'Some say that this is a parable. However, if it is, it is unique because no other parable actually names a person. It isn't a story. It is history. It really happened. But many who believe in no consciousness after death will say it is still a parable.' There are questions about Lazarus and the Rich Man (Luke 16) that remain unanswered. Tell me, if you can, what are the answers to these questions? QUESTION: 'If this is a parable, What is it teaching?' 'If hell fire is false and if self-awareness after death is also false, then Jesus is using false doctrines to teach a truth. Parables illustrate truth.' QUESTION: 'If it is a parable what does the consciousness after death symbolize?' QUESTION: 'Also, what does the agony in flame symbolize?' 'Jesus spoke more of hell than heaven and spent so much time warning people not to go there.' QUESTION: 'After all, if people just stopped existing, why warn them?' If it was temporal, they'd get out in a while. But if it were eternal and conscious, then the warning is strong. 'Jesus said, "And if your right eye makes you stumble, tear it out, and throw it from you; for it is better for you that one of the parts of your body perish, than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. 30"And if your right hand makes you stumble, cut it off, and throw it from you; for it is better for you that one of the parts of your body perish, than for your whole body to go into hell," (Matt. 5:29-30).' ____________________ (http://www.carm.org/doctrine/hell.htm) |
||||||
234 | soul of unsaved people | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 118006 | ||
Where does it say that? Show us the evidence! You write: "Luke 16:19-31 is a parable. This is even specifically stated as being a parable." Show us the book, chapter and verse where this is specifically stated as being a parable. |
||||||
235 | Does the OT apply to us as christians? | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 118499 | ||
NT in conflict with OT? Unbelievable! The NT does not contradict the OT. ____________________ "If the New Covenant were to contradict previously given scriptures in the Law or the Prophets, then the New Covenant would not be true." ____________________ It is not true 'that the moral absolutes of the Law are no longer applicable to us. The New Covenant does not "do away" with the Law in that sense, but rather writes it in our hearts* (Jeremiah 31:31). 'For any system of truth to be valid, it must be consistent with itself. Contradictions disprove truth. If the New Covenant were to contradict previously given scriptures in the Law or the Prophets, then the New Covenant would not be true' (Seven Pillars of Messianic Judaism, Asher Intrater, 2003**). ____________________ *writes it in our hearts. NASB Jeremiah 31:33 "But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days," declares the LORD, "I will put My law within them and on their heart I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people." 'It takes unacceptable theological legerdemain to conclude that when God writes the Torah (law) on hearts he changes it into something other than the Torah' (Restoring the Jewishness of the Gospel, David H. Stern, Jewish New Testament Publications, Inc., 1988)! **"Seven Pillars of Messianic Judaism" To read the entire quote, see ID# 115300. |
||||||
236 | Does the OT apply to us as christians? | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 118559 | ||
To "make full" the meaning of the Torah "Don't think that I have come to abolish the Torah or the Prophets. I have come not to abolish but to complete." There is no conflict between Moses' commandments and Jesus' teachings on them in which He gives the 'complete, full spiritual sense to be understood and obeyed'. For example, where is the conflict between a command to not murder your brother and a command to not be angry with him or call him a fool? Far from there being a conflict, both of these commands -- don't be angry and do not murder -- are in harmony with each other. "Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill." Matthew 5:17 'Replacement theology likewise understands that Yeshua at his first coming fulfilled the Torah, so that we don't have to do so (the logic leading to this conclusion is unclear);... 'But the word usually translated "fulfill", Greek pleroo, does not necessarily convey this specific sense. Rather, it is a very common word which simply means "fill", "fill up", "make full", as in filling a cup or a hole. It should be evident that the actual meaning is as rendered in the Jewish New Testament: "Don't think that I have come to abolish the Torah or the Prophets. I have come not to abolish but to complete" -- that is, to "make full" the meaning of what the Torah and the ethical demands of the Prophets require. 'In fact, this verse, so understood, states the theme of the entire Sermon on the Mount -- in which six times the Messiah says, "you have heard of old time" the incomplete meaning or a distortion, "but I say to you" the complete, full spiritual sense to be understood and obeyed.' (David H. Stern, "Restoring the Jewishness of the Gospel", 1988, Jewish New Testament Publications, Inc.) |
||||||
237 | Does the OT apply to us as christians? | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 118562 | ||
Hank: Thank you for an excellent post, one which gets right to the heart of the matter and is consistent with both the Scriptures and reason. I am reposting my Note to you so that you will not overlook it. :-) --kalos ******************** To "make full" the meaning of the Torah "Don't think that I have come to abolish the Torah or the Prophets. I have come not to abolish but to complete." The only "conflict" here is between what "you have heard of old time" -- the incomplete meaning or a distortion -- vs. what Jesus shows them -- the complete, full spiritual sense to be understood and obeyed.' The idea that Jesus contradicts Moses is absurd. There is no conflict between Moses' commandments and Jesus' teachings on them. For example, where is the conflict between a command to not murder your brother and a command to not be angry with him or call him a fool? Far from there being a conflict, both of these commands -- don't be angry and do not murder -- are in harmony with each other. IF the text had said that it's not OK to be angry, but it is OK to murder, now THAT would be a contradiction. But there is no such contradiction in the teachings of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount or anywhere else. "Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill." Matthew 5:17 'Replacement theology likewise understands that Yeshua at his first coming fulfilled the Torah, so that we don't have to do so (the logic leading to this conclusion is unclear);... 'But the word usually translated "fulfill", Greek pleroo, does not necessarily convey this specific sense. Rather, it is a very common word which simply means "fill", "fill up", "make full", as in filling a cup or a hole. It should be evident that the actual meaning is as rendered in the Jewish New Testament: "Don't think that I have come to abolish the Torah or the Prophets. I have come not to abolish but to complete" -- that is, to "make full" the meaning of what the Torah and the ethical demands of the Prophets require. 'In fact, this verse, so understood, states the theme of the entire Sermon on the Mount -- in which six times the Messiah says, "you have heard of old time" the incomplete meaning or a distortion, "but I say to you" the complete, full spiritual sense to be understood and obeyed.' (David H. Stern, "Restoring the Jewishness of the Gospel", 1988, Jewish New Testament Publications, Inc.) |
||||||
238 | Does the OT apply to us as christians? | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 118566 | ||
Rowdy: I have nothing against you. I do enjoy our discussions and esteem you as both a friend and brother in the Lord. I mean no sarcasm nor disrespect, but may I remind you: I have posted more than a dozen submissions on the continuing validity of the Law, complete with relevant Scripture references and arguments (proof). You haved directly replied to few or none of them. I would be interested in your direct response to the points I have raised in my posts. Again, I write these things not in a spirit of debate or animosity of any kind. In fact, I hesitated to post this to you for fear that I would unintentionally offend or alienate you. I really do appreciate you, brother, and it is in a spirit of brotherly love and kindness that I write this. Yours in Christ, kalos |
||||||
239 | Book of Amos Chpt 8 and 9 | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 119330 | ||
The following are two of the very best, most complete, most used and useful commentary websites on the Internet. At each of these you can access many commentaries -- all from one website. (http://bible.crosswalk.com/Commentaries/) (http://studylight.org/com/) At this website you will find the following commentaries: 'Adam Clarke Commentary Author of one of the most respected interdenominational commentaries ever written, Adam Clarke shows his Godly respect for the Bible as well as his courage to give his opinion on many difficult and controversial questions other commentaries often avoid. 'John S. C. Abbott and Jacob Abbott Illustrated New Testament Well known throughout the late 1800's for their prolific writings on various subjects, John and Jacob Abbott decided to put to paper their personal study and translation of the original Greek New Testament. Included are 50 woodcut illustrations from the original printing. 'James Burton Coffman's Commentaries: Whole Bible One of the leading authorities in the Church of Christ, Dr. Coffman presents a verse by verse look at God's Word. 'Barne's Notes on the New Testament Educated at Princeton seminary, Albert Barnes was a dedicated student of the Bible. Though passed over by the biographical sketches of influential theological writers, his notes on the New Testament continue to be quite popular even today. 'John Darby's Synopsis of the New Testament These synopses were originally written and published in French and introduced book-by-book. Only the New Testament is available. 'John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible He preached in the same church as C. H. Spurgeon. Gill is little known, but his works contain gems of information found nowhere outside of the ancient Jewish writings. Gill presents a verse-by-verse exposition of the entire Bible. 'Geneva Study Bible Modern believers can read the Scriptures with help from the theology of Calvin, Luther, Zwingli, and other Reformation leaders. It was first printed in 1560. 'David Guzik's Commentaries on the Bible David Guzik is the former senior pastor at Clavary Chapel Simi Valley in California. His excellent study materials have been edifying the Christian community for the past seven years. Currently he is the director of the Calvary Chapel Bible College in Siegen, Germany. 'Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible A one-volume commentary prepared by Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown. It was published in 1871. 'John Lightfoot's Commentary on the Gospels Although only covering the Gospels, this set of commentaries, by the English scholar partially responsible for formulating the Westminster Confession, is full of insight and wisdom. 'Matthew Henry Commentary on the Whole Bible Henry's six volume Complete Commentary provides an exhaustive look at every verse in the Bible. It was written in 1706. 'Matthew Henry Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible Henry's one volume Concise Commentary provides a condensed look at nearly every verse in the Bible. The original was written in 1706. 'Martin Luther's Commentary on Galatians The importance of this Commentary on Galatians for the history of Protestantism is very great. It presents like no other of Luther's writings the central thought of Christianity, the justification of the sinner for the sake of Christ's merits alone. 'J. W. McGarvey's Original Commentary on Acts This one volume work took the author, John W. McGarvey, three years to prepare. Even today it is still hold a place in literature as a work of superior merit. 'People's New Testament This work was written in 1891 for the novice student. It contains aids to help understand every verse 'Robertson's Word Pictures of the New Testament a.T. Robertson, a renowned Greek New Testament scholar, takes the reader verse-by-verse, painting word pictures to describe the actions of Jesus and the early Christians. 'Scofield Reference Notes (1917 Edition) People have relied on this reference work in their daily studies for more than 90 years. C. I. Scofield intended to provide a concise yet complete tool to help the new reader of the Bible. Originally written in 1909. 'The Fourfold Gospel Also known as a "Harmony Of the Four Gospels," this chronology of the life of Christ, by J. W. McGarvey and Philip Y. Pendleton, has titled sections and sub-divisions. Comments are injected in the text. 'The Treasury of David This seven volume magnum opus by Charles H. Spurgeon was first published in weekly installments over 20 years in The Sword and the Trowel, the periodical of Spurgeon's London Metropolitan Tabernacle. Sections were published as separate volumes, with the seventh released in 1885. 'Treasury of Scripture Knowledge The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge has provided a cross-reference resource for Bible students worldwide for generations.' |
||||||
240 | Book of Amos Chpt 8 and 9 | Bible general Archive 2 | kalos | 119332 | ||
www.studylight.org 'You must check out this incredible online Bible resource site at http://www.studylight.org/ 'It is packed with the most Bibles and study resources found on the net, everything needed to help you in your study of God's Word. 'The best part is, IT'S ALL FREE!!!' **************************** http://bible.crosswalk.com/ 'Our aim is to offer the freshest and most compelling biblically-based content to Christians who take seriously their relationship with Christ. Crosswalk.com is built around four primary content areas – Faith, Family, Fun and Community. Each category is further subdivided into areas of significance to many Christians, including Bible Study, Devotionals, Marriage, Parenting, Music, etc.' Bible Study Tools - Online Study Bible - Bible In A Year - Interlinear Bible - Parallel Bible - Commentaries - Concordances - Dictionaries - Encyclopedias - Lexicons - History - Sermon Helps - Other Resources |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ] Next > Last [212] >> |