Results 21 - 40 of 281
|
||||||
Results from: Notes Author: Parable Ordered by Date |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191963 | ||
"Do you bite your thumb at us, sir?" --Abraham to Sampson, Act 1, Scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet. Your point about the Reformation is not in dispute. However since then, there have sprung up new traditions, doctrines, denominations, etc. So, for this thread, and this thread alone, anything outside the body of work known as SCRIPTURE should be posted elsewhere. Providing the actual text is merely a courtesy for those who may wish to assimilate your post in one reading. As for citations, the system of chapter and verse were imposed upon scripture long after the canon was set. The original authors and original recipients of scripture would find our current system rather alien. Don't you wonder if compartmentalizing the Word in this way has changed how we perceive it, compared to how it was originally understood? As for the version I prefer, the NIV will suffice, thanks! |
||||||
22 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191946 | ||
now I'll show you how much you do know :) Worldliness is a concept from the biblical worldview. If you can cite scriptures that describe what it means to be worldly, that would be cool. Perhaps its a two part question.... |
||||||
23 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191943 | ||
Thanks, Doc Would you be so kind as to respond with the texts of those verses so we can more conveniently appreciate your response? I note that "Reformed thinking" is a tradition of the church, not scripture, so its not a topic for this thread. As for Watson's assertion, how about "Though he slay me, yet will I hope in him; I will surely defend my ways to his face." -- Job 13:15 Parable |
||||||
24 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191942 | ||
I agree that many questions relate to the meaning of a particular verse of scripture, or perhaps a biblical principle. Yet also, there are many who ask a question without any idea what verses may relate. In either case, this exercise is for those who are interested in attempting to rely entirely upon scripture either to answer a question or shed light upon itself. I'm not suggesting that this method be adopted universally, but rather be viewed merely as one option for those who wish to consider it as a hermenuetical discipline. Clearly, as has been so eloquently pointed out, we must be mindful of the limitations of such an approach. Yet, it is the purpose of this exercise to flesh out what those limitations might be, as well as possibly discover its legitimate utility. As for how Jesus responded, I note that with the devil in the desert, during his tempation, he did not engage in any dialogue other than to rebuke the devil with specific counters directly from scripture.....no expositions, commentaries or dictionaries are reported. You hit the nail on the head when you said "...or we can do our best to follow the lead of our King and attempt to open up the Scriptures..." It is the words "do our best" and "attempt" that inspire this exercise...which I offer as an attempt to do exactly that. I look forward to your next post. My next question is: What constitutes a biblical worldview, as compared and contrasted with worldliness? Please respond with the text of whatever scripture you feel is appropriate along with any necessary for proper context. |
||||||
25 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191936 | ||
As much as I respect and admire Tozer and Piper, both of whom I have read, their comments are not scripture. Can you instead idenfity the verses that may have inspired Tozer and Piper to say these things? That would be cool. |
||||||
26 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191935 | ||
I note that you have not provided scripture itself, but rather only citations that identify parts of scripture. Perhaps in the future, for the convenience of your readers, you might provide the actual texts. That scripture distinguishes the two words could have been easily demonstrated by providing the appropriate texts alone, such that your explanation would not be necessary. I look forward to your next post! |
||||||
27 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191934 | ||
Your point is well taken, context is important. Yet, I submit the context in which I cite Luke 24:45 and James 1:5 is appropriate, that context being this forum. You say that to quote scripture out of context is pretext, which means "something serving to conceal plans; a fictitious reason that is concocted in order to conceal the real reason". Given this, what is the problem with introducing this thread with the idea that Jesus opened the minds of his disciples so they may understand scripture and that God will provide wisdom to those who ask? I note that there are other instances in scripture in which the truth of God's word is revealed by Him, not our own understanding. Sincerely, Parable |
||||||
28 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191933 | ||
To clarify: The point of the exercise is to let scripture speak for itself. I regret using the phrase "you got game", for it has been miscontrued that I think this forum is a game. For that I apologize. As for the thesaurus and dictionary, I agree they are useful for distinguishing shades of meaning, but the point here is not to split hairs, heirs or hares. Rather, its to understand why the bible authors chose to use one word, e.g. preach, in one place, and another word, e.g. teach, in another. We are called to divide the word rightly, 2Tim2:14-15 "Keep reminding them of these things. Warn them before God against quarreling about words; it is of no value, and only ruins those who listen. Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a workman who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth." I hope you will reconsider, you are obviously sincere in your commitment to honoring God and who better to witness through the Word than those who love it. |
||||||
29 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191909 | ||
Tweet....traveling! A thesaurus and dictionary are not scripture. Does scripture distinguish teaching from preaching? If so, how are they different and/or the same? |
||||||
30 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191908 | ||
Hi John, The instructions were: 1) ask a question, or 2) post a response containing scripture and nothing but scripture. If you will note, in each of my posts, I have asked a question, not attempted to answer one. The contraint to keep one's response limited to scripture applies to answering, not asking. (of course, now that I am answering your question, I have failed to observe rule 2, perhaps questions of clarification on the exercise itself should be exceptions, no?) I'm glad you asked about this, because I expected there to be a learning curve and a need to adjust as we work through the bugs. Peace, Parable |
||||||
31 | Would his heart not be humbled? | Romans | Parable | 191904 | ||
a most excellent response! | ||||||
32 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191903 | ||
From these verses, it seems preaching is about the gospel, Jesus and the resuurrection, while teaching or exhorting is about other parts of scripture. How is preaching different from teaching? |
||||||
33 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191900 | ||
Excellent citation! What therefore does it mean, as instructed here, to PREACH THE WORD? |
||||||
34 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191896 | ||
I never said not to provide the scriptural context, indeed, it would be irresponsible not to. All I am proposing is this: Instead of superimposing interpretation or explanation onto scripture, simply provide the necessary verse you think answers the question and whatever other verses are necessary to provide the appropriate context, all without embellishments. Why not let God's Word speak for itself? |
||||||
35 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191887 | ||
Your concerns are noted. If context is relevant, then that context should be included in one's answer, in the form of the verses that comprise that context. | ||||||
36 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191886 | ||
Your concerns are noted. If context is relevant, then that context should be included in one's answer, in the form of the verses that comprise that context. | ||||||
37 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191885 | ||
Your concerns are noted. If context is relevant, then that context should be included in one's answer, in the form of the verses that comprise that context. | ||||||
38 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191884 | ||
Does scripture teach how scripture should be taught? | ||||||
39 | Scripture alone? | James 1:5 | Parable | 191881 | ||
Does scripture teach how scripture should be taught? | ||||||
40 | Stumpped by my son | Bible general Archive 3 | Parable | 191864 | ||
Hi BradK, My support for Boyd's work comes from the fact that in his book "Satan and the Problem of Evil", Boyd has resolved to my satisfaction the issues highlighted by the penetrating questions of an adolescent boy to his father who struggles to provide meaningful answers. The problem of evil has long been an intractable conundrum, yet I feel of all the treatments I have read, Boyd's is the most cogent, and he painstakingly builds his arguement from the sole authority of scripture. The bible teaches that we should test everything and keep what is good. If you read that book, I expect you might agree with me that it offers something of value to consider. I note that in rabban's thoughtful responses to the boy's questions, there are some sentiments that parallel what Boyd might say, yet no one objects to statements such as: "No one can change God's overall plan. It is arrogant to expect Him to do so. What they can do is seek adjustments within it." Adjustments? "No prayer can change God's divine plan. It can only cause changes within it." changes? I also note that many of the boy's questions remain conveniently ignored, except in the books I suggested. |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ] Next > Last [15] >> |