Results 221 - 240 of 277
|
||||||
Results from: Answers On or After: Thu 12/31/70 Author: charis Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
221 | Can a homosexual be an "Elect" | Matt 12:31 | charis | 1889 | ||
Dear TruthSeeker, As I am not in a position to say whether or not a person is of the elect (it is, after all, not a 'feeling'), it is difficult to answer. However, after reading the exhortations in Romans 1:18-27 (reagarding the unnatural lusts of people rebelling against common sense), I find it difficult to believe that God would call such a person without providing a way for them to be set free from that sin. I can well imagine God saving anyone, because He saved me, but He gave me victory over my many sins. As yet, I am not sinless, and I do not expect to become sinless in this life, but the direction of my life changed dramatically. I would say that homosexuality would come under the category of 'in need of drastic change of direction.' Without getting into an 'election' discussion, how might someone determine their 'elect' status without some profound evidence? To say, "My fundamental rebellion against the Word of God remains, but I am convinced I am of the 'elect,'" is a questionable statement of faith. I hope this answers the question. In Jesus' name. charis |
||||||
222 | In the NT who was Apollos? | NT general Archive 1 | charis | 1869 | ||
Dear JVH0212, It seems that the 10 scriptures that refer to Apollos are talking about the same person. (This is rare in the Bible) From the way that Paul respects him, and equates Apollos with himself or Cephas (Peter), I would think that he was an apostle. In any case he, was a respected (even too respected, close to idolized, much like Paul) for his ministry to the church. "I planted, Apollos watered, but God was causing the growth." 1 Corinthians 3:6 NASB. Some say that he had the ministry of shepherding, beacause 'planting' is a one-time thing, but 'watering' reqires multiple application and commitment. I do not completely agree with this, because many others could be 'watering' as well, but it is a good thought. Also, it seems that Apollos was at many churches, as was Paul. I like Apollos, and don't think he got a 'big head,' because he seemed leery to return to Corinth. "Jerome thinks that Apollos remained there until he heard that the divisions in the church at Corinth had been healed by Paul's letter and then returned and became bishop of that city. Other authorities make him bishop of Duras, of Colophon, of Iconium (in Phrygia), and of Caesarea." (New Ungers Bible Dictionary) Blessings in Christ Jesus. charis |
||||||
223 | This is why...? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1810 | ||
Dear SSprln, When you say that non-denominational churches have no standard theological teaching, it may or may not be true. They may have a very standard theology, but just prefer not to be bound by a denominational title. Or, they really might have a non-standard, sub-standard, or para-standard theology :-) But when you say they have no set theological teaching, this also may or may not be true. They might have a set theology, but not standard, or, they may have a truly un-set theology, that changes all the time. Is that clear? ;-) Seriously, my friend, non-denominational can mean many things. Sometimes 'independent' is used (or abused). I personally do not believe that Jesus wants denominations, and I am certain that He has no 'favorite.' My church is 'non-denominational' and-or 'independent.' We have no hierachal affiliation to another church, mother church, or denomination. Yet, we have a set (subject to 'adjustment' by the Holy Spirit) theological teaching, which is surprisingly standard. You could say we are a 'hybrid,' but I prefer the word 'distillation.' We want to please our Master, not His minions. Blessings in Christ Jesus. charis |
||||||
224 | To: charis, JVH0212 and HeirofGod | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1615 | ||
Thank YOU, EveryHome. We all look forward to your safe return. Godspeed to you, friend in Christ. | ||||||
225 | Where did Easter get its name? | NT general Archive 1 | charis | 1595 | ||
Yes, my friend,the origin is pagan. "The word (Easter) is of Saxon origin, Eastra, the goddess of spring, in whose honor sacrifices were offered about Passover time each year. By the eighth century Anglo-Saxons had adopted the name to designate the celebration of Christ's resurrection." (New Unger's Bible Dictionary) It is mentioned once in the Bibles I checked: "And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people." Acts 12:4 KJV. I posted this last night (Japan time) but it got lost. (Must be 'Mir' related :-) In Christ Jesus. |
||||||
226 | Please explain this verse? | Mark 15:34 | charis | 1561 | ||
Dear friend, you are right! It is a shame when our zeal to inform others of our thoughts turns us from the 'job at hand.' I will attempt to stay on track, and thank you for reminding me of focus and dignity. The words Jesus spoke are a quote from Psalm 22:1. Some say that He probably prayed the entire psalm, as a testimony that He Himself answered the prophecy of this psalm. (The Pulpit Commentary) "Posterity will serve Him; It will be told of the Lord to the coming generation.They will come and will declare His righteousness To a people who will be born, that He has performed it." Psalm 22:30,31 NASB I am of this camp, I find it unthinkable that the Lord was 'temporarily seperated' from the Trinity, or that He 'experienced' hell. I do believe that he experienced death and derision that the prophecies would be fulfilled, and that He would indeed be proven victorious over Satan. Only God's Anointed could do so. Though He was 'as a lamb led to slaughter,' from the moment after "It is finished," He was crowned in glory and resurrection power. For us, Amen! In Christ Jesus. |
||||||
227 | Personal Introduction Service? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1527 | ||
I might as well get this off the list. Thanks, StudyBibleForum for providing a means to have personal contact. In Christ Jesus, charis | ||||||
228 | Define "Pope." | 1 Pet 2:9 | charis | 1521 | ||
Dear friend, Instead I'll define Peter: A simple fisherman, probably wearing fairly simple clothes, surrounded by fairly simple people who had thrown away their 'tradition' to follow a simple Man. Peter was married. He was a servant first, and exhorted those around him (and us, too!) to be examples to the flock, never 'lording over' them. Peter never spoke a word concerning his righteousness, and never hinted that he was a priest between God and man. Please compare Peter with the definition provided by PNLamb. Blessings in Christ Jesus. |
||||||
229 | Is there an age of accountability? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1182 | ||
Dear Joseph, the answer is No. The question is, "Were you looking for a particular answer?" You got the answers you got because of your ambiguous question. If you want to discuss this with those of your own thinking, use personal email. We have been invited by our hosts to a Christian Bible Forum, for the edification of the saints, with views and commentary by ALL for ALL. I can imagine that some Christians new to their faith would be thrilled to see lively discussion, but disappointed to see petty bickering among mature men of the Word. The best way you can show forth your bent, is to use the Bible clearly, use common sense, and show a little honor and dignity. (and maybe a wee bit of humor :-) With love in Christ Jesus. | ||||||
230 | Blood sacrifices during the Millenium? | Heb 10:12 | charis | 1430 | ||
Dear Nrojac, Hebrews 10:12 states, " but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God," This is said in other ways throughout the New Testament. For anyone to negate this teaching, it would seem the burden of proof is upon the one proposing it. I can find no reference to reinstatement of blood sacrifices, and have no reason to believe God is going to send 'Christian offspring' to hell. In Jesus |
||||||
231 | May I Ask Again... Bible Software? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1389 | ||
Dear EveryHome, I have the NAS Electronic Bible Library and BibleMaster, both by Foundation. Both are very good. The price of the BibleMaster is hard to beat, and it loads into Japanese WinMe O.S. with no problems. I have a few others (sorry, forgot the names) but they were overly complicated, so they got 'put away,' maybe forever. (i.e. I forgot where they are) I use the computer for reference a lot, but still like the printed Bible to read. | ||||||
232 | Sin vs. sins vs. iniquity? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1326 | ||
I'll get this one off, too. | ||||||
233 | Sin vs. sins vs. iniquity? | Bible general Archive 1 | charis | 1325 | ||
Dear me, Apparently, no one could, would, or did answer this question. In case anyone was wondering (but I guess not) I was not talking about singular and plural sin. Sin seems to be in the being, in the heart of man. Sins are the many actions and inactions of man that are not pleasing to God, thus against Him. Iniquity seems to be a judgement of the person, not his actions. Thus, it seems to refer to in-born sin inherited from Adam. Dead works are those things that we do that are not in accord with God's will. Even though they may seem to have some benefit in the perpetrator's eyes, they are selfish in nature, thus sin. Jesus died for our sins and our sin. Though sin is dealt with immediately upon our confession of Christ as Savior, sins are still a part of man until final judgment. Sins will be brought before the Lord, and dealt with at the judgment seat of Christ. | ||||||
234 | Are Christians commanded to eat meat? | 1 Corinthians | charis | 1307 | ||
Dear shorty, No, we are not commanded to eat meat. No, you can choose either way, but meat is a healthy food, and helps balance your diet. No, I believe that the Lord Jesus was blameless before His countrymen. A comment: What is a humane way to kill an animal for food? This is truly in the realm of emotions. Or, perhaps there is a Bible reference to animal 'feelings' or animal 'rights?' These emotions are humanist in origin, and care must be given when assigning our hearts to a non-spiritual issue. Blessings in Christ Jesus. | ||||||
235 | Women speak in church? | 1 Cor 14:34 | charis | 1284 | ||
Friend, to answer your short question, YES!, they do. More seriously, I have been to churches where women are literally not allowed to say anything at all in the sanctuary. I thought this was unnnatural, and a bit legalistic. (As I recall, women made up for it elsewhere :-) I believe that Paul was addressing a specific situation in the Church at Corinth, not a general doctrine for every church for all time. I think you are asking whether or not women should be allowed to preach or teach or hold office. As for preaching and teaching, I think that all Christians are called to proclaim their faith and the Gospel of Jesus Christ. As to 'office' and the pulpit, I admit I am moderately chauvinistic. Moderate because my church has female deacons, and they (and the elder's wives) preach at times during our evening services, which are usually a bit more informal than Sunday morning worship. Chauvinistic (to some) because I generally believe that the pastor and elders should be men, ideally with (a) wife and family. I think this is the pattern we have been given, and that there is balance in it. However, this said, I would not say, "Never." I am open to other ideas from the Bible. In Christ Jesus. |
||||||
236 | Unmarried men pastors? | 1 Timothy | charis | 1283 | ||
Dear Dud M3, Welcome! I tend to agree with you that the Bible seems to be recommending ministers to be men with one (present?) wife. I am aware of other traditions and interpretations, but not only does this seem to be the Biblical pattern, but it makes a lot of common sense as well. One issue is the spiritual authority of a man in his own home. Another issue is that unmarried ministers, men or women have a serious, real handicap when dealing with the complications of shepherding the flock, the majority of whom will be married with children. Even married, if you are very young and without children, it makes it difficult to be taken seriously by those who are in need of counsel and spiritual help. A great deal of experience is gained by being responsible for a family of your own that will apply to your spiritual family. By saying these things, I am not trying to discount anyone from service to God, just simply stating a few practical realities. I have met Catholic priests, who last I heard, cannot be married, and though nice fellows and well-trained, I saw obvious gaps in their ability to serve God's people. (I am certain that they may have a different opinion) I have also met many women pastors and leaders, some married and some not. Overall, there seemed to be an unbalance. I don't think I could say anything further that would not be teribly misconstrued, so 'nuff said. (Again, I am certain that they might hold a different opinion!!) In my church, we have women deacons (deaconesses?), and there seems to be a real area of spiritual ministry available to them (not just menial). Again, without getting into trouble, I will just say, "It works." In my opinion, Bible teaching is the literal word, without being Pharisaical, plus a healthy dose of common sense. I am pretty certain that God is sensible. It seems that most departure from the 'married men' norm has been political, financial, and-or emotional; anything but Biblical and practical. Blessings in Jesus' name! | ||||||
237 | Unmarried men pastors? | 1 Timothy | charis | 1282 | ||
Dear Dud M3, Welcome! I tend to agree with you that the Bible seems to be recommending ministers to be men with one (present?) wife. I am aware of other traditions and interpretations, but not only does this seem to be the Biblical pattern, but it makes a lot of common sense as well. One issue is the spiritual authority of a man in his own home. Another issue is that unmarried ministers, men or women have a serious, real handicap when dealing with the complications of shepherding the flock, the majority of whom will be married with children. Even married, if you are very young and without children, it makes it difficult to be taken seriously by those who are in need of counsel and spiritual help. A great deal of experience is gained by being responsible for a family of your own that will apply to your spiritual family. By saying these things, I am not trying to discount anyone from service to God, just simply stating a few practical realities. I have met Catholic priests, who last I heard, cannot be married, and though nice fellows and well-trained, I saw obvious gaps in their ability to serve God's people. (I am certain that they may have a different opinion) I have also met many women pastors and leaders, some married and some not. Overall, there seemed to be an unbalance. I don't think I could say anything further that would not be teribly misconstrued, so 'nuff said. (Again, I am certain that they might hold a different opinion!!) In my church, we have women deacons (deaconesses?), and there seems to be a real area of spiritual ministry available to them (not just menial). Again, without getting into trouble, I will just say, "It works." In my opinion, Bible teaching is the literal word, without being Pharisaical, plus a healthy dose of common sense. I am pretty certain that God is sensible. It seems that most departure from the 'married men' norm has been political, financial, and-or emotional; anything but Biblical and practical. Blessings in Jesus' name! | ||||||
238 | The headship of Christ | Col 3:17 | charis | 1264 | ||
Dear Ray V.H., Why? For instance, the body of Christ, the name of the Lord. It would not denote a personal name, so no capital. Possibly, "My Head, my Savior?" In Jesus. | ||||||
239 | Pre Wrath Rapture? | 1 Thessalonians | charis | 1262 | ||
Dear EveryHome, Watch "Left Behind." I am not 'pre-tribulation' per se, but the concept was interesting. (Except the 'empty wombs' bit, implying that all babies are saved) Discuss! In Christ Jesus. | ||||||
240 | Enoch's prophesy in OT? | Jude 1:14 | charis | 1260 | ||
Dear bcbloyd, 'The Book of Enoch' is not included in "The New English Bible, with the Apocrypha" and though I do not own a "Catholic Bible, with Apocrypha" I do not think it is there, either. Look at Amazon.com, there were a few good reviews that might help you. One reviewer says that Jude is using a bit of sarcasm there. Blessings in Christ Jesus. | ||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ] Next > Last [14] >> |