Results 21 - 24 of 24
|
||||||
Results from: Answered Bible Questions, Unanswered Bible Questions Author: kw5kw Ordered by Verse |
||||||
Results | Verse | Author | ID# | |||
21 | was the 'other' refering to Peter? | Gal 1:6 | kw5kw | 162836 | ||
Can anyone give me the background information behind Paul's writing of Galatians? The history, the situations, who was the preacher of the 'other gospel' etc. I have heard that this preacher was Peter, any comments on that? Yea or nay? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Russ |
||||||
22 | Do I have this right? | Heb 1:1 | kw5kw | 163519 | ||
1God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 2Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; 3Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high: 4Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they. Heb. 1:1 sundry: polumeros: at many times and many ways. divers: polutropos: in many manners; in many parts (polus: much; tropos: manner or way) Heb 1:2 universe (or world): aion: the aggregrate of things continued in time; an age; a period of time. Heb 1:3 upholding/sustaining: phero: the preserver of the universe; to burden; to carry. word: rhema: utterance, to take the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God; His omnipotent command. purged:poieo and katharismos: a clensing from the guilt of sins by the exiatory sacrifice of Christ resulting in a purifying in the moral sense from sins. After studying these verses, do not they just affirm the views about different ages, i.e. dispensationalism? |
||||||
23 | are we just too blind to see? | Heb 1:1 | kw5kw | 163572 | ||
Greetings Doc, Thanks for the reply. I'm struggling heavily with this issue, the more and more I read, the more I kinda understand that: (1) God treated Adam differently than anyone else ever. (2) God treated Noah thru Gideon differently by appearing directly to them. (3) After Samuel and to the cross He mainly talked through certain prophets and not directly to the leaders. (4) After the Jesus died on the cross, He considers us (the last 2000 years) a bit differently by saving us thru Grace. (5) After Jesus comes back, then there will be still another way in which we are treated in heaven when we have no sin (compared to this age). Covenant theory does indicate at least two dispensations anyway. My 'Jamieson, Fausset and Brown Commenaries' along with my 'Barnes Notes on the Bible' tend to lean towards (and use the word dispensations) in their commentaries. I know, I hear people say that it's a "new" teaching that only appeared on the scene in the 19th Century. But, how long did we go before Luther pinned his 95 on the door of the church? Some 1500(plus) years, right! Then Calvin was along, these reforms, aren't exactly old compared to the church. We're discovering something new about the way that God reveals his word that has been there all along, were we were just too blind to see? Russ |
||||||
24 | is the archangel bad? | Jude 1:9 | kw5kw | 140755 | ||
Am I mistaken in thinking the archangel is bad? In Jude 1:9 "But Michael the archangel, when he disputed with the devil and argued about the body of Moses, did not dare pronounce against him a railing judgment, but said, "The Lord rebuke you!"" I was always under the assumption that the archangel was like the devil. Please help me on this |
||||||
Result pages: << First < Prev [ 1 2 ] |